Dearterialization with mucopexy versus haemorrhoidectomy for grade III or IV haemorrhoids: Short-term results of a double-blind randomized controlled trial

Colorectal Disease

Volumn 15, Issue 10, 2013, Pages 1281-1288

  Denoya, P I ^a   Fakhoury, M ^a   Chang, K ^a   Fakhoury, J ^a   Bergamaschi, R ^a  

^a STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Dearterialization; Haemorrhoids; Mucopexy; Randomized controlled trial

Indexed keywords

HYDROCODONE; NARCOTIC AGENT; OXYCODONE;

ADULT; AGE; AMERICAN SOCIETY OF ANESTHESIOLOGY SCORE; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; BRIEF PAIN INVENTORY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMORBIDITY; CONSTIPATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; COPING BEHAVIOR; DEARTERIALIZATION; DEPRESSION; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; FECAL INCONTINENCE QUALITY OF LIFE SCORE; FEMALE; HEMORRHOID; HEMORRHOIDECTOMY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; MUCOPEXY; OPERATION DURATION; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SCORING SYSTEM; SHORT FORM 12; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URINE RETENTION;

DEARTERIALIZATION; HAEMORRHOIDS; MUCOPEXY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;

ADULT; ANALGESICS, OPIOID; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; FEMALE; HEMORRHOIDECTOMY; HEMORRHOIDS; HUMANS; INTESTINAL MUCOSA; LIGATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN MANAGEMENT; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; QUALITY OF LIFE; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, DOPPLER; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, INTERVENTIONAL;

