Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process Using Type-2 Fuzzy Sets: An Application to Warehouse Location Selection

Multicriteria Decision Aid and Artificial Intelligence

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 285-308

  Uçal Sarý, Irem ^a   Öztayşi, Başar ^a   Kahraman, Cengiz ^a  

^a ISTANBUL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Buckley's type 1 fuzzy AHP; Decision making; Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (AHP); Multicriteria selection; Type 2 fuzzy sets

Indexed keywords

EID: 84886682766     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9781118522516.ch12     Document Type: Chapter

References (83)

1. Almeida AT and Vetschera R (2012) A note on scale transformations in the PROMETHEE V method. European Journal of Operational Research 129(1), 198-200.
2. Behzadian M, Kazemzadeh RB, Albadvi A and Aghdasi M (2010) PROMETHEE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications. European Journal of Operational Research 200(1), 198-215.
3. Birgn S, Kahraman C and Glen KG (2010) Fuzzy productivity measurement in production systems. In Production Engineering and Management Under Fuzziness (eds Kahraman C and Yavuz M). Springer, Berlin, pp. 417-430.
4. Boender CGE, de Graan JG and Lootsma FA (1989) Multicriteria decision analysis with fuzzy pairwise comparisons. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 29, 133-143.
5. Bojković N, Anić I and Pejčić-Tarle S (2010) One solution for cross-country transport-sustainability evaluation using a modified ELECTRE method. Ecological Economics 69(5), 1176-1186.
6. Bozbura FT, Beskse A and Kahraman C (2007) Prioritization of human capital measurement indicators using fuzzy AHP. Expert Systems with Applications 32(4), 1100-1112.
7. Bozdag CE, Kahraman C and Ruan D (2003) Fuzzy group decision making for selection among computer integrated manufacturing systems. Computers in Industry 51(1), 13-29.
8. Brans JP and Mareschal B (2005) PROMETHEE methods. In Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis-State of the Art Surveys (eds Figueira J, Greco S and Ehrgott M). Springer, Boston, pp. 163-195.
9. Brito AJ and Almeida AT (2012) Modeling a multi-attribute utility news vendor with partial backlogging. European Journal of Operational Research 220(3), 820-830.
10. Brito AJ, Almeida AT and Mota CMM (2010) A multi criteria model for risk sorting of natural gas pipelines based on ELECTRE TRI integrating utility theory. European Journal of Operational Research 200(3), 812-.
11. Buckley JJ (1985) Fuzzy hierarchical analysis. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 17, 233-247.
12. Bulut E, Duru O, Keçeci T and Yoshida S (2012) Use of consistency index, expert prioritization and direct numerical inputs for generic fuzzy-AHP modeling: A process model for shipping asset management. Expert Systems with Applications 39(2), 1911-1923.
13. B̈uÿuk̈ozkan G and Ç ifçi G (2012) A novel hybrid MCDM approach based on fuzzy DEMATEL, fuzzy ANP and fuzzy TOPSIS to evaluate green suppliers. Expert Systems with Applications 39(3), 3000-3011.
14. B̈uÿuk̈ozkan G, Kahraman C and Ruan D (2004) A fuzzy multicriteria decision approach for software development strategy selection. International Journal of General Systems 33, 259-280.
15. Celik M, Cebi S, Kahraman C and Er DI (2009) Application of axiomatic design and TOPSIS methodologies under fuzzy environment for proposing competitive strategies on Turkish container ports in maritime transportation network. Expert Systems with Applications 36(3), 4541-4557.
16. Chan FTS, Chan MH and Tang NKH (2000) Evaluation methodologies for technology selection. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 107, 330-337.
17. Chang DY (1996) Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP. European Journal of Operational Research 95, 649-655.
18. Chen SH and Hsieh CH (1999) Graded mean integration representation of generalized fuzzy number. Journal of the Chinese Fuzzy System Association 5, 1-7.
19. Chen SJ and Hwang CL (1991) Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
20. Chen SM and Lee LW(2010) Fuzzy multiple attributes group decision-making based on the interval type-2 TOPSIS method. Expert Systems with Applications 37, 2790-2798.
21. Chen TY (2012) Comparative analysis of SAW and TOPSIS based on interval-valued fuzzy sets: Discussions on score functions and weight constraints. Expert Systems with Applications 39(2), 1848-1861.
22. Cheng CH (1996) Evaluating naval tactical missile systems by fuzzy AHP based on the grade value of membership function. European Journal of Operational Research 96(2), 343-350.
23. Cheng CH, Yang KL and Hwang CL (1999) Evaluating attack helicopters by AHP based on linguistic variable weight. European Journal of Operational Research 116(2), 423-435.
24. Dong X and Hayes CC (2012) Uncertainty visualizations: Helping decision makers become more aware of uncertainty and its implications. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making 6(1), 30-56.
