Applying additive logistic regression to data derived from sensors monitoring behavioral and physiological characteristics of dairy cows to detect lameness

Journal of Dairy Science

Volumn 96, Issue 11, 2013, Pages 7043-7053

  Kamphuis, C ^a,c   Frank, E ^b   Burke, J K ^a   Verkerk, G A ^a   Jago, J G ^a  

^a DAIRYNZ   (New Zealand)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WAIKATO   (New Zealand)

^c WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Dairy cow; Data mining; Lameness detection; Sensor data

Indexed keywords

BOS;

ALGORITHM; ANIMAL; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; BOVINE; CATTLE DISEASES; DAIRYING; DEVICES; FEMALE; GAIT; LACTATION; LAMENESS, ANIMAL; MILK; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICAL MODEL; TIME;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; CATTLE; CATTLE DISEASES; DAIRYING; FEMALE; GAIT; LACTATION; LAMENESS, ANIMAL; LOGISTIC MODELS; MILK; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84886303295     PISSN: 00220302     EISSN: 15253198     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3168/jds.2013-6993     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Alawneh J.I., Stevenson M.A., Williamson N.B., Lopez-Villalobos N., Otley T. Automatic recording of daily walkover liveweight of dairy cattle at pasture in the first 100 days in milk. J. Dairy Sci 2011, 94:4431-4440. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2010-4002.
2. Bicalho R.C., Cheong S.H., Cramer G., Guard C.L. Association between a visual and an automated locomotion score in lactating Holstein cows. J. Dairy Sci 2007, 90:3294-3300. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2007-0076.
3. Cortes C., Mohri M. Confidence intervals for the area under the ROC curve. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 17 2005, 305-312. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. L.K. Saul, Y. Weiss, L. Bottou (Eds.).
4. Detilleux J., Arendt J., Lomba F., Leroy P. Methods of estimating areas under receiver operating characteristic curves: Illustration with somatic-cell scores in subclinical intramammary infections. Prev. Vet. Med 1999, 41:75-88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-5877(99)00054-9.
5. Edwards J.P., Jago J.G., Lopez-Villalobos N. Large rotary dairies achieve high cow throughput but are not more labour efficient than medium sized rotaries. Anim. Prod. Sci 2013, http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/AN12312.
6. Fabian J. The prevalence of lameness on New Zealand dairy farms: A comparison of farmer perception and mobility scoring. MVS Thesis 2012, Institute of Veterinary, Animal and Biomedical Sciences, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
7. Freund Y., Schapire R.E. Experiments with a new boosting algorithm. Proc. 13th Intl. Conf. Machine Learning 1996, 148-156. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco, CA. L. Saitta (Ed.).
8. Friedman J., Hastie T., Tibshirani R. Additive logistic regression: A statistical view of boosting. Ann. Stat 2000, 28:337-407.
9. Gibbs S.J. Dairy lameness in the South Island. Proc. 4th Australasian Dairy Sci 2010, Symp. Caxton Press, Christchurch, New Zealand, Pages 424-427.
10. Green L.E., Hedges V.J., Schukken Y.H., Blowey R.W., Packington A.J. The impact of clinical lameness on the milk yield of dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci 2002, 85:2250-2256. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(02)74304-X.
11. Hall M., Frank E., Holmes G., Pfahringer B., Reutemann P., Witten I.H. The WEKA data mining software: An update. SIGKDD Explor 2009, 11:10-18.
12. Hanley J.A., McNeil B.J. The meaning and use of the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 1982, 143:29-36.
13. Hockey C.D., Morton J.M., Norman S.T., McGowan M.R. Evaluation of a neck mounted 2-hourly activity meter system for detecting cows about to ovulate in two paddock-based Australian dairy herds. Reprod. Domest. Anim 2010, 45:e107-e117. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2009.01531.x.
14. Hogeveen H., Kamphuis C., Steeneveld W., Mollenhorst H. Sensors and clinical mastitis-The quest for the perfect alert. Sensors (Basel) 2010, 10:7991-8009. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s100907991 .
15. Juarez S.T., Robinson P.H., DePeters E.J., Price E.O. Impact of lameness on behavior and productivity of lactating Holstein cows. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci 2003, 83:1-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(03)00107-2.
16. Kamphuis C., Burke J.K., Jago J.G. Cows becoming clinically lame differ in changes in behaviour and physiology compared to cows that do not become clinically lame. Proc. N.Z. Soc. Anim. Prod 2013, 73:5-10.
17. Kamphuis C., Mollenhorst H., Heesterbeek J.A.P., Hogeveen H. Detection of clinical mastitis with sensor data from automatic milking systems in improved by using decision-tree induction. J. Dairy Sci 2010, 93:3616-3627. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2010-3228.
18. Miekley B., Traulsen I., Krieter J. Principal component analyses for the early detection of mastitis and lameness in dairy cows. J. Dairy Res 2013, 80:335-343. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0022029913000290.
19. Pastell M.E., Kujala M. A probabilistic neural network model for lameness detection. J. Dairy Sci 2007, 90:2283-2292. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2006-267.
20. Quinlan J.R. Induction of decision trees. Mach. Learn 1986, 1:81-106.
21. Roelofs J.B., van Eerdenburg F.J.C.M., Soede N.M., Kemp B. Pedometer readings for estrous detection and as predictor for time of ovulation in dairy cattle. Theriogenology 2005, 64:1690-1703. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2005.04.004.
22. Sherlock R., Hogeveen H., Mein G., Rasmussen M. Performance evaluation of systems for automated monitoring of udder health: Analytical issues and guidelines. Proc. Intl. Conf. Mastitis Control: From Science to Practice 2008, 275-282. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, the Netherlands. T.J.G.M. Lam (Ed.).
23. Sprecher D.J., Hostetler D.E., Kaneene J.B. A lameness scoring system that uses posture and gait to predict dairy cattle reproductive performance. Theriogenology 1997, 47:1179-1187. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(97)00098-8.
24. Swets J.A. Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science 1988, 240:1285-1293.
25. Tranter W.P., Morris R.S. A case study of lameness in three dairy herds. N. Z. Vet. J 1991, 39:88-96.
26. Walker S.L., Smith R.F., Routly J.E., Jones D.N., Morris M.J., Dobson H. Lameness, activity time-budgets, and estrus expression in dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci 2008, 91:4552-4559. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2008-1048.
27. Whay H.R., Main D.C.J., Green L.E., Webster A.J.F. Farmer perception of lameness prevalence. Proc. 12th Int 2002, Symp. Lameness Ruminants, Orlando, FL. International Veterinary Information Service (IVIS), Ithaca, NY, Pages 355-358.
28. Whay H.R., Waterman A.E., Webster A.J.F. Associations between locomotion, claw lesions and nociceptive threshold in dairy heifers during the peri-partum period. Vet. J 1997, 154:155-161.