Collaborative schema matching reconciliation

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 8185 LNCS, Issue , 2013, Pages 222-240

  Quoc Viet Nguyen, Hung ^a   Luong, Xuan Hoai ^a   Miklós, Zoltán ^b   Quan, Tho Thanh ^c   Aberer, Karl ^a  

^a EPFL   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE RENNES 1   (France)

^c Vietnam National University Ho Chi Minh   (Viet Nam)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONFLICT RESOLUTION; DATABASE SCHEMAS; FORMAL REASONING; GLOBAL CONSISTENCY; HUMAN EXPERT; MAPPING PROBLEM; SCHEMA MATCHING;

DATA INTEGRATION; INTERNET; TOOLS;

COMPLEX NETWORKS;

EID: 84886741560     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-41030-7_14     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (47)

1. Aumueller, D., et al.: Schema and ontology matching with COMA++. In: SIGMOD, pp. 906-908 (2005)
2. Belhajjame, K.: User feedback as a first class citizen in information integration systems. In: CIDR, pp. 175-183 (2011)
3. Bentahar, J., et al.: Using argumentation to model and deploy agent-based B2B applications. In: KBS, pp. 677-692 (2010)
4. Bernstein, P.A., Madhavan, J., Rahm, E.: Generic Schema Matching, Ten Years Later. PVLDB 4(11), 695-701 (2011)
5. Besnard, P., Hunter, A.: Elements of Argumentation. The MIT Press (2008)
6. Blakeley, J.A., Larson, P.-A., Tompa, F.W.: Efficiently updating materialized views. SIGMOD Rec., 61-71 (1986)
7. Brewka, G., Eiter, T., Truszczyński, M.: Answer set programming at a glance. Commun. ACM, 92-103 (2011)
8. Calimeri, F., Cozza, S., Ianni, G., Leone, N.: Computable Functions in ASP: Theory and Implementation. In: Garcia de la Banda,M., Pontelli, E. (eds.) ICLP 2008. LNCS, vol. 5366, pp. 407-424. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
9. Caminada, M.: Semi-Stable Semantics. In: COMMA, pp. 121-130 (2006)
10. Charalabidis, Y., Gonalves, R.J., Popplewell, K.: Developing a Science Base for Enterprise Interoperability. In: Enterprise Interoperability IV, pp. 245-254 (2010)
11. Charwat, G., Wallner, J.P., Woltran, S.: Utilizing ASP for Generating and Visualizing Argumentation Frameworks. In: ASPOCP, pp. 51-65 (2012)
12. Doutre, S., Mengin, J.: On Sceptical Versus Credulous Acceptance for Abstract Argument Systems. In: Alferes, J.J., Leite, J. (eds.) JELIA 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3229, pp. 462-473. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
13. Duchateau, F., Bellahsene, Z., Coletta, R.: Matching and Alignment: What Is the Cost of User Post-Match Effort? In:Meersman, R., et al. (eds.) OTM2011, Part I. LNCS, vol. 7044, pp. 421-428. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)
14. Duchateau, F., et al.: (Not) yet another matcher. In: CIKM, pp. 1537-1540 (2009)
15. Dung, P.M.,Mancarella, P., Toni, F.: Computing ideal sceptical argumentation. Artif. Intell., 642-674 (2007)
16. Dung, P.M.: On the Acceptability of Arguments and its Fundamental Role in Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Logic Programming and n-Person Games. Artif. Intell. 77(2), 321-358 (1995)
17. Elvesaeter, B., et al.: Towards enterprise interoperability service utilities. In: ECOCW, pp. 224-229 (2008)
18. Emele, C.D., Norman, T.J., Parsons, S.: Argumentation strategies for plan resourcing. In: AAMAS, pp. 913-920 (2011)
19. Faratin, P., Sierra, C., Jennings, N.R.: Negotiation decision functions for autonomous agents. In: RAS, pp. 159-182 (1998)
20. Gal, A.: Uncertain Schema Matching. Morgan & Claypool Publishers (2011)
21. Gal, A., Sagi, T.: Tuning the ensemble selection process of schema matchers. In: JIS, pp. 845-859 (2010)
