HCS-Neurons: Identifying phenotypic changes in multi-neuron images upon drug treatments of high-content screening

BMC Bioinformatics

Volumn 14, Issue SUPPL16, 2013, Pages

  Charoenkwan, Phasit ^a   Hwang, Eric ^a   Cutler, Robert W ^b   Lee, Hua Chin ^a   Ko, Li Wei ^a   Huang, Hui Ling ^a   Ho, Shinn Ying ^a  

^a NATIONAL CHIAO TUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b Edison State College   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATED IMAGE ANALYSIS; BIOLOGICAL MOLECULE; DRUG CONCENTRATION; FEATURE DESCRIPTORS; FEATURE SELECTION METHODS; HIGH-CONTENT SCREENING; PHENOTYPIC CHANGES; STATISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE;

REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

NEURONS;

NOCODAZOLE;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CELL LINE; CYTOLOGY; DRUG EFFECT; HIGH THROUGHPUT SCREENING; IMAGE PROCESSING; INFORMATION PROCESSING; METHODOLOGY; MOUSE; NERVE CELL; NEURITE; PHENOTYPE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE;

ANIMALS; AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING; CELL LINE; HIGH-THROUGHPUT SCREENING ASSAYS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MICE; NEURITES; NEURONS; NOCODAZOLE; PHENOTYPE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES;

