We should focus on the biases that matter: A reply to commentaries

Journal of Mathematical Psychology

Volumn 57, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 190-195

  Francis, Gregory ^a  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84886727093     PISSN: 00222496     EISSN: 10960880     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmp.2013.06.001     Document Type: Note

References (15)

1. Bem D.J. Feeling the future: experimental evidence for anomalous retroactive influences on cognition and affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2011, 100:407-425.
2. Francis G. Too good to be true: publication bias in two prominent studies from experimental psychology. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2012, 19:151-156.
3. Francis G. Publication bias and the failure of replication in experimental psychology. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2012, 19(6):975-991. 10.3758/s13423-012-0322-y.
4. Francis G. The psychology of replication and replication in psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science 2012, 7(6):580-589. 10.1177/1745691612459520.
5. Francis G. Replication, statistical consistency, and publication bias. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 2013, 57(5):153-169.
6. Gelman A. Interrogating p-values. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 2013, 57(5):188-189.
7. Ioannidis J.P.A. Clarifications on the application and interpretation of the test for excess significance and its extensions. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 2013, 57(5):184-187.
8. Ioannidis J.P.A., Trikalinos T.A. An exploratory test for an excess of significant findings. Clinical Trials 2007, 4:245-253.
9. Johnson V.E. On biases in assessing replicability, statistical consistency and publication bias. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 2013, 57(5):177-179.
10. Morey R.D. The consistency test does not- and cannot-deliver what is advertised: a comment on Francis (2013). Journal of Mathematical Psychology 2013, 57(5):180-183.
11. Simonsohn U. It does not follow: evaluating the one-off publication bias critiques by Francis (2012a, b, c, d, e, f). Perspectives on Psychological Science 2012, 7(6):597-599.
12. Simonsohn U. It really just does not follow, comments on Francis (2013). Journal of Mathematical Psychology 2013, 57(5):174-176.
13. Simonsohn U., Nelson L., Simmons J. P-curve: a key to the file drawer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2013, in press.
14. Topolinski S., Sparenberg P. Turning the hands of time: clockwise movements increase preference for novelty. Social Psychological and Personality Science 2012, 3:308-314.
15. Vandekerckhove J., Guan M., Styrcula S.A. The consistency test may be too weak to be useful: its systematic application would not improve effect size estimation in meta-analyses. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 2013, 57(5):170-173.