An fMRI-compatible multi-configurable handheld response system using an intensity-modulated fiber-optic sensor

Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBS

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 6349-6352

  Jarrahi, Behnaz ^a,b,c   Wanek, Johann ^b   Mehnert, Ulrich ^c   Kollias, Spyros ^c  

^a ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b BALGRIST UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Switzerland)

^c UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESPONSE; ECHO PLANAR IMAGING; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; INTENSITY-MODULATED; MAGNETIC ENVIRONMENTS; OPTO-MECHANICAL DESIGN; OPTO-MECHANICAL SYSTEMS; PERFORMANCE EFFICIENCY;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; DESIGN; FIBER OPTIC SENSORS; SCANNING;

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;

ECHO-PLANAR IMAGING; FIBER OPTIC TECHNOLOGY; HUMANS; INSTRUMENTATION; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; METHODS; SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO; SOFTWARE;

ECHO-PLANAR IMAGING; FIBER OPTIC TECHNOLOGY; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO; SOFTWARE;

EID: 84886487497     PISSN: 1557170X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/EMBC.2013.6611006     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. E. Amaro, G. Barker, et al., "Study design in fmri: Basic principles, " Brain and cognition, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 220-232, 2006.
2. M. Tada and T. Kanade, "Development of an mr-compatible optical force sensor, " in Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2004. IEMBS'04. 26th Annual International Conference of the IEEE, vol. 1. IEEE, 2004, pp. 2022-2025.
3. J. Meinhardt and J. Müller, "Motor response detection using fiber optics during functional magnetic resonance imaging, " Behavior Research Methods, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 556-558, 2001.
4. G. Schaefers, "Testing mr safety and compatibility: an overview of the methods and current standards." IEEE engineering in medicine and biology magazine: The quarterly magazine of the Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society, vol. 27, no. 3, p. 23, 2008.
5. D.ChaffinG.Anderson, Occupational Biomechanics. Wiley, NY, 1984.
6. S. Chengalur, S. Rodgers, and T. Bernard, Kodak's ergonomic design for people at work. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2004.
7. E. Tichauer and H. Gage, "Ergonomic principles basic to hand tool design, " The American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal, vol. 38, no. 11, pp. 622-634, 1977.
8. S. Trewin and H. Pain, "Keyboard and mouse errors due to motor disabilities, " 1999.
9. M. Smith, J. Sharit, and S. Czaja, "Aging, motor control, and the performance of computer mouse tasks, " Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 389-396, 1999.
10. B. Kantowitz and G. Elvers, "Fitts' law with an isometric controller: Effects of order of control and control-display gain." Journal of Motor Behavior, 1988.
11. P. Van Wely, "Design and disease, " Applied Ergonomics, vol. 1, no. 5, pp. 262-269, 1970.
12. R. Weisskoff, "Simple measurement of scanner stability for functional nmr imaging of activation in the brain, " Magnetic resonance in medicine, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 643-645, 2005.