In a Word: ERPs Reveal Important Lexical Variables for Visual Word Processing

The Handbook of the Neuropsychology of Language

Volumn 1, Issue , 2012, Pages 184-208

  Lee, Chia Lin ^a   Federmeier, Kara D ^b  

^a MOSS REHABILITATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

Brain electrophysiology measurement; Frequency sensitive negativity (FSN); Lexical frequency; Lexical semantic ambiguity; N400 frequency effect; Noun verb word class effects; Word class, unambiguous items; Word, ERPs revealing lexical variables; Words, language system's building blocks; Words, mapping patterns of lines, curves

Indexed keywords

EID: 84886344487     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9781118432501.ch10     Document Type: Chapter

References (103)

1. Assadollahi, R., & Pulvermüller, F. (2003). Early influences of word length and frequency: A group study using MEG. Neuroreport, 14(8), 1183-1187.
2. Becker, C. A. (1980). Semantic context effects in visual word recognition: An analysis of semantic strategies. Memory and Cognition, 8, 493-512.
3. Belmore, S. M., Yates, J. M., Bellack, D. R., Jones, S. N., & Rosenquist, S. E. (1982). Drawing inferences from concrete and abstract sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21, 338-351.
4. Bentin, S., McCarthy, G., & Wood, C. C. (1985). Event-related potentials, lexical decision and semantic priming. Electroencephalography Clinical Neurophysiology, 60(4), 343-355.
5. Bergen, B. K., Lindsay, S., Matlock, T., & Narayanan, S. (2007). Spatial and linguistic aspects of visual imagery in sentence comprehension. Cognitive Science, 31(5), 733-764.
6. Berndt, R. S., Haendiges, A. N., Mitchum, C. C., & Sandson, J. (1997). Verb retrieval in aphasia. 2. Relationship to sentence processing. Brain and Language, 56(1), 107-137.
7. Besson, M., Kutas, M., & van Petten, C. (1992). An event-related potential (ERP) analysis of semantic congruity and repetition effects in sentences. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 4(2), 132-149.
8. Bird, H., Howard, D., & Franklin, S. (2000). Why is a verb like an inanimate object? Grammatical category and semantic category deficits. Brain and Language, 72(3), 246-309.
9. Bles, M., Alink, A., & Jansma, B. M. (2007). Neural aspects of cohort-size reduction during visual gating. Brain Research, 1150(30), 143-154.
10. Brown, W. S., Lehmann, D., & Marsh, J. T. (1980). Linguistic meaning related differences in evoked potential topography: English, Swiss-German, and imagined. Brain and Language, 11(2), 340-353.
11. Caramazza, A., & Hillis, A. E. (1991). Lexical organization of nouns and verbs in the brain. Nature, 349, 788-790.
12. Dambacher, M., Kliegl, R., Hofmann, M., & Jacobs, A. M. (2006). Frequency and predictability effects on event-related potentials during reading. Brain Research, 1084, 89-103.
13. Dehaene, S. (1995). Electrophysiological evidence for category-specific word processing in the normal human brain. Neuroreport, 6(16), 2153-2157.
14. Duffy, S. A., Kambe, G., & Rayner, K. (2001). The effect of prior disambiguating context on the comprehension of ambiguous words: Evidence from eye movements. In D. S. Gorfein (Ed.),, On the consequences of meaning selection-Perspectives on resolving lexical ambiguity(pp. 27-44). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
15. Duffy, S. A., Morris, R. K., & Rayner, K. (1988). Lexical ambiguity and fixation times in reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 27(4), 429-446.
16. Ehrlichman, H., & Barrett, J. (1983). Right hemispheric specialization for mental imagery: A review of the evidence. Brain and Cognition, 2(1), 55-76.
17. Eviatar, Z., Menn, L., & Zaidel, E. (1990). Concreteness: Nouns, verbs, and hemispheres. Cortex, 26(4), 611-624.
18. Fabiani, M., Gratton, G., & Federmeier, K. D. (2007). Event-related brain potentials: Methods, theory, and application. In J. T. Cacioppo, L. Tassinary, & G. Berntson (Eds.),, Handbook of psychophysiology(3rd edn., pp. 85-119). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19. Farah, M. J., Weisberg, L. L., Monheit, M. A., & Peronnet, F. (1989). Brain activity underlying mental imagery: Event-related potentials during mental image generation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 1(4), 302-316.
20. Federmeier, K. D. (2007). Thinking ahead: The role and roots of prediction in language comprehension. Psychophysiology, 44, 491-505.
21. Federmeier, K. D., & Laszlo, S. (2009). Time for meaning: Electrophysiology provides insights into the dynamics of representation and processing in semantic memory. In B. Ross (Ed.),, P sychology of learning and memory(Vol. 51). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
22. Federmeier, K. D., Segal, J. B., Lombrozo, T., & Kutas, M. (2000). Brain responses to nouns, verbs and class-ambiguous words in context. Brain, 123(12), 2552-2566.
