Stakeholder thinking and a pedagogical approach in public relations processes: experience from transition societies

Journal of Public Relations Research

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 71-93

  Tampere, Kaja ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF JYVÄSKYLÄ   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84886330503     PISSN: 1062726X     EISSN: 1532754X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10627260701727028     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Adler, P. A., and Adler, P., 1998. “ Observational techniques ”. In Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials, Edited by: Denzin, N. K., and Lincoln, Y. S., 79–109. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2. Castells, M., 2004. The network society. A cross cultural perspective, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
3. Clandinin, J. D., and Connelly, M. F., 1998. “ Personal experience methods ”. In Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials, Edited by: Denzin, N. K., and Lincoln, Y. S., 150–178. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4. Cutlip, S. M., Center, A. H., and Broom, G. M., 1985. Effective public relations, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
5. Donaldson, T., and Preston, L. E., 1995. The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20: 65–91.
6. Eskelinen, S., 2005. Citizens' attitudes and involvement in public consumer information, Jyväskylä, Finland: Jyväskylä University Publications.
7. Fairclough, N., 1999. Discourse and social change, Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
8. Freeman, R. E., 1984. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach, Boston, MA: Ballinger.
9. Grunig, J., 1989. “ Symmetrical presuppositions as a framework for public relations theory ”. In Public relations theory, Edited by: Botan, C. H., and Hazleton, V., 17–44. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
10. Grunig, J., 2001. “ Two-way symmetrical public relations. Past, present and future ”. In Handbook of public relations, Edited by: Heath, R. L., 11–30. Thousand Oaks, CA: International Educational and Professional Publisher.
11. Grunig, J., and Jaatinen, M., 1999. Strategic, symmetrical public relations in government: From pluralism to societal corporations. Journal of Communication Management, 3: 218–234.
12. Grunig, J. E., and Hunt, T., 1984. Managing public relations, New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
13. Grunig, J. E., and Hunt, T., 1992. Excellence in public relations and communication management, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
14. Habermas, J., 1984. Theory of communicative action, vol. 1, Boston: Beacon Press.
15. Harrison, S., 1995. Public relations. An introduction, London, UK: Routledge.
16. Høyer, S., Lauk, E., and Vihalemm, P., 1993. Towards a civil society. The Baltic media's long road to freedom. Perspectives on history, ethnicity and journalism, Tartu, Estonia: Baltic Association for Media Research.
17. Jawahar, I. M., and McLaughlin, G. L., 2001. Toward a descriptive stakeholder theory: An organizational life cycle approach. Academy of Management Review, 26: 397–414.
18. Key, S., 1999. Toward a new theory of the firm: A critique of stakeholder “theory”. Management Decision, 37: 317–328.
19. Lauristin, M., Vihalemm, P., Rosengren, K. E., and Weibull, L., 1997. Return to the western world. Cultural and political perspectives on the Estonian post-communist transition, Tartu, Estonia: Tartu University Press.
20. Lawniczak, R., 2001. Public relations contribution to transition in Central and Eastern Europe. Research and practice Poznan, Poland
21. Lehtonen, J., 2002. “ Corporate reputation and the stakeholder approach–Overlapping perspectives? ”. In Media and public relations: Issues of education and practice, Edited by: Petev, T., and Zlateva, M., 28–39. Sofia, Bulgaria: Faculty of Journalism and Mass Communication of the Sofia University St. Kliment Ohridski.
22. Lehtonen, J., 2004. “ Beyond civil society: Citizens as decision makers in a customer oriented society ”. In Communication and political change, Edited by: Barthel, H., and Carragee, K. L., 145–162. Ingbert, Germany: St.Röhrig Universitätsverlag.
23. McLuhan, M., and Powers, B. R., 1992. The global village: Transformations in world life and media in the 21st century, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
24. Morris, W., 1973. The American Heritage dictionary of the English language, Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
25. Nordenstreng, K., 2002. “ What was the tasks of the media after all? ”. In Spanning the boundaries of communication, Edited by: Eskelinen, S., Saranen, T., and Tuhkio, T., 89–94. Jyväskylä, Finland: University of Jyväskylä, Department of Communication.
26. Scapel, M., 1999. Konstruktivismist: Lonstruktivistlik õpetamis-ja õppimisteooria [Constructivism: Constructivist teaching and learning theory]. Haridus, 5: 32–33.
27. Sharpe, M. L., 2000. Developing a behavioral paradigm for the performance of public relations. Public Relations Review, 26345–361.
28. Smith, A. 1997. “ Breaking the old and constructing the new: geographies of uneven development in Central and Eastern Europe ”. In Geographies of Economies, Edited by: Lee, R., and Wills, J., 331–345. London: Arnold.
29. Sriramesh, K., and Veri, D., 2000. “ A framework for understanding, and conducting interenational public relations ”. In Public relations, public affairs and corporate communication in new millenium: The future, Edited by: Veri, D., White, J., and Moss, D., 175–184. Ljubljana, Slovenia: Pristop Communication.
30. Sriramesh, K., and White, J., 1992. “ Societal culture and public relations ”. In Excellence in public relations and communication management, Edited by: Grunig, J. E., 597–614. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
31. Stark, D., 1996. Recombinant property in East European capitalism. American Journal of Sociology, 101: 993–1027.
32. Sztompka, P., 1996. Looking back: The year 1989 as a cultural and civilizational break. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 29: 115–129.
33. Sztompka, P., 2002. Cultural trauma: The other face of social change. European Journal of Social Theory, 3: 449–466.
34. Sztompka, P., 2004. The trauma of social change, cultural trauma and collective identity, Berkley: University of California Press.
35. Tampere, K., 2003. Public relations in a transition society 1989–2002. Using a stakeholder approach in organisational communication and relations analyses, Jyväskylä, Finland: University of Jyväskylä Publications.
36. Van Ruler, B. & Veri, D. (2002). The Bled manifesto on public relations. Pristop Communication. Ljubljana, Slovenia. Retrieved August 15, 2005 from http://www.vercic.pristop.si/doc/manifesto.pdf
37. Van Ruler, B. 2004. The communication grid: An introduction of a model of four communication strategies. Public Relations Review, 30: 123–143.
38. Vihalemm, P., and Lauristin, M., 2002. “ Journalism and public relations in different normative contexts ”. In Spanning the boundaries of communication, Edited by: Eskelinen, S., Saranen, T., and Tuhkio, T., 133–142. Jyväskylä, Finland: University of Jyväskylä, Department of Communication.
39. Vos, M., and Schoemaker, H., 1999. Integrated communication: Concern, internal and marketing communication, Utrecht, Netherlands: Lemma.
40. Wood, D., and Jones, R., 1995. Stakeholder mismatching: A theoretical problem in empirical research on corporate social performance. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 3: 225–332.