EID: 84886308914     PISSN: 14628910     EISSN: 14631318     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/codi.12303     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Joshi GP, Neugebauer EAM. Evidence-based management of pain after haemorrhoidectomy surgery. Br J Surg 2010; 97: 1155-68.
2. Sohn N, Aronoff JS, Cohen FS, Weinstein MA. Transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization is an alternative to operative hemorrhoidectomy. Am J Surg 2001; 182: 515-9.
3. Hussain AH. Ligation-anopexy for treatment of advanced hemorrhoidal disease. Dis Colon Rectum 2001; 44: 1887-90.
4. Morinaga K, Hasuda K, Ideda T. A novel therapy for internal hemorrhoids: ligation of the hemorrhoidal artery with a newly devised instrument (Moricorn) in conjunction with a Doppler flow meter. Am J Gastroenterol 1995; 90: 610-3.
5. Felice G, Privitera A, Ellul E, Klaumann M. Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation: an alternative to hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 2005; 48: 2090-3.
6. Greenberg R, Karin E, Avital S, Skornik Y, Werbin N. First 100 cases with Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation. Dis Colon Rectum 2006; 49: 485-9.
7. Scheyer M, Antonietti E, Rollinger G, Mall H, Arnold S. Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal ligation. Am J Surg 2006; 191: 89-93.
8. Dal Monte PP, Tagariello C, Sarago M et al. Transanal haemorrhoidal dearterialisation: nonexcisional surgery for the treatment of haemorrhoidal disease. Tech Coloproctol 2007; 11: 333-8; discussion 338-9.
9. Wallis de Vries BM, van der Beek ES, de Wijkerslooth LR et al. Treatment of grade 2 and 3 hemorrhoids with Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation. Dig Surg 2007; 24: 436-40.
10. Walega P, Scheyer M, Kenig J et al. Two-center experience in the treatment of hemorrhoidal disease using Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation: functional results after 1-year follow-up. Surg Endosc 2008; 22: 2379-83.
11. Faucheron JL, Gangner Y. Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation for the treatment of symptomatic hemorrhoids: early and three-year follow-up results in 100 consecutive patients. Dis Colon Rectum 2008; 51: 945-9.
12. Bursics A, Morvay K, Kupcsulik P, Flautner L. Comparison of early and 1-year follow-up results of conventional hemorrhoidectomy and hemorrhoid artery ligation: a randomized study. Int J Colorectal Dis 2004; 19: 176-80.
13. Aigner F, Bodner G, Conrad F, Mbaka G, Kreczy A, Fritsch H. The superior rectal artery and its branching pattern with regard to its clinical influence on ligation techniques for internal hemorrhoids. Am J Surg 2004; 187: 102-8.
14. Gupta PJ, Kalaskar S, Taori S, Heda PS. Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation does not offer any advantage over suture ligation of grade 3 symptomatic hemorrhoids. Tech Coloproctol 2011; 15: 439-44.
15. Jongen J, Peleikis HG. Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation: an alternative to hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 2006; 49: 1082-3.
16. Keller S, Bann CM, Dodd SL, Schein J, Mendoza RT. Validity of the brief pain inventory for use in documenting the outcomes of patients with noncancer pain. Clin J Pain 2004; 20: 309-18.
17. Tan G, Jensen MP, Thronby JI, Shanti BF. Validation of the brief pain inventory for chronic nonmalignant pain. J Pain 2004; 5: 133-7.
18. Daut RL, Cleeland CS, Flanery RC. Development of the Wisconsin Brief Pain Questionnaire to assess pain in cancer and other diseases. Pain 1983; 17: 197-210.
19. Ware JE. SF-36 Health Survey update. Spine 2000; 25: 3130-9.
20. Rockwood TH, Church JM, Fleshman JW et al. Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale: quality of life instrument for patients with fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 2000; 43: 9-16.
21. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications. A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004; 240: 205-13.
22. Banov L Jr, Knoepp LF Jr, Erdman LH, Alia RT. Management of hemorrhoidal disease. JSC Med Assoc 1985; 81: 398-401.
23. Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman DG. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials. Lancet 2001; 357: 1191-4.
24. Ratto C, Giordano P, Donisi L, Parello A, Litta F, Doglietto GB. Transanal haemorrhoidal dearterialization (THD) for selected fourth-degree haemorrhoids. Tech Coloproctol 2011; 15: 191-7.
25. Ferguson JA, Heaton JR. Closed hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 1959; 2: 176-9.
26. Dripps RD, Lamont A, Eckenhoff JE. The role of anesthesia in surgical mortality. JAMA 1961; 178: 261-6.
27. Prytherch DR, Whiteley MS, Higgins B, Weaver PC, Prout WG, Powell SJ. POSSUM and Portsmouth POSSUM for predicting mortality. Br J Surg 1998; 85: 1217-20.
28. Agachan F, Chen T, Pfeifer J, Reissman P, Wexner SD. A constipation scoring system to simplify evaluation and management of constipated patients. Dis Colon Rectum 1996; 39: 681-5.
29. Senagore AJ, Singer M, Abcarian H et al. A prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter trial comparing stapled hemorrhoidopexy and Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy: perioperative and one-year results. Dis Colon Rectum 2004; 47: 1824-36.
30. Rivadeneira DE, Steele SR, Ternent C, Chalasani S, Buie WD, Rafferty JL, on behalf of the Standards Practice Task Force of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons. Practice parameters for the management of hemorrhoids (revised 2010). Dis Colon Rectum 2011; 54: 1059-64.
31. Schuurman JP, Borel Rinkes IH, Go PM. Hemorrhoidal artery ligation procedure with or without Doppler transducer in grade II and III hemorrhoidal disease: a blinded randomized clinical trial. Ann Surg 2012; 255: 840-5.
32. Giordano P, Nastro P, Davies A, Gravante G. Prospective evaluation of stapled haemorrhoidopexy versus transanal haemorrhoidal dearterialisation for stage II and III haemorrhoids: three-year outcomes. Tech Coloproctol 2011; 15: 67-73.
33. Shanmugam V, Thaha MA, Rabindranath KS, Campbell KL, Steele RJ, Loudon MA. Rubber band ligation versus excisional haemorrhoidectomy for haemorrhoids. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005; (3): CD005034.