Mediation analysis in epidemiology: Methods, interpretation and bias

International Journal of Epidemiology

Volumn 42, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 1511-1519

  Richiardi, Lorenzo ^a   Bellocco, Rino ^b,c   Zugna, Daniela ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TURIN   (Italy)

^b KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MILANO BICOCCA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Direct effects; Indirect effects; Mediation analysis

Indexed keywords

EPIDEMIOLOGY; IDENTIFICATION METHOD; NUMERICAL MODEL; POLLUTION EXPOSURE;

ARTICLE; ATTRIBUTABLE RISK; DECOMPOSITION; EPIDEMIOLOGY; EXPOSURE; MEASUREMENT ERROR; OUTCOME VARIABLE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SYSTEMATIC ERROR; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL BIAS;

BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); CAUSALITY; CONFOUNDING FACTORS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; EFFECT MODIFIER, EPIDEMIOLOGIC; EPIDEMIOLOGIC METHODS; EPIDEMIOLOGY; HUMANS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RESEARCH DESIGN;

EID: 84886385839     PISSN: 03005771     EISSN: 14643685     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyt127     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Porta M (ed.). A Dictionary of Epidemiology. 5th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.
2. Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol 1986;51:1173-82.
3. Kaufman JS, Maclehose RF, Kaufman S. A further critique of the analytic strategy of adjusting for covariates to identify biologic mediation. Epidemiol Perspect Innov 2004;1:4.
4. Szklo M, Nieto J. Epidemiology: Beyond the Basic. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett, 2004.
5. Robins JM, Greenland S. Identifiability and exchangeability for direct and indirect effects. Epidemiology 1992;3:143-55.
6. Pearl J. Direct and Indirect Effects. Seventeenth Conference of Uncertainy in Artificial Intelligence, 2001. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann, 2001.
7. Cole SR, Hernan MA. Fallibility in estimating direct effects. Int J Epidemiol 2002;31:163-65.
8. Hernan MA, Hernandez-diaz S, Robins JM. A structural approach to selection bias. Epidemiology 2004;15:615-25.
9. Greenland S, Pearl J, Robins JM. Causal diagrams for epidemiologic research. Epidemiology 1999;10:37-48.
10. Blakely T. Commentary: Estimating direct and indirect effects-fallible in theory, but in the real world? Int J Epidemiol 2002;31:166-67.
11. Greenland S. Quantifying biases in causal models: classical confounding vs collider-stratification bias. Epidemiology 2003;14:300-06.
12. Hafeman DM. Confounding of indirect effects: a sensitivity analysis exploring the range of bias due to a cause common to both the mediator and the outcome. Am J Epidemiol 2011;174:710-17.
13. Vanderweele TJ. Bias formulas for sensitivity analysis for direct and indirect effects. Epidemiology 2010;21:540-51.
14. Pizzi C, De Stavola B, Merletti F et al. Sample selection and validity of exposure-disease association estimates in cohort studies. J Epidemiol Community Health 2012;65: 407-11.
15. Brewer N, Zugna D, Daniel R, Borman B, Pearce N, Richiardi L. Which factors account for the ethnic inequalities in stage at diagnosis and cervical cancer survival in New Zealand? Cancer Epidemiol 2012;36: e251-57.
16. Hafeman DM, Schwartz S. Opening the Black Box: a motivation for the assessment of mediation. Int J Epidemiol 2009;38:838-45.
17. Glymour MM. Using causal diagrams to understand common problems in social epidemiology. In: Oakes JM, Kaufman JS (eds). Methods in Social Epidemiology. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2006.
18. Vanderweele TJ, Robins JM. Directed acyclic graphs, sufficient causes, and the properties of conditioning on a common effect. Am J Epidemiol 2007;166:1096-104.
19. Hernandez-diaz S, Schisterman EF, Hernan MA. The birth weight ''paradox'' uncovered? Am J Epidemiol 2006;164:1115-20.
20. Vanderweele TJ, Mumford SL, Schisterman EF. Conditioning on intermediates in perinatal epidemiology. Epidemiology 2012;23:1-9.
21. Ogburn EL, Vanderweele TJ. Analytic results on the bias due to nondifferential misclassification of a binary mediator. Am J Epidemiol 2012;176:555-61.
22. Petersen ML, Sinisi SE, Van der Laan MJ. Estimation of direct causal effects. Epidemiology 2006;17:276-84.
23. Sjolander A. The language of potential outcomes. In: Sons JW (ed.). Causality: Statistical Perspectives and Applications. Chichester: Wiley, 2012.
24. Rubin DB. Estimating causal effects of treatment in randomized and nonrandomized studies. J Educ Psych 1974; 56:688-701.
25. Vanderweele TJ. A three-way decomposition of a total effect into direct, indirect, and interactive effects. Epidemiology 2013;24:224-32.
26. Pearl J. The causal mediation formula-a guide to the assessment of pathways and mechanisms. Prev Sci 2012; 13:426-36.
27. Vansteelandt S. Estimating direct effects in cohort and case-control studies. Epidemiology 2009;20:851-60.
28. Ambrose JA, Barua RS. The pathophysiology of cigarette smoking and cardiovascular disease: an update. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;43:1731-37.
29. Vanderweele TJ, Hernan MA, Robins JM. Causal directed acyclic graphs and the direction of unmeasured confounding bias. Epidemiology 2008;19:720-28.
30. Robins JM, Hernan MA, Brumback B. Marginal structural models and causal inference in epidemiology. Epidemiology 2000;11:550-60.
31. Hernan MA, Brumback B, Robins JM. Marginal structural models to estimate the causal effect of zidovudine on the survival of HIV-positive men. Epidemiology 2000;11: 561-70.
32. Robins JM. A new approach to causal inference in mortality studies with sustained exposure periods-application to control of the healthy worker survivor effect. Mathe Model 1986;7:1393-512.
33. Vanderweele TJ. Marginal structural models for the estimation of direct and indirect effects. Epidemiology 2009; 20:18-26.
34. Daniel RM, De Stavola B. gformula: Estimating causal effects in the presence of time-varying confounding or mediation using the g-computation formula. STATA J 2011;11:479-517.
35. Susser M, Susser E. Choosing a future for epidemiology: II. From black box to Chinese boxes and eco-epidemiology. Am J Public Health 1996;86:674-77.
36. Victora CG, Huttly SR, Fuchs SC, Olinto MT. The role of conceptual frameworks in epidemiological analysis: a hierarchical approach. Int J Epidemiol 1997;26:224-27.
37. Perera FP, Weinstein IB. Molecular epidemiology and carcinogen- DNA adduct detection: new approaches to studies of human cancer causation. J Chronic Dis 1982;35: 581-600.
38. Pearl J. Interpretable Conditions for Identifying Direct and Indirect Effects. Technical Report R.389. Department of Computer Science, University of California, 2012.
39. Vanderweele TJ. Causal mediation analysis with survival data. Epidemiology 2011;22:582-85.
40. Lange T, Hansen JV. Direct and indirect effects in a survival context. Epidemiology 2011;22:575-81.
41. Lange T, Vansteelandt S, Bekaert M. A simple unified approach for estimating natural direct and indirect effects. Am J Epidemiol 2012;176:190-95.