Methods of performance evaluation for the supervised classification of satellite imagery in determining land cover classes;Métodos de evaluación de desempeño para la clasif cación supervisada de imágenes satelitales en la determinación de las clases de cobertura terrestre

Ciencia e Investigacion Agraria

Volumn 40, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 419-428

  De Souza, Carlos H Wachholz ^a   Mercante, Erivelto ^a   Prudente, Victor H R ^a   Justina, Diego D D ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DO OESTE DO PARANÁ   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Accuracy indices; Agricultural landscape; Classifiers; Remote sensing

Indexed keywords

EID: 84886678114     PISSN: 03045609     EISSN: 07181620     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4067/S0718-16202013000200016     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Bakr, N., D.C. Weindorf, M.H. Bahnassy, S.M. Ma-rei, and M.M. El-Badawi. 2010. Monitoring land cover changes in a newly reclaimed area of Egypt using multi-temporal Landsat data. Applied Geography 30:592-605.
2. Belluco, E., M. Camuffo, S. Ferrari, L. Modenese, S. Silvestri, A. Marani, and M. Marani. 2006. Mapping salt-marsh vegetation by multispectral and hyperspectral remote sensing. Remote Sensing of Environment 105: 54-67.
3. Brian, W.S., Qi Chen, and B. Michael. 2011. A comparison of classification techniques to support land cover and land use analysis in tropical coastal zones. Applied Geography 31:525-532.
4. Castillejo-González, I.L., F. López-Granados, A. Gar-cía-Ferrer, J.M. Peña-Barragán, M. Jurado-Ex-pósito, M.S. Orden, and M. González-Audicana. 2009. Object - and pixel-based analysis for mapping crops and their agro-environmental associated measures using Quick Bird imagery. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 68: 207-215.
5. Chander, G., B.L. Markham, and D.L. Helder. 2009. Summary of current radiometric calibration Co-effcients for Landsat MSS, TM, ETM+, and EO-1 ALI sensors. Remote Sensing of Environment 113: 893-903.
6. Cohen, J.A. 1960. Coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement 20:37-46.
7. Congalton, R.G. 1991. A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data. Remote Sensing of Environment 37:35-46.
8. Cruz, E.S. 2008. Comparação de classifcadores de imagens digitais na determinação da cobertura do solo. Engenharia Agrícola 28: 237-244.
9. Dalposso, G.H., M.A. Uribe-Opazo, E. Mercante, J.A. Johann, and J.A. Borssoi. 2012. Comparison measures of maps generated by geostatistical methods. Engenharia Agrícola 32: 174-183.
10. EMBRAPA. 2006. Sistema brasileiro de classif-cação de solo. Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (EMBRAPA). 2 edição. Rio de Janeiro, Brasil. 306 pp.
11. Fielding, A.H., and J.F. Bell. 1997. A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models. Environmental Conservation 24:38-49.
12. Foody, G.M. 2002. Status of land cover classification accuracy assessment. Remote Sensing of Environment 80:185-201.
13. GLCF. 2012. Global Land Cover Facility. Department of Geography. University of Maryland. Available online at: http://glcf.umd.edu/data/. (Web accessed: January, 2012).
14. Hubert-Moy, L., A. Cotonnec, L. Le Du, A. Chardin, and P. Perez. 2001. A Comparison of Parametric Classification Procedures of Remotely Sensed Data Applied on Different Landscape Units. Remote Sensing of Environment 75:174-187.
15. IAPAR. 2000. Cartas climáticas básicas do Estado do Paraná. Instituto Agronômico do Paraná (IAPAR). Londrina, Brasil. Available online at: www.iapar.br (Website accessed: January 2012).
16. Janssen, L. L. F., and J. M. Van Der Wel. 1994. Accuracy assessment of satellite derived land-cover data: a review. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 60:419-426.
17. Jenness, J., and J. J. Wynne. 2005. Cohen's Kappa and classification table metrics 2.0: na ArcView 3x extension for accuracy assessment of spatially explicit models. U. S. Geological Survey, Southwest Biological Science Center, Flagstaff, AZ. 86 pp.
18. Landis, J.R., and G.G. Koch. 1977. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159-174.
19. Lu, D., P. Mausel, E. Brondízio, and E. Moran. 2004. Change detection techniques. International Journal of Remote Sensing 25:2365-2407.
20. Luiz, A.J.B., J.C. Oliveira, J.C.N. Epiphanio, and A.R. Formaggio. 2002. Auxílio das imagens de satélite aos levantamentos por amostragem em agricultura. Agricultura em São Paulo 49:41-54.
21. Lurz, P.W.W., S.P. Rushton, L.A. Wauters, S. Ber-tolino, I. Currado, P. Mazzoglio, and M.D.F. Shirley. 2001. Predicting grey squirrel expansion in North Italy: a spatially explicit modeling approach. Landscape Ecology 16:407-420.
22. Ma, Z., and R.L. Redmond. 1995. Tau coefficients for accuracy assessment of classification of remote sensing data. Photogrametric Engineering and Remote Sensing 61:435-439.
23. Pal, M., and P.M. Mather. 2004. Assessment of the effectiveness of support vector machines for hy-perspectral data. Future Generation Computer Systems 20:1215-1225.
24. Richards, J.A., and X. Jia. 1999. Remote sensing digital image analysis: an introduction. 3 Edição. New York: Springer Verlag. 363pp.
25. South, S., J. Qi, and D.P. Lusch. 2004. Optimal classification methods for mapping agricultural tillage practices. Remote Sensing of Environment 91:90-97.
26. Williams, D.L., S. Goward, and T. Arvidson. 2006. Landsat: yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Pho-togrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 72:1171-1178.
27. Yang, C., J.H. Everitt, and D. Murden. 2011. Evaluating high resolution SPOT 5 satellite imagery for crop identification. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 75:347-354.