23. Francis, W. N., & Kucera, H. (1982). Frequency analysis of English usage: Lexicon and grammar Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
24. Gennari, S. P., MacDonald, M. C., Postle, B. R., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2007). Contextdependent interpretation of words: Evidence for interactive neural processes. NeuroImage, 35(3), 1278-1286.
25. Gentner, D. (1981). Some interesting differences between verbs and nouns. Cognition and Brain Theory, 4, 161-178.
26. Gentner, D. (1982). Why nouns are learned before verbs: Linguistic relativity versus natural partitioning. In S. A. Kuczaj (Ed.),, Language development. Language, thought and culture (Vol. 2, pp. 301-334). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
27. Gerhand, S., & Barry, C. (2000). When does a deep dyslexic make a semantic error? The roles of age-of-acquisition, concreteness, and frequency. Brain and Language, 74(1), 26-47.
28. Gomes, H., Ritter, W., Tartter, V. C., Vaughan, H. G., & Rosen, J. J. (1997). Lexical processing of visually and auditorily presented nouns and verbs: Evidence from reaction time and N400 priming data. Cognitive Brain Research, 6(2), 121-134.
29. Haberlandt, K. F., & Graesser, A. C. (1985). Component processes in text comprehension and some of their interactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 114, 357-375.
30. Hauk, O., Davis, M. H., Ford, M., Pulvermüller, F., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (2006). The time course of visual word recognition as revealed by linear regression analysis of ERP data. Neuroimage, 30(4), 1383-1400.
31. Hogaboam, T. W., & Perfetti, C. A. (1975). Lexical ambiguity and sentence comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14(3), 265-272.
32. Holcomb, P. J., Kounios, J., Anderson, J. E., & West, W. C. (1999). Dual-coding, contextavailability, and concreteness effects in sentence comprehension: An electrophysiological investigation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 25(3), 721-742.
33. Holmes, V. M., & Langford, J. (1976). Comprehension and recall of abstract and concrete sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 15(5), 559-566.
34. Huang, H. W., Lee, C. L., & Federmeier, K. D. (2010). Imagine that! ERPs provide evidence for distinct hemispheric contributions to the processing of concrete and abstract concepts . NeuroImage.
35. Jonkers, R., & Bastiaanse, R. (1998). How selective are selective word class deficits? Two case studies of action and object naming. Aphasiology, 12(3), 245-256.
36. Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review, 87, 329-354.
37. Kemmerer, D., & Tranel, D. (2000). Verb retrieval in brain-damaged subjects: 1. Analysis of stimulus, lexical, and conceptual factors. Brain and Language, 73, 347-392.
38. Khader, P., Scherag, A., Streb, J., & Rösler, F. (2003). Differences between noun and verb processing in a minimal phrase context: A semantic priming study using event-related brain potentials. Cognitive Brain Research, 17(2), 293-313.
39. King, J. W., & Kutas, M. (1995). Who did what and when? Using word-and clause-level ERPs to monitor working memory usage in reading. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 7(376-395).
40. King, J. W., & Kutas, M. (1998). Neural plasticity in the dynamics of human visual word recognition. Neuroscience Letters, 244(2), 61-64.
41. Kosslyn, S. M. (1987). Seeing and imagining in the cerebral hemispheres: A computational approach. Psychological Review, 94(2), 148-175.
42. Kounios, J., & Holcomb, P. J. (1994). Concreteness effects in semantic processing: ERP evidence supporting dual-coding theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20(4), 804-823.
43. Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2000). Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(12), 463-470.
44. Lee, C. L., & Federmeier, K. D. (2006). To mind the mind: An event-related potential study of word class and semantic ambiguity. Brain Research, 1081(1), 191-202.
45. Lee, C. L., & Federmeier, K. D. (2008). To watch, to see, and to differ: An event-related potential study of concreteness effects as a function of word class and lexical ambiguity. Brain and Language, 104(2), 145-158.
46. Lee, C. L., & Federmeier, K. D. (2009). Wave-ering: An ERP study of syntactic and semantic context effects on ambiguity resolution for noun/verb homographs. Journal of Memory and Language.
47. Longe, O., Randall, B., Stamatakis, E. A., & Tyler, L. K. (2007). Grammatical categories in the brain: The role of morphological structure. Cerebral Cortex, 17(8), 1812-1820.
48. Marschark, M. (1985). Imagery and organization in recall of prose. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 734-745.
