Knowledge representation and management enabling intelligent interoperability-principles and standards

Studies in Health Technology and Informatics

Volumn 186, Issue , 2013, Pages 3-21

  Blobel, Bernd ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF REGENSBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Architecture; Artificial intelligence; Decision support systems; Knowledge representation; Ontologies; Standards; System theory

Indexed keywords

ARCHITECTURE; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COMPUTER ARCHITECTURE; DECISION THEORY; INTEROPERABILITY; KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION; ONTOLOGY; STANDARDS; SYSTEM THEORY;

ARCHITECTURE-CENTRIC; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM (DSSS); HEALTH SERVICES; MANAGEMENT STANDARDS; MEDICAL DECISION SUPPORTS;

DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS;

ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; DATA BASE; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; GERMANY; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; MEDICAL RECORD; METHODOLOGY; STANDARD;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; DATABASE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, CLINICAL; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; FORMS AND RECORDS CONTROL; GERMANY; HEALTH RECORDS, PERSONAL; INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL; MEDICAL RECORD LINKAGE;

EID: 84886778327     PISSN: 09269630     EISSN: 18798365     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.3233/978-1-61499-240-0-3     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (83)

1. Blobel B. Architectural Approach to eHealth for Enabling Paradigm Changes in Health. Methods Inf Med 2010; 49(2): 123-134.
2. Object Management Group, The CORBA Security Specification. OMG Doc.No. 95-12-01. Inc.http://www.omg.org. Last access: December 1, 2009.
3. Kühn Pedersen M, and Holm Larsen M. Distributed knowledge management based on product state models-the case of decision support in health care administration. Decision Support Systems 2001; 31:139-158.
4. Kurtyka J. The Cognitive Dimension of Knowledge Management. EIMI Archives 2008; 1(11).
5. Berner ES, and La Lande TJ. Overview of Clinical Decision Support Systems. In: Berner ES (ed) Clinical Decision Support Systems-Theory and Practice. 2nd Edition. New York: Springer Science+Business Media; 2007.
6. Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, and Donaldson MS (eds) To Err Is Human-Building a Safer Health System. Institute of Medicine. Washington, D.C.: National Academic Press; 1999.
7. Szolovits P. Artificial Intelligence and Medicine. Chapter 1 in Szolovits, P. (Ed.) Artificial Intelligence in Medicine. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press; 1982.
8. Russell S, Norvig P. Artificial Intelligence-A Modern Approach. Boston; Pearson Education Inc.: 2010.
9. International Organization for Standardization. ISO 22600 Health informatics-Privilege management and access control. Geneva; 2006. www.iso.org (last accessed on 20 February 2013).
10. Völz H. Information. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag; 1982.
11. Blobel B. (2006) Concept Representation in Health Informatics for Enabling Intelligent Architectures. Stud Health Technol Inform 2006; 124:285-291.
12. Massoud TF, Hademenos GJ, Young WL, Gao E, Pile-Spellman J, and Vinuela F. Principles and philosophy of modeling in biomedical research. FASEB J 1998 Mar; 12(3):275-85.
13. Object Management Group, Inc. Unified Modeling Language (UML). www.omg.org/spec/UML/ (last accessed on 20 February 2013).
14. Collins Compact English Dictionary, New Editoin. Glasgow: Harper Collins Publishers; 1994.
15. Alter S. Information Systems-A Management Perspective. Reading: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company; 1992.
16. Pejman P. Methodic Applied Knowledge to Hyper Fictitious Intelligence, 2008 (MAKHFI.com). http://www.makhfi.com/ (last accessed on 20 February 2013).
17. van Bemmel JH, Musen MA (eds) Handbook of Medical Informatics. Heidelberg: Springer; 1997.
18. De la Cruz E, Lopez DM, Blobel B (2012) A Reference Architecture for Sharing Documents in Colombia. European Journal for Biomedical Informatics 8, 3; 2012: en11-en17.
19. Vida M, Stoicu-Tivadar L, Blobel B, Bernad E (2012) Modeling the Framework for Obstetrics-Gynecology Department Information System. European Journal for Biomedical Informatics 2012; 8(3):en57-en64.
20. Yildirim Yayilgan S, Blobel B, Petersen F, Hovstoł A, Pharow P, Waaler D, Hijazi Y (2012) An Architectural Approach to Building Ambient Intelligent Travel Companions. International Journal of E-Health and Medical Communications 2012; 3(3):86-95.
