No effects of anodal transcranial direct stimulation on language abilities in early rehabilitation of post-stroke aphasic patients;Brak wpływu anodowej przezczaszkowej stymulacji pra{ogonek}dem stałym na funkcje je{ogonek}zykowe u chorych z afazja{ogonek} poudarowa{ogonek} be{ogonek}da{ogonek}cych we wczesnym okresie neurorehabilitacji

Neurologia i Neurochirurgia Polska

Volumn 47, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 414-422

  Ewa Polanowska, Katarzyna ^a   Leśniak, Marcin ^a   Barbara Seniów, Joanna ^a   Członkowska, Anna ^a  

^a II Klinika Neurologii   (Poland)

Author keywords

Aphasia; Stroke; Transcranial direct current stimulation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANOMIC APHASIA; APHASIA; ARTICLE; ATAXIC APHASIA; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGONAL BAND OF BROCA; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; ELECTRODE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PHYSIOTHERAPY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SCORING SYSTEM; SPEECH THERAPY; TRANSCRANIAL DIRECT CURRENT STIMULATION;

EID: 84886787262     PISSN: 00283843     EISSN: 18974260     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5114/ninp.2013.38221     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Nicholas M.L., Helm-Estabrooks N., Ward-Lonergan J, et al. Evolution of severe aphasia in the first two years post onset. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993; 74: 830-836.
2. Schlaug G., Marchina S., Norton A. Evidence for plasticity in white matter tracts of chronic aphasic patients undergoing intense intonation-based speech therapy. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2009; 1169: 385-394.
3. Pedersen P.M., Vinter K., Olsen T.S. Aphasia after stroke: type, severity and prognosis. The Copenhagen aphasia study. Cerebrovasc Dis 2004; 17: 35-43.
4. Fregni F., Pascual-Leone A. Technology insight: noninvasive brain stimulation in neurology - perspectives on the therapeutic potential of rTMS and tDCS. Nat Clin Pract Neurol 2007; 3: 383-393.
5. Hamilton R.H., Chrysikou E.G., Coslett B. Mechanisms of aphasia recovery after stroke and the role of noninvasive brain stimulation. Brain Lang 2011; 118: 40-50.
6. Schlaug G., Marchina S., Wan C.Y. The use of non-invasive brain stimulation techniques to facilitate recovery from poststroke aphasia. Neuropsychol Review 2011; 21: 288-301.
7. Bolognini N., Pascual-Leone A., Fregni F. Using non-invasive brain stimulation to augment motor training-induced plasticity. Neuroeng Rehabil 2009; 6: 1-13.
8. Harris-Love M.L., Cohen L.G. Noninvasive cortical stimulation in neurorehabilitation: a review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2006; 87: S84-S93.
9. Crinion J.T., Leff A.P. Recovery and treatment of aphasia after stroke: functional imaging studies. Curr Opin Neurol 2007; 20: 667-673.
10. Schlaug G., Renga V., Nair D. Transcranial direct current stimulation in stroke recovery. Arch Neurol 2008; 65: 1571-1576.
11. Nitsche M.A., Seeber A., Frommann K., et al. Modulating parameters of excitability during and after transcranial direct current stimulation of human motor cortex. J Physiol 2005; 568: 291-303.
12. Liebetanz D., Nitsche M.A., Tergau F., et al. Pharmacological approach to the mechanisms of transcranial DC-stimulationinduced aftereffects of human motor cortex excitability. Brain 2002; 125: 2238-2247.
13. Lang N., Siebner H.R., Ward N.S., et al. How does transcranial DC stimulation of the primary motor cortex alter regional neuronal activity in the human brain? Eur J Neurosci 2005; 22: 495-504.
14. Elsner B., Kugler J., Pohl M., et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for improving aphasia in patients after stroke. Cochrane Library 2012; DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009760.
15. Brunoni R.A., Nitsche M.A., Bolognini N., et al. Clinical re - search with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): challenges and future directions. Brain Stimul 2012; 5: 175-195.
16. Baker J.M., Rorden C., Fridriksson J. Using transcranial directcurrent stimulation to treat stroke patients with aphasia. Stroke 2010; 41: 1229-1236.
17. Fiori V., Coccia M., Marinelli C.V., et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation improves word retrieval in healthy and nonfluent aphasic subjects. J Cogn Neurosci 2011; 23: 2309-2323.