25. Duckstein L and Opricovic S (1980) Multiobjective optimization in river basin development. Water Resources Research 16(1), 14-20.
26. Fishburn PC (1967) Additive utilities with incomplete product set: Applications to priorities and assignments. Operations Research 15, 537-542.
27. Gungor Z, Serhatlioǧlu G and Kesen SE (2009) A fuzzy AHP approach to personnel selection problem. Applied Soft Computing 9(2), 641-646.
28. Halouani N, Chabchoub H and Martel JM (2009) PROMETHEE-MD-2T method for project selection. European Journal of Operational Research 195(3), 841-849.
29. Haq AN and Kannan G (2006) Fuzzy analytical hierarchy process for evaluating and selecting a vendor in a supply chain model. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 29, 826-835.
30. Hatami-Marbini A and Tavana T (2011) An extension of the ELECTRE I method for group decision-making under a fuzzy environment. Omega 39(4), 841-849.
31. He Y and Huang RH (2008) Risk attributes theory: Decision making under risk. European Journal of Operational Research 186(1), 243-260.
32. Hsieh TY, Lu ST and Tzeng GH (2004) Fuzzy MCDM approach for planning and design tenders selection in public office buildings. International Journal of Project Management 22, 573-584.
33. Javanbarg MB, Scawthorn C, Kiyono J and Shahbodaghkhan B (2012) Fuzzy AHP-based multicriteria decision making systems using particle swarm optimization. Expert Systems with Applications 39(1), 960-966.
34. Kahraman C, Beskese A and Kaya I (2010) Selection among ERP outsourcing alternatives using a fuzzy multi-criteria decision making methodology. International Journal of Production Research 48(2), 547-.
35. Kahraman C, Cebeci U and Ruan D (2004) Multi-attribute comparison of catering service companies using fuzzy AHP: The case of Turkey. International Journal of Production Economics 87, 171-184.
36. Kahraman C, G̈ulbay M and Kabak ̈O (2006) Application of fuzzy sets in industrial engineering: A topical classification. In Fuzzy Applications in Industrial Engineering (ed. Kahraman C). Springer, Berlin, pp. 1-55.
37. Kahraman C and Kaya I (2010a) Fuzzy acceptance sampling plans. In Production Engineering and Management under Fuzziness (eds Kahraman C and Yavuz M). Springer, Berlin, pp. 457-481.
38. Kahraman C and Kaya I (2010b) A fuzzy multicriteria methodology for selection among energy alternatives. Expert Systems with Applications 37(9), 6270-6281.
39. Kahraman C, Ruan D and Doǧan I (2003) Fuzzy group decision-making for facility location selection. Information Sciences 157, 135-153.
40. Kahraman C, Ulukan Z and Tolga E (1998) A fuzzy weighted evaluation method using objective and subjective measures. In Proceedings of the International ICSC Symposium on Engineering of Intelligent Systems (EIS '98), vol. 1. University of La Laguna, Tenerife, pp. 57-63.
41. Kang C and Feng CM (2009) Risk measurement and risk identification for BOT projects: A multi-attribute utility approach. Mathematical and Computer Modelling 49(9-10), 1802-1815.
42. Kaya T and Kahraman C (2011a) Fuzzy multiple criteria forestry decision making based on an integrated VIKOR and AHP approach. Expert Systems with Applications 38(6), 7326-7333.
43. Kaya T and Kahraman C (2011b) An integrated fuzzy AHP-ELECTRE methodology for environmental impact assessment. Expert Systems with Applications 38(7), 8553-8562.
44. Kayakutlu G and B̈uÿuk̈ozkan G (2008) Assessing knowledge-based resources in a utility company: Identify and prioritise the balancing factors. Energy 33, 1027-1037.
45. Krohling RA and Campanharo VC (2011) Fuzzy TOPSIS for group decision making: A case study for accidents with oil spill in the sea. Expert Systems with Applications 38(4), 4190-4197.
46. Kulak O and Kahraman C (2005) Fuzzy multi-attribute selection among transportation companies using axiomatic design and analytic hierarchy process. Information Sciences 170, 191-210.
47. Kutlu AC and Ekmekçioǧlu M (2012) Fuzzy failure modes and effects analysis by using fuzzy TOPSIS-based fuzzy AHP. Expert Systems with Applications 39(1), 61-67.
48. Lee S, Kim W, Kim YM and Oh KJ (2012) Using AHP to determine intangible priority factors for technology transfer adoption. Expert Systems with Applications 39(7), 6388-6395.
49. Leung LC and Cao D (2000) On consistency and ranking of alternatives in fuzzy AHP. European Journal of Operational Research 124, 102-113.
50. Li TS and Huang HH (2009) Applying TRIZ and fuzzy AHP to develop innovative design for automated manufacturing systems. Expert Systems with Applications 36(4), 8302-8312.
51. Lin HF (2010) An application of fuzzy ahp for evaluating course website quality. Computers & Education 54, 877-888.
52. Løkena E, Botterudb A and Holena AT (2009) Use of the equivalent attribute technique in multicriteria planning of local energy systems. European Journal of Operational Research 197(3), 1075-1083.