21. Ruotsalainen P, Blobel B, Seppälä A, Sorvari H, Nykänen P (2012) A Conceptual Framework and Principles for Trusted Pervasive Health. J Med Internet Res 2012; 14(2):e52. URL: http://www.jmir.org/2012/2/e52/ (last accessed on 20 February 2013).
22. Lopez DM, Blobel B (2009) A development framework for semantically interoperable health information systems. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2009; 78(2):83-103.
23. Bernal JG, Lopez DM and Blobel B (2012) Architectural Approach for Semantic EHR Systems Development Based on Detailed Clinical Models. Stud Health Technol Inform 2012; 177:164-169.
24. Bobrow DG, and Winograd T. An Overview of KRL, a Knowledge Representation Language. Technical Report AIM-293, Stanford Artificial Intelligence Lab., Stanford, Ca; 1976. ftp://reports.stanford.edu/pub/cstr/reports/cs/tr/76/581/CS- TR-76-581.pdf (last accessed on 20 February 2013).
25. Szolovits P, Hawkinson L, and Martin WA. An Overview of OWL, a Language for Knowledge Representation. In: Rahmstorf G, and Ferguson M (eds) Proceedings of the Workshop on Natural Language Interaction with Databases, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Schloss Laxenburg, Austria, 10 Jan 1977.
26. Guarino N. Formal ontology in information systems. In: Guarino N (ed) Formal Ontology in Information Systems, Proceedings of the 1st International Conference June 6-8, 1998, Trento, Italy, 3-15. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 1998.
27. Studer R, Benjamins R, and Fensel D. Knowledge engineering: Principles and methods. Data & Knowledge Engineering 1998; 25(1-2):161-198.
28. Freitas F, Schulz S, Moraes E: Survey of current terminologies and ontologies in biology and medicine. RECIIS-Electronic Journal in Communication, Information and Innovation in Health 2009; 3(1):7-18.
29. Noy NF, and McGuinness DL. Ontology Development 101: A Guide to Creating Your First Ontology. Stanford Knowledge Systems Laboratory Technical Report KSL-01-05 and Stanford Medical Informatics Technical Report SMI-2001-0880, March 2001.
30. IHTSDO: SNOMED CT®. http://www.ihtsdo.org/snomed-ct/ (last accessed on 20 February 2013).
31. Logical Observation Identifiers Names and Codes (LOINC®). loinc.org (last accessed on 20 February 2013).
32. Cycorp. OpenCyc. http://www.cyc.com/platform/opencyc (last accessed on 20 February 2013).
33. World Health Organization. International Classification of Diseases. www.who.int (last accessed on 20 February 2013).
34. U.S. National Library of Medicine. Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) http://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/(last accessed on 20 February 2013).
35. The Gene Ontology (GO) Consortium. The Gene Ontology. http://www.geneontology.org/ (last accessed on 20 February 2013).
36. openGALEN Foundation. The Generalized Architecture for Languages, Encyclopedias and Nomenclatures (openGALEN) www.opengalen.org/ (last accessed on 20 February 2013).
37. University of Washington, Structural Informatics Group. Foundational Model of Anatomy (FMA). fma.biostr.washington.edu/ (last accessed on 20 February 2013).
38. U.S. National Library of Medicine. Unified Medical Language System® (UMLS®). http://www.nlm.nih.gov/research/umls/ (last accessed on 20 February 2013).
39. The OBO Foundry. The Open Biological and Biomedical Ontologies. www.obofoundry.org/ (last accessed on 20 February 2013).
40. Smith B, Ashburner M, Rosse C, et al. The OBO Foundry: coordinated evolution of ontologies to support biomedical data integration. Nature Biotechnology 2007; 25(11): 1251-1255.
41. World Wide Web Consortium. Semantic Web. www.w3.org/standards/ semanticweb/ (last accessed on 20 February 2013).
42. World Wide Web Consortium. Resource Description Framework. www.w3.org/RDF/ (last accessed on 20 February 2013).
43. World Wide Web Consortium. RDF Schema. www.w3.org/TR/rdf-schema/ (last accessed on 20 February 2013).
44. TopicMaps.org Consortium. Topic Maps. www.topicmaps.org/ (last accessed on 20 February 2013).
45. The DARPA Agent Markup Language (DAML) Program. DARPA Agent Markup Language (DAML). www.daml.org/ (last accessed on 20 February 2013).
46. The DARPA Agent Markup Language (DAML) Program. Ontology Inference Layer (OIL). http://www.daml.org/language/
47. World Wide Web Consortium. Web Ontology Language (OWL). www.w3.org/standards/techs/owl (last accessed on 20 February 2013).
48. Davis R, Shrobe H, and Szolovits P. What is a Knowledge Representation? AI Magazine 1993; 14(1):17-33.
49. Spooner SA. Mathematical Foundations of Decision Support Systems. In: In: Berner ES (ed) Clinical Decision Support Systems-Theory and Practice. 2nd Edition. New York: Springer Science+Business Media; 2007.