49. Marshall, J., Pring, T., Chiat, S., & Robson, J. (1996). Calling a salad a federation: An investigation of semantic jargon-Part 1: Nouns. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 9, 237-250.
50. Marslen-Wilson, W., & Tyler, L. K. (1980). The temporal structure of spoken language understanding . Cognition, 8, 1-71.
51. Mason, R. A., & Just, M. A. (2007). Lexical ambiguity in sentence comprehension. Brain Research, 1146, 115-127.
52. McCarthy, R., & Warrington, E. K. (1985). Category specificity in an agrammatic patient: The relative impairment of verb retrieval and comprehension. Neuropsychologia, 23, 709-727.
53. Metzler, C. (2001). Effects of left frontal lesions on the selection of context-appropriate meanings. Neuropsychology, 15(3), 315-328.
54. Miceli, G., Silveri, M. C., Nocentini, U., & Caramazza, A. (1988). Patterns of dissociations in comprehension and production of nouns and verbs. Aphasiology, 2(351-358).
55. Morton, J. (1969). The interaction of information in word recognition. Psychological Review, 76, 165-178.
56. Munte, T. F., Wieringa, B. M., Weyerts, H., Szentkuti, A., Matzke, M., & Johannes, S. (2001). Differences in brain potentials to open and closed class words: Class and frequency effects. Neuropsychologia, 39(1), 91-102.
57. Myerson, R., & Goodglass, H. (1972). Transformational grammars of three agrammatic patients. Language and Speech, 15, 40-50.
58. Norris, D. (1986). Word recognition: Context effects without priming. Cognition(22), 93-136.
59. Osterhout, L., Bersick, M., & McKinnon, R. (1997). Brain potentials elicited by words: Word length and frequency predict the latency of an early negativity. Biological Psychology, 46(2), 143-168.
60. Paivio, A. (1969). Mental imagery in associative learning and memory. Psychological Review, 76, 241-263.
61. Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory: Retrospect and current status. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 45, 255-287.
62. Paivio, A., Clark, J. M., & Khan, M. (1988). Effects of concreteness and semantic relatedness on composite imagery ratings and cued recall. Memory and Cognition, 16(5), 422-430.
63. Paivio, A., Yuille, J. C., & Madigan, S. A. (1968). Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Monograph Supplement, 76(1), 1-25.
64. Paul, S. T., Kellas, G., Martin, M., & Clark, M. B. (1992). Influence of contextual features on the activation of ambiguous word meanings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 18(4), 703-717.
65. Plaut, D. C., & Shallice, T. (1993). Deep dyslexia: A case study of connectionist neuropsychology . Cognitive Neuropsychology, 10, 377-500.
66. Preissl, H., Pulvermüller, F., Lutzenberger, W., & Birbaumer, N. (1995). Evoked potentials distinguish between nouns and verbs. Neuroscience Letters, 197(1), 81-83.
67. Proverbio, A. M., Vecchi, L., & Zani, A. (2004). From orthography to phonetics: ERP measures of grapheme-to-phoneme conversion mechanisms in reading. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16(2), 301-317.
68. Rayner, K., & Frazier, L. (1989). Selection mechanisms in reading lexically ambiguous words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15(5), 779-790.
69. Rayner, K., Pacht, J. M., & Duffy, S. A. (1994). Effects of prior encounter and global discourse bias on the processing of lexically ambiguous words: Evidence from eye fixations. Journal of Memory and Language, 33(4), 527-544.
70. Rayner, K., & Sereno, S. C. (1994). Eye movements in reading: Psycholinguistic studies. In M. Gernsbacher (Ed.),, Handbook of psycholinguistics(pp. 57-81). New York: Academic Press.
71. Reynolds, A., & Flagg, P. (1976). Recognition memory for elements of sentences. Memory and Cognition, 4, 422-432.
72. Robinson, G., Blair, J., & Cipolotti, L. (1998). Dynamic aphasia: An inability to select between competing verbal responses? Brain, 121(1), 77-89.
73. Rodd, J., Gaskell, G., & Marslen-Wilson, W. (2002). Making sense of semantic ambiguity: Semantic competition in lexical access. Journal of Memory and Language, 46(2), 245-266.
74. Rodd, J. M., Davis, M. H., & Johnsrude, I. S. (2005). The neural mechanisms of speech comprehension: fMRI studies of semantic ambiguity. Cerebral Cortex, 15(8), 1261-1269.
75. Rosler, F., Streb, J., & Haan, H. (2001). Event-related brain potentials evoked by verbs and nouns in a primed lexical decision task. Psychophysiology, 38(4), 694-703.
76. Rubenstein, H., Garfield, L., & Millikan, J. (1970). Homographic entries in the internal lexicon. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 9, 487-494.
77. Rugg, M. D. (1990). Event-related brain potentials dissociate repetition effects of high-and low-frequency words. Memory and Cognition, 18(4), 367-379.
78. Rugg, M. D., Allan, K., & Birch, C. S. (2000). Electrophysiological evidence for the modulation of retrieval orientation by depth of study processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12(4), 664-678.
