Principal component analysis for the early detection of mastitis and lameness in dairy cows

Journal of Dairy Research

Volumn 80, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 335-343

  Miekley, Bettina ^a   Traulsen, Imke ^a   Krieter, Joachim ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KIEL   (Germany)

Author keywords

lameness detection; Mastitis detection; multivariate control charts; principal component analysis

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ANIMAL LAMENESS; ARTICLE; BOVINE MASTITIS; CATTLE; CATTLE DISEASE; FEMALE; METHODOLOGY; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ANIMALS; CATTLE; CATTLE DISEASES; FEMALE; LAMENESS, ANIMAL; MASTITIS, BOVINE; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84880786455     PISSN: 00220299     EISSN: 14697629     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0022029913000290     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Abdi H & Williams LJ 2010 Principal component analysis. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics 2 433-459
2. Bareille N, Beaudeau F, Billon S, Robert A & Faverdin P 2003 Effects of health disorders on feed intake and milk production in dairy cows. Livestock Production Science 83 53-62
3. Brandt M, Haeussermann A & Hartung E 2010 Invited review: technical solutions for analysis of milk constituents and abnormal milk. Journal of Dairy Science 93 427-436
4. Burstyn I 2004 Principal component analysis is a powerful Instrument in occupational hygiene inquiries. Annals of Occupational Hygiene 48 655-661
5. Cavero D, Tölle KH, RaveG, Buxadé C & Krieter J 2007 Analysing serial data for mastitis detection by means of local regression. Livestock Science 110 101-110
6. Cavero D, Tölle KH, Henze C, Buxadé C & Krieter J 2008 Mastitis detection in dairy cows by application of Neural Networks. Livestock Science 114 280-286
7. Chagunda MGG, Friggens NC, RasmussenMD& Larsen T 2006 A model for detection of individual cow mastitis based on an indicator measured in milk. Journal of Dairy Science 89 2980-2998
8. Choi SW, Lee C, Lee J-M, Park JH & Lee I-B 2005 Fault detection and identification of nonlinear processes based on kernel PCA. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 75 55-67
9. de Mol RM & Woldt WE 2001 Application of fuzzy logic in automated cow status monitoring. Journal of Dairy Science 84 400-410
10. de Mol RM, Kroeze GH, Achten JMFH, Maatje K & RossingW1997 Results of a multivariate approach to automated oestrus and mastitis detection. Livestock Production Science 48 219-227
11. de Mol RM, Keen A, Kroeze GH & Achten JMFH 1999 Description of a detection model for oestrus and diseases in dairy cattle based on time series analysis combined with a Kalman filter. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 22 171-185
12. Dohoo I 2001 Setting SCC cutpoints for cow and herd interpretation. In National Mastitis Council 2001-Annual Meeting Proceedings: Somatic Cell Count Symposium (Ed. Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, F.a.R.A., Fergus, Ontario, Canada), Ferguson, Canada
13. Gonzalez LA, Tolkamp BJ, Coffey MP, Ferret A & Kyriazakis I 2008 Changes in feeding behavior as possible indicators for the automatic monitoring of health disorders in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 91 1017-1028
14. Hogeveen H, Kamphuis C, Steeneveld W & Mollenhorst H 2010 Sensors and clinical mastitis-the quest for the perfect alert. Sensors 10 7991-8009
15. Hojsgaard S & Friggens NC 2010 Quantifying degree of mastitis from common trends in a panel of indicators for mastitis in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 93 582-592
16. ISO 2007 Automatic milking systems-requirements and testing. Annex C: Example of methods of evaluating detection systems for milk deemed as abnormal due to blood or to changes in homogeneity. ISO 20966:2007, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.