50. IFOMIS. Basic Formal Ontology (BFO). www.ifomis.org/bfo (last accessed on 20 February 2013).
51. EU Project WonderWeb: Ontology Infrastructure for the Semantic Web. A Descriptive Ontology for Linguistic and Cognitive Engineering (DOLCE). http://wonderweb.man.ac.uk/ (last accessed on 20 February 2013).
52. Onto-Med. General Formal Ontology (GFO). www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo/
53. EU Project Semantically-Enabled Knowledge Technology (SEKT). PROTo ONtology (PROTON). proton.semanticweb.org/ (last accessed on 20 February 2013).
54. IEEE. The Suggested Upper Merged Ontology (SUMO). http://www. ontologyportal.org/ (last accessed on 20 February 2013).
55. COSMO Foundation. The Common Semantic Model (COSMO).
56. IEEE. The Multi-Source Ontology (MSO). http://suo.ieee.org/ (last accessed on 20 February 2013).
57. Uribe GA, Lopez DM and Blobel B. Architectural Analysis of Clinical Ontologies for pHealth Interoperability. Stud Health Technol Inform 2012; 177:176-182.
58. BFO2: http://code.google.com/p/bfo/ (last accessed on 20 February 2013).
59. International Organization for Standardization. ISO/IEC 10764 Reference Model Open Distributed Processing. Geneva; 1996 www.iso.org (last accessed on 20 February 2013).
60. Health Level 7 International, Inc. www.hl7.org
61. Fox J, Rahmanzadeh A. Disseminating medical knowledge: the PROforma approach. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 1998; 14:157-181.
62. PROforma. www.openclinical.org/gmm-proforma.html (last accessed on 20 February 2013).
63. Shahar Y, Miksch S, Johnson P. The Asgaard Project: A Task-Specific Framework for the Application and Critiquing of Time-Oriented Clinical Guidelines. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 1998; 14:29-51.
64. Asbru. www.openclinical.org/gmm-asbru.html (last accessed on 20 February 2013).
65. Tu SW, Musen MA. A Flexible Approach to Guideline Modeling. Proc AMIA Symp 1999:420-424.
66. EON. www.openclinical.org/gmm-eon.html (last accessed on 20 February 2013).
67. American Standards for Testing and Materials (ASTM). www.astm.org (last accessed on 20 February 2013).
68. Sordo M, Boxwala AA, Ogunyemi O, Greenes RA. Description and status update on GELLO: a proposed standardized object-oriented expression language for clinical decision support. Stud Health Technol Inform 2004; 107(Pt 1):164-168.
69. Medical-Objects. GELLO.org. www.gello.org (last accessed on 20 February 2013).
70. Boxwala AA, Peleg M, Tu S, Ogunyemi O, Zeng QT, Wang D, Patel VL, Greenes RA, Shortliffe EH. GLIF3: A Representation Format for Sharable Computer-Interpretable Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Biomed Inform 2004 Jun; 37(3):147-61.
71. The InterMed Collaboratory. http://mis.hevra.haifa.ac.il/~morpeleg/ Intermed (last accessed on 20 February 2013).
72. openEHR Foundation. www.openehr.org (last accessed on 20 February 2013).
73. Beale T, Heard S. Archetype Definition Language ADL 1.5. openEHR Foundation, January 2012, www.openehr.org (last accessed on 20 February 2013).
74. Blobel B, Goossen W, Brochhausen M. Clinical Modeling-a Critical Analysis. (submitted to International Journal of Medical Informatics)
75. Beale T. openEHR Archetype Query Language Description. http://www.openehr.org/wiki/display/spec/Archetype+Query+Language+Description (last accessed on 20 February 2013).
76. Beale T. Archetype Object Model AOM 2.1. openEHR Foundation, January 2012, www.openehr.org (last accessed on 20 February 2013).
77. CIMI Reference Model Report, Draft V 0.3, May 2012
78. Blobel B. Ontology driven health information systems architectures enable pHealth for empowered patients. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2011; 80:e17-e25.
79. Blobel B, Nordberg R, Davis JM, Pharow P. Modelling privilege management and access control. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2006; 75(8):597-623.
80. Damianou N, Dulay N, Lupu E, Sloman M. Ponder: a language for specifying security and management policies for distributed systems: the language specification, version 2.3. Imperial College Research Report DoC 2000-2001, 20 October 2000.
81. Organization for the Advancement of Structured Information Standards (OASIS), XACML 2.0. http://www.oasis-open.org/specs/index.php#xacml (last accessed on 20 February 2013).
82. Organization for the Advancement of Structured Information Standards (OASIS), SAML. https://www.oasis-open.org/standards#samlv2.0 (last accessed on 20 February 2013).
83. van Harmelen F, Lifschitz V, Porter B (eds) Handbook of Knowledge Representation. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2008