EID: 84886769795     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712105     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-14-S16-S12     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Parekh R, Ascoli GA. Neuronal morphology goes digital: a research hub for cellular and system neuroscience. Neuron 2013, 77(6):1017-1038. 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.03.008, 23522039.
2. Bray MA, Carpenter A. Advanced Assay Development Guidelines for Image-Based High Content Screening and Analysis. Assay Guidance Manual 2004, Bethesda (MD), Sittampalam GS, Gal-Edd N, Arkin M, Auld D, Austin C, Bejcek B, Glicksman M, Inglese J, Lemmon V, Li Z et al.
3. Ho SY, Chao CY, Huang HL, Chiu TW, Charoenkwan P, Hwang E. NeurphologyJ: An automatic neuronal morphology quantification method and its application in pharmacological discovery. Bmc Bioinformatics 2011, 12.
4. Wang DD, Lagerstrom R, Sun CM, Bishof L, Valotton P, Gotte M. HCA-Vision: Automated Neurite Outgrowth Analysis. J Biomol Screen 2010, 15(9):1165-1170. 10.1177/1087057110382894, 20855562.
5. Wu CH, Schulte J, Sepp KJ, Littleton JT, Hong PY. Automatic Robust Neurite Detection and Morphological Analysis of Neuronal Cell Cultures in High-content Screening. Neuroinformatics 2010, 8(2):83-100. 10.1007/s12021-010-9067-9, 3022421, 20405243.
6. Schmitz SK, Hjorth JJJ, Joemai RMS, Wijntjes R, Eijgenraam S, de Bruijn P, Georgiou C, de Jong APH, van Ooyen A, Verhage M, et al. Automated analysis of neuronal morphology, synapse number and synaptic recruitment. J Neurosci Meth 2011, 195(2):185-193.
7. Dehmelt L, Poplawski G, Hwang E, Halpain S. NeuriteQuant: An open source toolkit for high content screens of neuronal Morphogenesis. Bmc Neurosci 2011, 12.
8. Schulte J, Sepp KJ, Wu C, Hong P, Littleton JT. High-content chemical and RNAi screens for suppressors of neurotoxicity in a Huntington's disease model. Plos One 2011, 6(8):e23841. 10.1371/journal.pone.0023841, 3166080, 21909362.
9. Belisle JM, Levin LA, Costantino S. High-Content Neurite Development Study Using Optically Patterned Substrates. Plos One 2012, 7(4).
10. Weber S, Fernandez-Cachon ML, Nascimento JM, Knauer S, Offermann B, Murphy RF, Boerries M, Busch H. Label-free detection of neuronal differentiation in cell populations using high-throughput live-cell imaging of PC12 cells. Plos One 2013, 8(2):e56690. 10.1371/journal.pone.0056690, 3579923, 23451069.
11. Gensel JC, Schonberg DL, Alexander JK, McTigue DM, Popovich PG. Semi-automated Sholl analysis for quantifying changes in growth and differentiation of neurons and glia. J Neurosci Meth 2010, 190(1):71-79.
12. Fanti Z, Martinez-Perez ME, De-Miguel FF. NeuronGrowth, a Software for Automatic Quantification of Neurite and Filopodial Dynamics from Time-Lapse Sequences of Digital Images. Dev Neurobiol 2011, 71(10):870-881. 10.1002/dneu.20866, 21913334.
13. Langhammer CG, Previtera ML, Sweet ES, Sran SS, Chen M, Firestein BL. Automated Sholl Analysis of Digitized Neuronal Morphology at Multiple Scales: Whole Cell Sholl Analysis Versus Sholl Analysis of Arbor Subregions. Cytom Part A 2010, 77A(12):1160-1168.
14. Leung CKS, Weinreb RN, Li ZW, Liu S, Lindsey JD, Choi N, Liu L, Cheung CYL, Ye C, Qiu KL, et al. Long-Term In Vivo Imaging and Measurement of Dendritic Shrinkage of Retinal Ganglion Cells. Invest Ophth Vis Sci 2011, 52(3):1539-1547.
15. Gaublomme D, Buyens T, Moons L. Automated Analysis of Neurite Outgrowth in Mouse Retinal Explants. J Biomol Screen 2012
16. Oglesby E, Quigley HA, Zack DJ, Cone FE, Steinhart MR, Tian J, Pease ME, Kalesnykas G. Semi-automated, quantitative analysis of retinal ganglion cell morphology in mice selectively expressing yellow fluorescent protein. Exp Eye Res 2012, 96(1):107-115. 10.1016/j.exer.2011.12.013, 3419383, 22210127.
17. Billeci L, Magliaro C, Pioggia G, Ahluwalia A. NEuronMOrphological analysis tool: open-source software for quantitative morphometrics. Frontiers in neuroinformatics 2013, 7:2. 3572679, 23420185.
18. Ho SY, Chen JH, Huang MH. Inheritable genetic algorithm for biobjective 0/1 combinatorial optimization problems and its applications. Ieee T Syst Man Cy B 2004, 34(1):609-620.
19. Chang CC, Lin CJ. LIBSVM: A Library for Support Vector Machines. Acm T Intel Syst Tec 2011, 2(3).
20. Chuckowree JA, Vickers JC. Cytoskeletal and morphological alterations underlying axonal sprouting after localized transection of cortical neuron Axons in vitro. J Neurosci 2003, 23(9):3715-3725.