53. Malak RJ, Aughenbaugh MJ and Paredis JJC (2009) Multi-attribute utility analysis in set-based conceptual design. Computer-Aided Design 197(3), 214-227.
54. Mateo JRSC (2012)Weighted sum method and weighted product method. In Multi Criteria Analysis in the Renewable Energy Industry (eds Mateo JRSC and Ramón J). Springer, Berlin, pp. 19-22.
55. Mendel JM and John RIB (2002) Type-2 fuzzy sets made simple. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems 10(2), 117-127.
56. Mendel JM, John RIB and Liu FL (2006) Interval type-2 fuzzy logical systems made simple. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems 14(6), 808-821.
57. Montazer AG, Saremi HQ and Ramezani M (2009) Design a new mixed expert decision aiding system using fuzzy ELECTRE III method for vendor selection. Expert Systems with Applications 36(8), 10837-10847.
58. Rajput HC, Milani AS and Labun A (2011) Including time dependency and ANOVA in decisionmaking using the revised fuzzy AHP: A case study on wafer fabrication process selection. Applied Soft Computing 11(8), 5099-5109.
59. Ramesha S, Kannanb S and Baskarc S (2012) Application of modified NSGA-II algorithm to multi-objective reactive power planning. Applied Soft Computing 12, 741-753.
60. Rong C, Takashi K and Wang J (2003) Enterprise waste evaluation using the analytic hierarchy process and fuzzy set theory. Production Planning and Control 14(1), 90-103.
61. Roy B (2005) Paradigms and challanges. In Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis-State of the Art Surveys (eds Figueira J, Greco S and Ehrgott M). Springer, Boston, pp. 3-24.
62. Saaty TL (1980) The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill, New York.
63. Saaty TL (1990) How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operations Research 48, 9-26.
64. Saaty TL (2008) Decision Making for Leaders: The Analytic Hierarchy Process for Decisions in a Complex World. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh.
65. Stam A, Minghe S and Haines M (1996) Artificial neural network representations for hierarchical preference structures. Computers and Operations Research 23(12), 1191-1201.
66. Torlak G, Sevkli M, Sanal M and S. Z (2011) Analyzing business competition by using fuzzy TOPSIS method: An example of Turkish domestic airline industry. Expert Systems with Applications 38(4), 3396-3406.
67. Triantaphyllou E (2000) Multi-criteria Decision Making Methods: A Comparative Study. Kluwer Academic Publishers, New York.
68. Tsaur SH, Chang TY and Yen CH (2002) The evaluation of airline service quality by fuzzy MCDM. Tourism Management 23, 107-115.
69. Tseng ML, Lin YH, Chiu AS and Chen CY (2008) Fuzzy AHP-approach to TQM strategy evaluation. Industrial Engineering and Management Systems: An International Journal 7(1), 34-43.
70. van Laarhoven PJM and Pedrycz W (1983) A fuzzy extension of Saaty's priority theory. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 11, 229-241.
71. Vázqueza ALJ, Cantob EB and A. M (2008) Optimal design and operation of a wastewater purification system. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation 79(3), 668-682.
72. Vetschera R and Almeida AT (2012) A PROMETHEE-based approach to portfolio selection problems. Computers & Operations Research 39(5), 1010-.
73. Vincke P (1992) Multicriteria Decision Aid. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, New York.
74. Wang M, Lin SJ and Lo YC (2010) The comparison between MAUT and PROMETHEE. In Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM), pp. 753-757.
75. Wu MC and Chen TY (2011) The ELECTRE multicriteria analysis approach based on Atanassov's intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Expert Systems with Applications 38(10), 12318-12327.
76. Yilmaz B and Daǧdeviren M (2011) A combined approach for equipment selection: FPROMETHEE method and zero-one goal programming. Expert Systems with Applications 38(9), 11641-11650.
77. Yoon KP and Hwang CL (1995) Multiple Attribute Decision Making: An Introduction. Sage Publications, London.
78. Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Information and Control 8(3), 338-353.
79. Zadeh LA (1975) The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning-i. Information and Control 8(3), 199-249.
80. Zeng J, Min A and Smith NJ (2007) Application of fuzzy based decision making methodology to construction project risk assessment. International Journal of Project Management 25, 589-600.
81. Zhu KJ, Jing Y and Chang DY (1999) A discussion of extent analysis method and applications of fuzzy AHP. European Journal of Operational Research 116, 450-456.
82. Zimmermann HJ (1996) Fuzzy Set Theory and its Applications. Kluwer, Boston.
83. Zolghadri M, Amrani A, Zouggar S and Girard P (2011) Power assessment as a high-level partner selection criterion for new product development projects. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing 24(4), 312-327.