22. Gal, A., et al.: Completeness and ambiguity of schema cover. In:Meersman, R., Panetto, H., Dillon, T., Eder, J., Bellahsene, Z., Ritter, N., De Leenheer, P., Dou, D. (eds.) OTM 2013. LNCS, vol. 8185, pp. 241-258. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)
23. Gal, A., et al.: Making sense of top-k matchings: a unified match graph for schema matching. In: IIWeb, pp. 6:1-6:6 (2012)
24. Grosse, K., Chesevar, C.I., Maguitman, A.G.: An Argument-based Approach to Mining Opinions from Twitter. In: AT, pp. 408-422 (2012)
25. Haas, P., et al.: Data is Dead Without What-If Models. In: PVLDB, pp. 11-14 (2011)
26. Heras, S., et al.: The Role of Argumentation on the Future Internet: Reaching agreements on Clouds. In: AT, pp. 393-407 (2012)
27. Jeffery, S.R., Franklin, M.J., Halevy, A.Y.: Pay-as-you-go user feedback for dataspace systems. In: SIGMOD, pp. 847-860 (2008)
28. Kowalczyk, R., Bui, V.: On Constraint-Based Reasoning in e-Negotiation Agents. In: Dignum, F.P.M., Cortés, U. (eds.) AMEC 2000. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2003, pp. 31-46. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)
29. Kraus, S., Sycara, K., Evenchik, A.: Reaching agreements through argumentation: a logical model and implementation. In: AI, pp. 1-69 (1998)
30. Lee, Y., et al.: eTuner: tuning schema matching software using synthetic scenarios. JVLDB, 97-122 (2007)
31. Nagarajan,M., et al.: Semantic interoperability of web services-challenges and experiences. In: ICWS, pp. 373-382 (2006)
32. Nguyen, Q.V.H., et al.: An MAS Negotiation Support Tool for Schema Matching ( Demonstration). In: AAMAS, pp. 1391-1392 (2013)
33. Nguyen, Q.V.H., et al.: Minimizing Human Effort in Reconciling Match Networks. In: ER (2013)
34. Nguyen, Q.V.H., et al.: On Leveraging Crowdsourcing Techniques for Schema Matching Networks. In: DASFAA, pp. 139-154 (2013)
35. Ouksel, A.M., Sheth, A.: Semantic interoperability in global information systems. In: SIGMOD, pp. 5-12 (1999)
36. Parsons, S., Sierra, C., Jennings, N.: Agents that Reason and Negotiate by Arguing. JLC, 261-292 (1998)
37. Peukert, E., Eberius, J., Rahm, E.: AMC - A framework for modelling and comparing matching systems as matching processes. In: ICDE, pp. 1304-1307 (2011)
38. Prakken, H.: Some Reflections on Two Current Trends in Formal Argumentation. In: Artikis, A., Craven, R., Kesim Çiçekli, N., Sadighi, B., Stathis, K. (eds.) Sergot Festschrift 2012. LNCS, vol. 7360, pp. 249-272. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)
39. Qi, Y., Candan, K.S., Sapino, M.L.: FICSR: feedback-based inconsistency resolution and query processing on misaligned data sources. In: SIGMOD, pp. 151-162 (2007)
40. Rahm, E., Bernstein, P.A.: A Survey of Approaches to Automatic Schema Matching. JVLDB, 334-350 (2001)
41. Rahwan, I., Zablith, F., Reed, C.: Towards large scale argumentation support on the semantic web. In: AAAI, pp. 1446-1451 (2007)
42. Rahwan, I., et al.: Argumentation-based negotiation. In: KER, pp. 343-375 (2003)
43. Sá, S., Alcântara, J.: Cooperative dialogues with conditional arguments. In: AAMAS, pp. 501-508 (2012)
44. Saleem, K., Bellahsene, Z.: Complex Schema Match Discovery and Validation through Collaboration. In: Meersman, R., Dillon, T., Herrero, P. (eds.) OTM 2009, Part I. LNCS, vol. 5870, pp. 406-413. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
45. Sandholm, T.: Algorithm for optimal winner determination in combinatorial auctions. In: AI, pp. 1-54 (2002)
46. Sierra, C., Jennings, N.R., Noriega, P., Parsons, S.: A Framework for Argumentation-Based Negotiation. In: Singh, M.P., Rao, A., Wooldridge, M.J. (eds.) ATAL 1997. LNCS, vol. 1365, pp. 177-192. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)
47. Smith, K.P., et al.: The Role of Schema Matching in Large Enterprises. In: CIDR (2009)