17. Kamphuis C, Mollenhorst H, Feelders A, Pietersma D & Hogeveen H 2010 Decision-tree induction to detect clinical mastitis with automatic milking. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 70 60-68
18. Kourti T 2002 Process analysis and abnormal situation detection: from theory to practice. Control Systems Magazine, IEEE 22 10-25
19. Kourti T 2006 The Process Analytical Technology initiative and multivariate process analysis, monitoring and control. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry 384 1043-1048
20. Kourti T & MacGregor JF 1995 Process analysis, monitoring and diagnosis, using multivariate projection methods. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 28 3-21
21. Kourti T, Brown SD, Tauler R, Walczak B 2009 4.02-Multivariate statistical process control and process control, using latent variables. In SD Brown, R Tauler & B Walczak, Comprehensive Chemometrics, pp. 21-54. Oxford: Elsevier
22. Kramer E, Cavero D, Stamer E & Krieter J 2009 Mastitis and lameness detection in dairy cows by application of Fuzzy Logic. Livestock Science 125 92-96
23. Lukas JM, Reneau JK & Linn JG 2008 Water intake and dry matter intake changes as a feeding management tool and indicator of health and estrus status in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 91 3385-3394
24. Lukas JM, Reneau JK, Wallace R, HawkinsD& Munoz-Zanzi C 2009 A novel method of analyzing daily milk production and electrical conductivity to predict disease onset. Journal of Dairy Science 92 5964-5976
25. MacGregor JF & Kourti T 1995 Statistical process control of multivariate processes. Control Engineering Practice 3 403-414
26. MacGregor JF, Yu H, García Muñoz S & Flores-Cerrillo J 2005 Data-based latent variable methods for process analysis, monitoring and control. Computers and Chemical Engineering 29 1217-1223 Matlab 2010 MathWorks, Release Notes for use with MATLAB 7.10.0
27. Miekley B, Traulsen I & Krieter J 2012 Detection of mastitis and lameness in dairy cows using wavelet analysis. Journal of Livestock Science 148 227-236
28. Milner P, Page KL & Hillerton JE 1997 The effects of early antibiotic treatment following diagnosis of mastitis detected by a change in the electrical conductivity of milk. Journal of Dairy Science 80 859-863
29. Mollenhorst H, van der Tol PPJ & Hogeveen H 2010 Somatic cell count assessment at the quarter or cow milking level. Journal of Dairy Science 93 3358-3364
30. Montgomery DC 2009 Statistical Quality Control: A Modern Introduction. Arizona: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
31. Nielen M, Schukken YH, Brand A, Haring S & Ferwerda-Van Zonneveld RT 1995 Comparison of analysis techniques for on-line detection of clinical mastitis. Journal of Dairy Science 78 1050-1061
32. Pastell ME & Kujala M 2007 A probabilistic neural network model for lameness detection. Journal of Dairy Science 90 2283-2292
33. Petersen HH, Gardner IA, Rossitto P, Larsen HD & Heegard PMH 2005 Milk amyloid A (MAA) concentration and somatic cell count (SCC) in the diagnosis of bovine mastitis. In Mastitis in Dairy Production: Current Knowledge and Future Solutions. Wageningen, The Netherlands: Wageningen Academic Publishers 473-476
34. Pyörälä S 2003 Indicators of inflammation in the diagnosis of mastitis. Veterinary Research 34 565-578
35. Sloth KHMN, Friggens NC, Lovendahl P, Andersen PH, Jensen J & Ingvartsen KL 2003 Potential for improving description of bovine udder health status by combined analysis of milk parameters. J. Dairy Sci 86 1221-1232
36. Venkatasubramanian V, Rengaswamy R & Kavuri SN 2003 A review of process fault detection and diagnosis: Part II: qualitative models and search strategies. Computers and Chemical Engineering 27 313-326
37. Windig JJ, Calus MPL, de Jong G & Veerkamp RF 2005 The association between somatic cell count patterns and milk production prior to mastitis. Livestock Production Science 96 291-299
38. Zhang Y-W, Zhou H & Qin SJ 2010 Decentralized fault diagnosis of largescale processes using multiblock kernel principal component analysis. Acta Automatica Sinica 36 593-597