Competitive binding of natural amphiphiles with graphene derivatives

Scientific Reports

Volumn 3, Issue , 2013, Pages

  Radic, Slaven ^a   Geitner, Nicholas K ^a   Podila, Ramakrishna ^a   Käkinen, Aleksandr ^b,c   Chen, Pengyu ^a,d   Ke, Pu Chun ^a   Ding, Feng ^a  

^a CLEMSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS AND BIOPHYSICS   (Estonia)

^c TALLINN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Estonia)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GRAPHITE; NANOMATERIAL; OXIDE; SURFACTANT;

ARTICLE; BINDING COMPETITION; CHEMISTRY; CONFORMATION; INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; RAMAN SPECTROMETRY; TEMPERATURE; THERMODYNAMICS;

BINDING, COMPETITIVE; GRAPHITE; MOLECULAR CONFORMATION; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS SIMULATION; NANOSTRUCTURES; OXIDES; SPECTROSCOPY, FOURIER TRANSFORM INFRARED; SPECTRUM ANALYSIS, RAMAN; SURFACE-ACTIVE AGENTS; TEMPERATURE; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 84886518489     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/srep02273     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Novoselov, K. S. et al. Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films. Science 306, 666-669 (2004).
2. Huang, X. et al. Graphene-based materials: synthesis, characterization, properties, and applications. Small 7, 1876-1902 (2011).
3. Geim, A. K. Graphene: status and prospects. Science 324, 1530-1534 (2009).
4. He, Q., Wu, S., Yin, Z. & Zhang, H. Graphene-based electronic sensors. Chem. Sci. 3, 1764-1772 (2012).
5. Yang, W. et al. Carbon Nanomaterials in biosensors: should you use nanotubes or graphene? Angew. Chem.-Int. Edit. 49, 2114-2138 (2010).
6. Qiu, J.-D., Huang, J. & Liang, R.-P. Nanocomposite film based on graphene oxide for high performance flexible glucose biosensor. Sens. Actuator B-Chem. 160, 287-294 (2011).
7. Morales-Narvaez, E. & Merkoci, A. Graphene oxide as an optical biosensing platform. Adv. Mater. 24, 3298-3308 (2012).
8. Yang, K., Feng, L., Shi, X. & Liu, Z. Nano-graphene in biomedicine: theranostic applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 42, 530-547 (2013).
9. Sivudu, K. S. & Mahajan, Y. Mass production of high quality graphene: An analysis of worldwide patents, http://www.nanowerk.com/spotlight/spotid525744.php (2012).
10. The Global Market for Graphene to 2020, Future Markets, Inc., http://www.researchandmarkets.com/reports/2492343 (2013).
11. Wang, K. et al. Biocompatibility of graphene oxide. Nanoscale Research Letters 6, 8 (2010).
12. Cedervall, T. et al. Understanding the nanoparticle-protein corona using methods to quantify exchange rates and affinities of proteins for nanoparticles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 104, 2050-2055 (2007).
13. Ke, P. C. Fiddling the string of carbon nanotubes with amphiphiles. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 9, 439-447 (2007).
14. Hlady, V. & Buijs, J. Protein adsorption on solid surfaces. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 7, 72-77 (1996).
15. Liu, Z., and Robinson., J. T., Sun, X. & Dai, H. PEGylated nanographene oxide for delivery of water-insoluble cancer drugs. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 10876-10877 (2008).
16. Erickson, K. et al. Determination of the local chemical structure of graphene oxide and reduced graphene oxide. Adv. Mater. 22, 4467-4472 (2010).
17. Pacilé, D. et al. Electronic properties and atomic structure of graphene oxide membranes. Carbon 49, 966-972 (2011).
18. Katoch, J. et al. Structure of a peptide adsorbed on graphene and graphite. Nano Lett. 12, 2342-2346 (2012).
19. Kim, S. N. et al. Preferential binding of peptides to graphene edges and planes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 14480-14483 (2011).
20. Pandey, R. B., Kuang, Z., Farmer, B. L., Kim, S. S. & Naik, R. R. Stability of peptide (P1 and P2) binding to a graphene sheet via an all-atom to all-residue coarsegrained approach. Soft Matter 8, 9101-9109 (2012).
21. Qin, W., Li, X., Bian, W.-W., Fan, X.-J. & Qi, J.-Y. Density functional theory calculations and molecular dynamics simulations of the adsorption of biomolecules on graphene surfaces. Biomaterials 31, 1007-1016 (2010).
22. Rapaport, D. C. The art of molecular dynamics simulation (Cambridge University Press, 2004).
23. Ding, F. & Dokholyan, N. V. Emergence of protein fold families through rational design. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2, e85 (2006).