21. Smith CL. The Initiation of Neurite Outgrowth by Sympathetic Neurons Grown in-Vitro Does Not Depend on Assembly of Microtubules (Vol 127, Pg 1407, 1994). J Cell Biol 1995, 128(3):443-443.
22. Lamoureux P, Steel VL, Regal C, Adgate L, Buxbaum RE, Heidemann SR. Extracellular-Matrix Allows Pc12 Neurite Elongation in the Absence of Microtubules. J Cell Biol 1990, 110(1):71-79. 10.1083/jcb.110.1.71, 2115996, 2153148.
23. Jacobs JR, Stevens JK. Experimental Modification of Pc12 Neurite Shape with the Microtubule-Depolymerizing Drug Nocodazole - a Serial Electron-Microscopic Study of Neurite Shape Control. J Cell Biol 1986, 103(3):907-915. 10.1083/jcb.103.3.907, 2114310, 3745274.
24. Kamentsky L, Jones TR, Fraser A, Bray MA, Logan DJ, Madden KL, Ljosa V, Rueden C, Eliceiri KW, Carpenter AE. Improved structure, function and compatibility for CellProfiler: modular high-throughput image analysis software. Bioinformatics 2011, 27(8):1179-1180. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr095, 3072555, 21349861.
25. Carpenter AE, Jones TR, Lamprecht MR, Clarke C, Kang IH, Friman O, Guertin DA, Chang JH, Lindquist RA, Moffat J, et al. CellProfiler: image analysis software for identifying and quantifying cell phenotypes. Genome Biol 2006, 7(10).
26. Misselwitz B, Strittmatter G, Periaswamy B, Schlumberger MC, Rout S, Horvath P, Kozak K, Hardt WD. Enhanced CellClassifier: a multi-class classification tool for microscopy images. Bmc Bioinformatics 2010, 11.
27. Ramo P, Sacher R, Snijder B, Begemann B, Pelkmans L. CellClassifier: supervised learning of cellular phenotypes. Bioinformatics 2009, 25(22):3028-3030. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp524, 19729371.
28. Cesar RM, Costa LD. Neural cell classification by wavelets and multiscale curvature. Biol Cybern 1998, 79(4):347-360. 10.1007/s004220050484, 9830709.
29. Teague MR. Image-Analysis Via the General-Theory of Moments. J Opt Soc Am 1980, 70(8):920-930.
30. Teh CH, Chin RT. On Digital Approximation of Moment Invariants. Comput Vision Graph 1986, 33(3):318-326.
31. Mukundan R, Ong SH, Lee PA. Image analysis by Tchebichef moments. Ieee T Image Process 2001, 10(9):1357-1364.
32. Zhang DS, Lu GJ. Shape-based image retrieval using generic Fourier descriptor. Signal Process-Image 2002, 17(10):825-848.
33. Haralick RM. Statistical and Structural Approaches to Texture. P Ieee 1979, 67(5):786-804.
34. Huang K, Murphy RF. Boosting accuracy of automated classification of fluorescence microscope images for location proteomics. Bmc Bioinformatics 2004, 5.
35. Bring J. How to Standardize Regression-Coefficients. Am Stat 1994, 48(3):209-213.
36. Ho SY, Shu LS, Chen JH. Intelligent evolutionary algorithms for large parameter optimization problems. Ieee T Evolut Comput 2004, 8(6):522-541.
37. Cuntz H, Forstner F, Haag J, Borst A. The Morphological Identity of Insect Dendrites. Plos Comput Biol 2008, 4(12).
38. McGarry LM, Packer AM, Fino E, Nikolenko V, Sippy T, Yuste R. Quantitative classification of somatostatin-positive neocortical interneurons identifies three interneuron subtypes. Front Neural Circuits 2010, 4:12. 2896209, 20617186.
39. Guerra L, McGarry LM, Robles V, Bielza C, Larranaga P, Yuste R. Comparison Between Supervised and Unsupervised Classifications of Neuronal Cell Types: A Case Study. Dev Neurobiol 2011, 71(1):71-82. 10.1002/dneu.20809, 3058840,3058840, 21154911.
40. Hwang JT, Chiang HC. The Study of High Resolution Satellite Image Classification based on Support Vector Machine. 2010 18th International Conference on Geoinformatics 2010
41. Kuo YL, Ko CC, Lin YM, Chen YM. Automated Classification of Breast Carcinoma Cell Based on Image Processing and Support Vector Machine. Biomed Eng-App Bas C 2010, 22(2):127-135.
42. Chen WS, Liu TJ, Wang BF. Ultrasonic image classification based on support vector machine with two independent component features. Comput Math Appl 2011, 62(7):2696-2703.
43. Qi YJ, Ou ZW, Zhang B, Liu TZ, Li Y. Natural Image Classification Based on Improved Support Vector Machine. Appl Mech Mater 2011, 58-60:2387-2391.
44. Lo CS, Wang CM. Support vector machine for breast MR image classification. Comput Math Appl 2012, 64(5):1153-1162.
45. Clausi DA. An analysis of co-occurrence texture statistics as a function of grey level quantization. Can J Remote Sens 2002, 28(1):45-62.