A multi-electrode array coupled with fiberoptic for deep-brain optical neuromodulation and electrical recording

Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBS

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 2752-2755

  Guo, Songchao ^a   Zhou, Hong ^a   Zhang, Jiacheng ^a   Xu, Kedi ^a   Zheng, Xiaoxiang ^a  

^a ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARRAY DEVICES; ELECTRICAL RECORDING; IN-VIVO EXPERIMENTS; INTEGRATED DEVICE; MULTIELECTRODE ARRAYS; NEURAL SIGNALS; NEUROMODULATION; OPTICAL STIMULATION;

ENGINEERING; INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING;

OPTICAL FIBERS;

CHANNELRHODOPSIN 2, RAT; RHODOPSIN;

ANIMAL; BRAIN; BRAIN DEPTH STIMULATION; DEVICES; ELECTRODE; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; FIBER OPTICS; LIGHT RELATED PHENOMENA; MALE; METABOLISM; NEUROPROSTHESIS; PHYSIOLOGY; PROSTHESIS; SPRAGUE DAWLEY RAT;

ANIMALS; BRAIN; DEEP BRAIN STIMULATION; ELECTRODES; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL PHENOMENA; FIBER OPTIC TECHNOLOGY; MALE; NEURAL PROSTHESES; OPTICAL PHENOMENA; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY; RHODOPSIN;

EID: 84886453906     PISSN: 1557170X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/EMBC.2013.6610110     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. Zhang, F., et al., Channelrhodopsin-2 and optical control of excitable cells. Nature Methods, 2006. 3(10): p. 785-792.
2. Zhang, F., et al., Circuit-breakers: optical technologies for probing neural signals and systems. Nature Reviews, 2007. 8: p. 577-581.
3. Kravitz, A.V. and A.C. Kreitzer, Optogenetics manipulation of neural circuitry in vivo. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 2011. 2011(21): p. 433-439.
4. Cardin, J.A., et al., Targeted optogenetic stimulation and recording of neurons in vivo using cell-type-specific expression of Channelrhodopsin-2. Nature Protocol, 2010. 5(2): p. 247-254.
5. ndAnnual International Conference of the IEEE EMBS. 2010: Buenos Aires, Argentina. p. 1569-1572.
6. Nordhausen, C.T., E.M. Maynard, and R.A. Normann, Single unit recording capabilities of a 100 microelectrode array. Brain Research, 1996. 726(1996): p. 129-140.
7. Stieglitz, T. and M. Gross, Flexible BIOMEMS with electrode arrangements on front and back side as key component in neural prosthesis and biohybrid systems. Sensors and Actuators B, 2002. 83(2002): p. 8-14.
8. stAnnual International Conference of the IEEE EMBS. 2009: Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA. p. 2046-2049.
9. Aravanis, A.M., et al., An optical neural interface: in vivo control of rodent motor cortex with integrated fiberoptic and optogenetic technology. Journal of Neural Engineering, 2007. 4(2007): p. 143-156.
10. Wang, J., et al., Integrated device for combined optical neuromodulation and electrical recording for chronic in vivo applications. Journal of Neural Engineering, 2012. 9(2012): p. 1-14.
11. rdAnnual International Conference of the IEEE EMBS. 2011: Boston, Massachusetts, USA. p. 2969-2972.
12. Davis, M.D. and J.J. Schmidt, In vivo spectrometric calcium flux recordings of intrinsic caudate-putamen cells and transplanted IMR-32 neuroblastoma cells using miniature fiber optrodes in anesthetized and awake rats and monkeys. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 2000. 99(2000): p. 9-23.