24. Lazaridis, T. & Karplus, M. Effective energy functions for protein structure prediction. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 10, 139-145 (2000).
25. Ding, F., Tsao, D., Nie, H. & Dokholyan, N. V. Ab initio folding of proteins with all-atom discrete molecular dynamics. Structure 16, 1010-1018 (2008).
26. Ding, F., Furukawa, Y., Nukina, N. & Dokholyan, N. V. Local unfolding of Cu, Zn superoxide dismutase monomer determines the morphology of fibrillar aggregates. J. Mol. Biol. 421, 548-560 (2012).
27. Nishiyama, Y., Sugiyama, J., Chanzy, H. & Langan, P. Crystal structure and hydrogen bonding system in cellulose Ia from synchrotron X-ray and neutron fiber diffraction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125, 14300-14306 (2003).
28. Metropolis, N. & Ulam, S. The Monte Carlo method. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 44, 335-341 (1949).
29. Chodera, J. D., and Swope., W. C., Pitera, J. W., Seok, C. & Dill, K. A. Use of the weighted histogram analysis method for the analysis of simulated and parallel tempering simulations. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 3, 26-41 (2007).
30. Chen, P., and Powell., B. A., Mortimer, M. & Ke, P. C. Adaptive interactions between zinc oxide nanoparticles and Chlorella sp. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46, 12178-12185 (2012).
31. Podila, R., Vedantam, P., Ke, P. C., Brown, J. M. & Rao, A. M. Evidences for charge transfer-induced conformational changes in carbon nanostructure-protein corona. J. Phys. Chem. C Nanomater Interfaces 116, 22098-22103 (2012).
32. Park, S. & Ruoff, R. S. Chemical methods for the production of graphenes. Nature Nanotech. 4, 217-224 (2009).
33. Podila, R., Rao, R., Tsuchikawa, R., Ishigami, M. & Rao, A. M. Raman spectroscopy of folded and scrolled graphene. ACS Nano 6, 5784-5790 (2012).
34. Haas, A. F. & Wild, C. Composition analysis of organic matter released by cosmopolitan coral reef-associated green algae. Aquat. Biol. 10, 131-138 (2010).
35. Milani, S., and Bombelli., F. B., Pitek, A. S., Dawson, K. A. & Raedler, J. Reversible versus irreversible binding of transferrin to polystyrene nanoparticles: soft and hard corona. ACS Nano 6, 2532-2541 (2012).
36. Humphrey, W., Dalke, A. & Schulten, K. VMD: Visual molecular dynamics. J. Mol. Graphics 14, 33-38 (1996).
37. Hanwell, M. D., and Curtis., D. E., Lonie, D. C., Vandermeersch, T., Zurek, E. & Hutchison, G. R. Avogadro: an advanced semantic chemical editor, visualization, and analysis platform. J. Cheminformatics 4, 17 (2012).
38. Loh, K. P., and Bao., Q. L., Eda, G. & Chhowalla, M. Graphene oxide as a chemically tunable platform for optical applications. Nature Chem. 2, 1015-1024 (2012).
39. Bagri, A., Mattevi, C., Acik, M., Chabal, Y. J., Chhowalla, M. & Shenoy, V. B. Structural evolution during the reduction of chemically derived graphene oxide. Nature Chem. 2, 581-587 (2010).
40. Dreyer, D. R., Park, S., Bielawski, C. W. & Ruoff, R. S. The chemistry of graphene oxide. Chem. Soc. Rev. 39, 228-240 (2010).
41. Halgren, T. A. MMFF VI. MMFF94s option for energy minimization studies. J. Comput. Chem. 20, 720-729 (1999).
42. O'Boyle, N. M., Banck, M., James, C. A., Morley, C., Vandermeersch, T. & Hutchison, G. R. Open babel: an open chemical toolbox. J. Cheminformatics 3, 33 (2011).
43. Yin, S., Biedermannova, L., Vondrasek, J. & Dokholyan, N. V. MedusaScore: an accurate force-field based scoring function for virtual drug screening. J. Chem. Inf. Model 48, 1656-1662 (2008).
44. Ding, F. & Dokholyan, N. V. Emergence of protein fold families through rational design. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2, e85 (2006).
45. Proctor, E. A., Ding, F. & Dokholyan, N. V. Structural and thermodynamic effects of post-translational modifications in mutant and wild type Cu, Zn superoxide dismutase. J. Mol. Biol. 408, 555-567 (2011).
46. Kumar, S., and Rosenberg., J. M., Bouzida, D., Swendsen, R. H. & Kollman, P. A. The weighted histogram analysis method for free energy calculations on biomolecules. I. The method. J. Comput. Chem. 13, 1011-1021 (1992).
47. Chodera, J. D., and Swope., W. C., Pitera, J. W., Seok, C. & Dill, K. A. Use of the weighted histogram analysis method for the analysis of simulated and parallel tempering simulations. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 3, 26-41 (2007).