An argument-based approach to mining opinions from twitter

CEUR Workshop Proceedings

Volumn 918, Issue , 2012, Pages 408-422

  Grosse, Kathrin ^a   Chesñevar, Carlos I ^b,c   Maguitman, Ana G ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OSNABRÜCK   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DEL SUR   (Argentina)

^c Facultad de Ciencias Naturales e Instituto M Lillo   (Argentina)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DEFEASIBLE ARGUMENTATION; HASHTAGS; INCONSISTENT INFORMATION; MICRO-BLOGGING PLATFORMS; PUBLIC OPINIONS; SOCIAL INTERACTIONS;

FORESTRY; SOCIAL ASPECTS;

SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE);

DATA PROCESSING; FORESTRY; SOCIOLOGY;

EID: 84886744159     PISSN: 16130073     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Martineau, J.: Identifying and Isolating Text Classification Signals from Domain and Genre Noise for Sentiment Analysis. PhD thesis, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, USA (2011).
2. Pak, A., Paroubek, P.: Twitter as a corpus for sentiment analysis and opinion mining. In Calzolari, N., Choukri, K., Maegaard, B., Mariani, J., Odijk, J., Piperidis, S., Rosner, M., Tapias, D., eds.: LREC, European Language Resources Association (2010).
3. Prakken, H., Reed, C., Walton, D.: Argumentation schemes and generalizations in reasoning about evidence. In: ICAIL. (2003) 32{41.
4. Besnard, P., Hunter, A.: The Elements of Argumentation. The MIT Press. London, UK (2008).
5. Rahwan, I., Simari, G. In: Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence. Springer Verlag (2009).
6. Garca, A.J., Simari, G.R.: Defeasible logic programming: An argumentative approach. TPLP 4(1-2) (2004) 95{138.
7. Torroni, P., Toni, F.: Bottom up argumentation. In: Prof. of First Intl. Workshop on Theoretical and Formal Argumentation (TAFA). IJCAI 2011, Barcelona, Spain. (2011).
8. Abbas, S., Sawamura, H.: Argument mining based on a structured database and its usage in an intelligent tutoring environment. Knowl. Inf. Syst. 30(1) (2012) 213{246.
9. Leite, J., Martins, J.: Social abstract argumentation. In Walsh, T., ed.: IJCAI, IJCAI/AAAI (2011) 2287{2292.
10. Amgoud, L., Serrurier, M.: Agents that argue and explain classifications. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 16(2) (2008) 187{209.
11. Mitchell, T.M.: Generalization as search. Artif. Intell. 18(2) (1982) 203{226.
12. Ganter, B., Wille, R.: Formal concept analysis - mathematical foundations. Springer (1999).
13. Thelwall, M., Buckley, K., Paltoglou, G.: Sentiment strength detection for the social web. JASIST 63(1) (2012) 163{173.
14. Thelwall, M., Buckley, K., Paltoglou, G.: Sentiment in twitter events. JASIST 62(2) (2011) 406{418.
15. Modgil, S., Toni, F., Bex, F., Bratko, I., Ches̃nevar, C., Dvorak, W., Falappa, M.A., Gaggl, S.A., Garca, A.J., Gonzalez, M.P., Gordon, T.F., Leite, J., Mozina, M., Reed, C., Simari, G.R., Szeider, S., Torroni, P., Woltran, S.: The Added Value of Argumentation: Examples and Challenges. In: Handbook of Agreement Technologies. Springer (2012) (in press).