Recording of electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses after electrical stimulation with biphasic, triphasic and precision triphasic pulses

Hearing Research

Volumn 259, Issue 1-2, 2010, Pages 75-85

  Bahmer, Andreas ^a   Polak, Marek ^b   Baumann, Uwe ^a  

^a GOETHE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b MED EL GmbH   (Austria)

Author keywords

Artifact; Biphasic; Cochlear implant; E ABR; Precision triphasic; Stimulation protocol; Triphasic

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRIC CURRENT; ELECTROSTIMULATION; EVOKED BRAIN STEM AUDITORY RESPONSE; EVOKED RESPONSE AUDIOMETRY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECORDING; RESPONSE TIME;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; AGED; ARTIFACTS; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL PHENOMENA; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY, BRAIN STEM; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOACOUSTICS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 73449125424     PISSN: 03785955     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2009.10.003     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Alvarez I., Torre A., Sainz M., Roldan C., Schoesser H., and Spitzer P. Generalized alternating stimulation: a novel method to reduce stimulus artifact in electrically evoked compound action potentials. J. Neurosci. Meth. 165 (2007) 95-103
2. Bahmer A., Peter O., and Baumann U. Recording of electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses (E-ABR) with an integrated stimulus generator in Matlab. J. Neurosci. Meth. 173 (2008) 306-314
3. Bonnet R.M., Frijns J.H., Peeters S., and Briaire J.J. Speech recognition with a cochlear implant using triphasic charge-balanced pulses. Acta Otolaryngol. 124 (2004) 371-375
4. Brown C.J., Abbas P.J., Fryauf-Bertschy H., Kelsay D., Gantz J., and Bruce J. Intraoperative and postoperative electrically evoked auditory brain stem responses in nucleus cochlear implant users: implications for the fitting process. Ear Hear. 15 (1994) 168-176
5. Burkard R.F., and Secor C. Handbook of Clinical Audiology (1994), Lippincott Williams and Wilkins (Chapter: Overview of Auditory Evoked Potentials)
6. Carlyon R.P., van Wieringen A., Deeks J.M., Long C.J., Lyzenga J., and Wouters J. Effect of inter-phase gap on the sensitivity of cochlear implant users to electrical stimulation. Hear. Res. 205 (2005) 210-224
7. Coste R.L., and Pfingst B.E. Stimulus features affecting psychophysical detection thresholds for electrical stimulation of the cochlea. III. Pulse polarity. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 99 (1996) 3099-3108
8. Eddington, D.K., Tierney, J., Noel, V., Hermann, B., Whearty, M., Finley, C.C., 2004. Speech processors for auditory prostheses. In: Ninth Quarterly Progress Report. NIH Contract N01-DC-2-1001.
9. Guiraud J., Gallego S., Arnold L., Boyle P., Truy E., and Collet L. Effects of auditory pathway anatomy and deafness characteristics? (1): on electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses. Hear. Res. 223 (2007) 48-60
10. Hartmann R., Topp G., and Klinke R. Discharge patterns of cat primary auditory fibers with electrical stimulation of the cochlea. Hear. Res. 13 (1984) 47-62
11. Ilberg C., Kiefer J., Pfenningdorff J.T.T., Hartmann R., Stuerzebecher E., and Klinke R. Electric-acoustic stimulation of the auditory system - new technology for severe hearing loss. J. Oto Rhino Laryngol. 61 (1999) 334-340
12. Jewett D.L., and Williston J.S. Auditory-evoked far fields averaged from the scalp of humans. Brain 94 (1971) 681-696
13. Macherey O., Carlyon R.P., van Wieringen A., Deeks J.M., and Wouters J. Higher sensitivity of human auditory nerve fibers to positive electrical currents. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 9 (2008) 241-251
14. Miller A.C., Abbas P.J., Robinson B.K., Rubinstein J.T., and Matsuoka A.J. Electrically evoked single-fiber action potentials from cat: responses to monopolar, monophasic stimulation. Hear. Res. 130 (1999) 197-218
15. Miller C.A., Abbas P.J., Rubinstein J.T., Robinson B.K., Matsuoka A.J., and Woodworth G. Electrically evoked compound action potentials of guinea pig and cat: responses to monopolar, monophasic stimulation. Hear. Res. 119 (1998) 142-154
16. Møller A. Intraoperative Neurophysiologic Monitoring (2006), Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York
17. Polak M., Eshraghi A., Nehme O., Ahsan S., Guzman J., Delgado R., He J., Telischi F., Balkany T., and Water T.V.D. An efficient method for evaluating hearing and auditory nerve function by combining ABR, DPOAE and EABR tests into a single recording session. J. Neurosci. Met. 134 (2004) 141-149
18. Prado-Guitierrez P., Fewster L.M., Heasman J.M., McKay C.M., and Shepherd R.K. Effect of interphase gap and pulse duration on electrically evoked potentials is correlated with auditory nerve survival. J. Neurophysiol. 215 (2006) 47-55
19. Rubinstein J.T., Miller C.A., Mino H., and Abbas P.J. Analysis of monophasic and biphasic electrical stimulation of nerve. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 48 (2001) 1065-1070
20. Shepherd R.K., and Javel R.K. Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve. II. Effect of stimulus waveshape on single fibre response properties. Hear. Res. 130 (1999) 171-188
21. van den Honert C., and Stypulkowski P.H. Characterization of the electrically evoked auditory brainstem response (ABR) in cats and humans. Hear. Res. 21 (1986) 109-126
22. von Specht H. Progress in Computer-Assisted Function Analysis (1988), North Holland, Amsterdam (Chapter: Improvement of Averaging Method for Registration of Auditory Evoked Potential)
23. Wieringen A., Macherey O., Carlyon R.P., Deeks J.M., and Wouters J. Alternative pulse shapes in electrical hearing. Hear. Res. 242 (2008) 154-163