79. Saffran, E. M., Schwartz, M. F., & Marin, S. M. (1980). Evidence from aphasia: Isolating the components of a production model. In B. Butterworth (Ed.),, Language production (Vol. 1, pp. 221-241). London: Academic Press.
80. Schendan, H. E., Ganis, G., & Kutas, M. (1998). Neurophysiological evidence for visual perceptual categorization of words and faces within 150 ms. Psychophysiology, 35, 240-251.
81. Schilling, H. E. H., Rayner, K., & Chumbley, J. I. (1998). Comparing naming, lexical decision, and eye fixation times: Word frequency effects and individual differences. Memory and Cognition, 26(6), 1270-1281.
82. Schwanenflugel, P. (1991). Why are abstract concepts hard to understand? In P. Schwanenflugel (Ed.), The psychology of word meanings(pp. 223-250). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
83. Schwanenflugel, P. J., Harnishfeger, K. K., & Stowe, R. W. (1988). Context availability and lexical decisions for abstract and concrete words. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 499-520.
84. Schwanenflugel, P. J., & Shoben, E. J. (1983). Differential context effects in the comprehension of abstract and concrete verbal materials. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9(1), 82-102.
85. Seidenberg, M. S., Tanenhaus, M. K., Leiman, J. M., & Bienkowski, M. (1982). Automatic access of the meanings of ambiguous words in context: Some limitations of knowledge-based processing. Cognitive Psychology, 14(4), 489-537.
86. Shapiro, L., Zurif, E., & Grimshaw, J. (1987). Sentence processing and the mental representation of verbs. Cognition, 27(3), 219-246.
87. Smith, M. E., & Halgren, E. (1987). Event-related potentials during lexical decision: Effects of repetition, word frequency, pronounceability, and concreteness. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, Supplement, 40, 417-421.
88. Solomon, R. L., & Howes, D. H. (1951). Word frequency, personal values and visual duration thresholds. Psychological Review, 58, 256-270.
89. Swaab, T. Y., Baynes, K., & Knight, R. T. (2002). Separable effects of priming and imageability on word processing: An ERP study. Cognitive Brain Research, 15(1), 99-103.
90. Szekely, A., D'Amico, S., Devescovi, A., Federmeier, K., Herron, D., Iyer, G., et al. (2005). Timed action and object naming. Cortex, 41(1), 7-25.
91. Tanenhaus, M. K., Leiman, J. M., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1979). Evidence for multiple stages in the processing of ambiguous words in syntactic contexts. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 427-440.
92. Taylor, W. L. (1953). " Cloze procedure ": A new tool for measuring readability. Journalism Quarterly, 30, 415-433.
93. Thompson-Schill, S. L., Swick, D., Farah, M. J., D'Esposito, M., Kan, I. P., & Knight, R. T. (1998). Verb generation in patients with focal frontal lesions: A neuropsychological test of neuroimaging findings. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 95(26), 15855-15860.
94. Twilley, L. C., Dixon, P., Taylor, D., & Clark, K. (1994). University of Alberta norms of relative meaning frequency for 566 homographs. Memory and Cognition, 22(1), 111-126.
95. Van Berkum, J. J., Brown, C. M., Hagoort, P., & Zwitserlood, P. (2003). Event-related brain potentials reflect discourse-referential ambiguity in spoken language comprehension. Psychophysiology, 40(2), 235-248.
96. Van Berkum, J. J., Hagoort, P., & Brown, C. M. (1999). Semantic integration in sentences and discourse: Evidence from the N400. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11(6), 657-671.
97. Van Petten, C. (1993). A comparison of lexical and sentence-level context effects in eventrelated potentials. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8(4), 485-531.
98. Van Petten, C., & Kutas, M. (1990). Interactions between sentence context and word frequency in event-related brain potentials. Memory and Cognition, 18(4), 380-393.
99. Van Petten, C., & Kutas, M. (1991). Influences of semantic and syntactic context on open-and closed-class words. Memory and Cognition, 19(1), 95-112.
100. West, W. C., & Holcomb, P. J. (2000). Imaginal, semantic, and surface-level processing of concrete and abstract words: An electrophysiological investigation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12(6), 1024-1037.
101. Williams, S. E., & Canter, G. J. (1987). Action-naming performance in four syndromes of aphasia. B rain and Language, 32(1), 124-136.
102. Wlotko, E. W., & Federmeier, K. D. (2007). Finding the right word: Hemispheric asymmetries in the use of sentence context information. Neuropsychologia, 45(13), 3001-3014.
103. Zempleni, M.-Z., Renken, R., Hoeks, J. C. J., Hoogduin, J. M., & Stowe, L. A. (2007). Semantic ambiguity processing in sentence context: Evidence from event-related fMRI. NeuroImage, 34(3), 1270-1279.