Optimal temperature for microbes in an acetate fed microbial electrolysis cell (MEC)

International Biodeterioration and Biodegradation

Volumn 85, Issue , 2013, Pages 688-692

  Omidi, Hanieh ^a   Sathasivan, Arumugam ^b  

^a CURTIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

COD removal; Cycle time; MEC; Microorganisms; Temperature

Indexed keywords

BIOMASS CONCENTRATIONS; COD REMOVAL; CYCLE TIME; EFFECT OF TEMPERATURE; MEC; MICROBIAL ELECTROLYSIS CELL (MECS); MICROBIAL ELECTROLYSIS CELLS; VOLATILE SUSPENDED SOLIDS;

DROPS; ELECTROLYTIC CELLS; MICROORGANISMS; TEMPERATURE; VOLATILE FATTY ACIDS;

BIOMASS;

ACETATE; BIOMASS; BIOREACTOR; CELL ORGANELLE; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; ELECTROKINESIS; MICROBIAL ACTIVITY; MICROORGANISM; POLLUTANT REMOVAL; TEMPERATURE EFFECT;

EID: 84886384027     PISSN: 09648305     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ibiod.2013.05.026     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Aboutalebi H., Sathasivan A., Krishna K.C.B., Kohpaei A.J. Expediting COD removal in microbial electrolysis cells by increasing biomass concentration. Bioresource Technology 2011, 102:3981-3984.
2. Chae K.J., Choi M.J., Lee J., Ajayi F.F., Kim I.S. Biohydrogen production via biocatalyzed electrolysis in acetate-fed bioelectrochemical cells and microbial community analysis. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2008, 33:5184-5192.
3. Chae K.J., Choi M.J., Lee J.W., Kim K.Y., Kim I.S. Effect of different substrates on the performance, bacterial diversity, and bacterial viability in microbial fuel cells. Bioresource Technology 2009, 100:3518-3525.
4. Chae K.-J., Choi M.-J., Kim K.-Y., Ajayi F.F., Chang I.-S., Kim I.S. Selective inhibition of methanogens for the improvement of biohydrogen production in microbial electrolysis cells. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2010, 35:13379-13386.
5. Cheng S., Logan B.E. High hydrogen production rate of microbial electrolysis cell (MEC) with reduced electrode spacing. Bioresource Technology 2011, 102:3571-3574.
6. Eaton Andrew D., Franson Mary Ann H., American Water Works Association, Federation W.E. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater 2005, American Public Health Association (APHA), American Water Works Association (AWWA) & Water Environment Federation (WEF), USA.
7. Gander M., Jefferson B., Judd S. Aerobic MBRs for domestic wastewater treatment: a review with cost considerations. Separation and Purification Technology 2000, 18:119-130.
8. Hernandez-Sancho F., Molinos-Senante M., Sala-Garrido R. Cost modelling for wastewater treatment processes. Desalination 2011, 268:1-5.
9. Hu H., Fan Y., Liu H. Hydrogen production using single-chamber membrane-free microbial electrolysis cells. Water Research 2008, 42:4172-4178.
10. Hu H., Fan Y., Liu H. Optimization of NiMo catalyst for hydrogen production in microbial electrolysis cells. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2010, 35:3227-3233.
11. Huang Y.-X., Liu X.-W., Sun X.-F., Sheng G.-P., Zhang Y.-Y., Yan G.-M., Wang S.-G., Xu A.-W., Yu H.-Q. Anew cathodic electrode deposit with palladium nanoparticles for cost-effective hydrogen production in a microbial electrolysis cell. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2011, 36:2773-2776.
12. Jianlong W., Hanchang S., Yi Q. Wastewater treatment in a hybrid biological reactor (HBR): effect of organic loading rates. Process Biochemistry 2000, 36:297-303.
13. Jung S., Regan J. Comparison of anode bacterial communities and performance in microbial fuel cells with different electron donors. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 2007, 77:393-402.
14. Kim J.R., Jung S.H., Regan J.M., Logan B.E. Electricity generation and microbial community analysis of alcohol powered microbial fuel cells. Bioresource Technology 2007, 98:2568-2577.
15. Kyazze G., Popov A., Dinsdale R., Esteves S., Hawkes F., Premier G., Guwy A. Influence of catholyte pH and temperature on hydrogen production from acetate using a two chamber concentric tubular microbial electrolysis cell. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2010, 35:7716-7722.
16. L. Mendoza, P. D. 1999. Thesis. Cranfield University, Bedfordshire, UK.
17. Logan B.E. Exoelectrogenic bacteria that power microbial fuel cells. Nature Reviews Microbiology 2009, 7:375-381.
18. Merrill M.D., Logan B.E. Electrolyte effects on hydrogen evolution and solution resistance in microbial electrolysis cells. Journal of Power Sources 2009, 191:203-208.
19. Metcalf & Eddy Inc. Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Reuse/Metcalf %26 Eddy, Inc 2003, Mc Graw Hill, Boston, USA.
20. Pham T., Boon N., Aelterman P., Clauwaert P., de Schamphelaire L., Vanhaecke L., De Maeyer K., Höfte M., Verstraete W., Rabaey K. Metabolites produced by Pseudomonas sp. enable a Gram-positive bacterium to achieve extracellular electron transfer. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 2008, 77:1119-1129.
21. Rabaey K., Rodriguez J., Blackall L.L., Keller J., Gross P., Batstone D., Verstraete W., Nealson K.H. Microbial ecology meets electrochemistry: electricity-driven and driving communities. ISME Journal 2007, 1:9-18.
22. Tartakovsky B., Manuel M.F., Wang H., Guiot S.R. High rate membrane-less microbial electrolysis cell for continuous hydrogen production. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2009, 34:672-677.
23. Tartakovsky B., Mehta P., Santoyo G., Guiot S.R. Maximizing hydrogen production in a microbial electrolysis cell by real-time optimization of applied voltage. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2011, 36:10557-10564.
24. 2 production. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2010, 35:13481-13487.
25. Zehnder A.J., Brock T.D. Methane formation and methane oxidation by methanogenic bacteria. Journal of Bacteriology 1979, 137:420-432.