Association and risk factors between induction of labor and cesarean section

Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine

Volumn 26, Issue 17, 2013, Pages 1733-1736

  Yogev, Yariv ^a,b   Hiersch, Liran ^a,b   Yariv, Or ^a,b   Peled, Yoav ^a,b   Wiznitzer, Arnon ^a,b   Melamed, Nir ^a,b  

^a RABIN MEDICAL CENTER   (Israel)

^b TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

Cesarean section; Failure; Induction; PGE2; Prostaglandin

Indexed keywords

PROSTAGLANDIN E2;

ADULT; AMNION; ARTICLE; BISHOPS SCORE; BODY MASS; CERVICAL LENGTH MEASUREMENT; CESAREAN SECTION; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FETAL GROWTH RESTRICTION; FETUS MONITORING; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMAN; INTRAUTERINE GROWTH RETARDATION; LABOR INDUCTION; LABOR ONSET; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NULLIPARA; OBESITY; OLIGOHYDRAMNIOS; PREGNANCY DIABETES MELLITUS; PREMATURE FETUS MEMBRANE RUPTURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROLONGED PREGNANCY; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; SCORING SYSTEM; UTERINE CERVIX RIPENING;

ADULT; BIRTH WEIGHT; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; CESAREAN SECTION; DINOPROSTONE; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; LABOR STAGE, FIRST; LABOR STAGE, SECOND; LABOR, INDUCED; PREGNANCY; RISK FACTORS; TREATMENT FAILURE;

EID: 84886621456     PISSN: 14767058     EISSN: 14764954     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/14767058.2013.799661     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Sutton PD, et al. Births: Final data for 2007. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2010;58:1-85.
2. Zhang J, Yancey MK, Henderson CE. U.S. national trends in labor induction, 1989-1998. J Reprod Med 2002;47:120-4.
3. Vardo JH, Thornburg LL, Glantz JC. Maternal and neonatal morbidity among nulliparous women undergoing elective induction of labor. J Reprod Med 2011;56:25-30.
4. Seyb ST, Berka RJ, Socol ML, Dooley SL. Risk of cesarean delivery with elective induction of labor at term in nulliparous women. Obstet Gynecol 1999;94:600-7.
5. Yeast JD, Jones A, Poskin M. Induction of labor and the relationship to cesarean delivery: A review of 7001 consecutive inductions. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;180:628-33.
6. Johnson DP, Davis NR, Brown AJ. Risk of cesarean delivery after induction at term in nulliparous women with an unfavorable cervix. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;188:1565-9; discussion 69-72.
7. Vahratian A, Zhang J, Troendle JF, et al. Labor progression and risk of cesarean delivery in electively induced nulliparas. Obstet Gynecol 2005;105:698-704.
8. Melamed N, Yogev Y, Hadar E, et al. Preinduction cervical ripening with prostaglandin E2 at preterm. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2008;87:63-7.
9. Ben-Haroush A, Yogev Y, Bar J, et al. Indicated labor induction with vaginal prostaglandin E2 increases the risk of cesarean section even in multiparous women with no previous cesarean section. J Perinat Med 2004;32:31-6.
10. Nielsen PE, Howard BC, Hill CC, et al. Comparison of elective induction of labor with favorable Bishop scores versus expectant management: A randomized clinical trial. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2005;18:59-64.
11. Vrouenraets FP, Roumen FJ, Dehing CJ, et al. Bishop score and risk of cesarean delivery after induction of labor in nulliparous women. Obstet Gynecol 2005;105:690-7.
12. Osmundson SS, Ou-Yang RJ, Grobman WA. Elective induction compared with expectant management in nulliparous women with a favorable cervix. Obstet Gynecol 2010;116:601-5.
13. Osmundson S, Ou-Yang RJ, Grobman WA. Elective induction compared with expectant management in nulliparous women with an unfavorable cervix. Obstet Gynecol 2011;117:583-7.
14. Prysak M, Castronova FC. Elective induction versus spontaneous labor: A case-control analysis of safety and efficacy. Obstet Gynecol 1998;92:47-52.
15. Koopmans CM, Bijlenga D, Groen H, et al. Induction of labour versus expectant monitoring for gestational hypertension or mild pre-eclampsia after 36 weeks' gestation (HYPITAT): A multicentre, open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2009;374:979-88.
16. Boers KE, Vijgen SM, Bijlenga D, et al. Induction versus expectant monitoring for intrauterine growth restriction at term: Randomised equivalence trial (DIGITAT). Br Med J 2010;341:c7087.
17. Peregrine E, O'Brien P, Omar R, Jauniaux E. Clinical and ultrasound parameters to predict the risk of cesarean delivery after induction of labor. Obstet Gynecol 2006;107:227-33.
18. Smith LP, Nagourney BA, Mclean FH, Usher RH. Hazards and benefits of elective induction of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984; 148:579-85.
19. Maslow AS, Sweeny AL. Elective induction of labor as a risk factor for cesarean delivery among low-risk women at term. Obstet Gynecol 2000;95:917-22.
20. Dublin S, Lydon-Rochelle M, Kaplan RC, et al. Maternal and neonatal outcomes after induction of labor without an identified indication. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;183:986-94.
21. Cammu H, Martens G, Ruyssinck G, Amy JJ. Outcome after elective labor induction in nulliparous women: A matched cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;186:240-4.
22. Caughey AB, Nicholson JM, Cheng YW, et al. Induction of labor and cesarean delivery by gestational age. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006;195:700-5.