18. Flöel A., Meinzer M., Kirstein R., et al. Short-term anomia training and electrical brain stimulation. Stroke 2011; 42: 2065-2067.
19. Fridriksson J., Richardson J.D., Baker J.M., et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation improves naming reaction time in fluent aphasia: a double-blind, sham-controlled study. Stroke 2011; 42: 819-821.
20. Kang E.K., Kim Y.K., Sohn H.M., et al. Improved picture naming in aphasia patients treated with cathodal tDCS to inhibit the right Broca's homologue area. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2011; 29: 141-152.
21. Monti A., Cogiamanian F., Marceglia S., et al. Improved naming after transcranial direct current stimulation in aphasia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2008; 79: 451-453.
22. Vines B.W., Norton A.C., Schlaug G. Non-invasive brain stimulation enhances the effects of melodic intonation therapy. Front Psychol 2011; doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00230.
23. Saur D., Lange R., Baumgaertner A., et al. Dynamics of language reorganization after stroke. Brain 2006; 129: 1371-1384.
24. You D.S., Kim D.Y., Chun M.H., et al. Cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the right Wernicke's area improves comprehension in subacute stroke patients. Brain Lang 2011; 119: 1-5.
25. Winhuisen L., Thiel A., Schumacher B., et al. Role of the contralateral inferior frontal gyrus in recovery of language function in poststroke aphasia. A combined repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and positron emission tomography study. Stroke 2005; 36: 1759-1763.
26. Cattaneo Z., Pisoni A., Papagno C. Transcranial direct current stimulation over Broca's region improves phonemic and semantic fluency in healthy individuals. Neuroscience 2011; 183: 64-70.
27. Goodglass H., Kaplan E. The assessment of aphasia and related disorders. Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia 1972.
28. Kadzielawa D. Specyficzne problemy adaptacji testów klinicznych. Testy neuropsychologiczne. In: Ciechanowicz A. [red.]. Kulturowa adaptacja testów. Polskie Towarzystwo Psychologiczne, Wydział Psychologii Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego - Laboratorium Technik Diagnostycznych im. Bohdana Zawadzkiego, Warszawa 1990, pp. 161-173.
29. Gandiga P.C., Hummel F.C., Cohen L.G. Transcranial DC stimulation (tDCS): a tool for double-blind sham-controlled clinical studies in brain stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol 2006; 117: 845-850.
30. Nitsche M.A., Schauenburg A., Lang N., et al. Facilitation of implicit motor learning by weak transcranial direct current stimulation of the primary motor cortex in the human. J Cogn Neurosci 2003; 15: 619-626.
31. Nitsche M.A., Cohen L.G., Wassermann E.M., et al. Transcra - nial direct current stimulation: state of the art 2008. Brain Stimul 2008; 1: 206-223.
32. Polania R., Nitsche M.A., Paulus W. Modulating functional connectivity patterns and topological functional organization of the human brain with transcranial direct current stimulation. Hum Brain Mapp 2011; 32: 1236-1249.
33. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, Hillsdale 1988.
34. Cohen J. A power primer. Psychol Bull 1992; 112: 155-159.
35. Mahoney F.L., Barthel D.W. Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index. Md State Med J 1965; 14: 61-65.
36. Stagg C.J., Jayaram G., Pastor D., et al. Polarity and timingdependent effects of transcranial direct current stimulation in explicit motor learning. Neuropsychologia 2011; 49: 800-804.
37. Fregni F., Boggio P.S., Mansur C.G., et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation of the unaffected hemisphere in stroke pa - tients. Neuroreport 2005; 16: 1551-1555.
38. Malenka R.C., Bear M.F. LTP and LTD: an embarrassment of riches. Neuron 2004; 44: 5-21.
39. Johansson B.B. Brain plasticity and stroke rehabilitation: The Willis Lecture. Stroke 2000; 31: 223-230.
40. Hurtado O., Pradillo J.M., Alonso-Escolano D., et al. Neuro - repair versus neuroprotection in stroke. Cerebrovasc Dis 2006; 21: S54-S63.
41. Ferro J.M., Mariano G., Madureira S. Recovery from aphasia and neglect. Cerebrovasc Dis 1999; 9: S6-S22.