Simplified synthesis route for interfacially polymerized polyamide membranes

Journal of Membrane Science

Volumn 451, Issue , 2014, Pages 148-156

  Hermans, Sanne ^a   Mariën, Hanne ^a   Dom, Elke ^a   Bernstein, Roy ^a   Vankelecom, Ivo F J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Aromatic polyamide; Interfacial polymerization; Membrane synthesis; Nanofiltration; Thin film composite

Indexed keywords

AROMATIC POLYAMIDES; INTERFACIAL POLYMERIZATION; MEMBRANE PERFORMANCE; MEMBRANE SYNTHESIS; SYNTHESIS CONDITIONS; SYNTHESIS PARAMETERS; THIN FILM COMPOSITES; THIN-FILM COMPOSITE MEMBRANE;

CHLORINE COMPOUNDS; IMPREGNATION; NANOFILTRATION; POLYMER FILMS; POLYMERIZATION; SODIUM DODECYL SULFATE;

MONOMERS;

1,3 PHENYLENEDIAMINE; AMINE; BASE; CHLORIDE; DODECYL SULFATE SODIUM; MONOMER; POLYAMIDE; POLYSULFONE; SURFACTANT; TRIETHYLAMINE;

ACYLATION; ARTICLE; CATALYST; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); FILM; MEMBRANE; POLYMERIZATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SYNTHESIS; THIN FILM COMPOSITE MEMBRANE;

EID: 84886259684     PISSN: 03767388     EISSN: 18733123     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2013.10.005     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Petersen R.J. Composite reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes. Journal of Membrane Science 1993, 83:81-150.
2. Lau W.J., Ismail A.F., Misdan N., Kassim M.A. A recent progress in thin film composite membrane: a review. Desalination 2012, 287:190-199.
3. Lee K.P., Arnot T.C., Mattia D. A review of reverse osmosis membrane materials for desalination - development to date and future potential. Journal of Membrane Science 2011, 370:1-22.
4. Ghosh A.K., Jeong B.-H., Huang X., Hoek E.M.V. Impacts of reaction and curing conditions on polyamide composite reverse osmosis membrane properties. Journal of Membrane Science 2008, 311:34-45.
5. Prakash Rao A., Desai N.V., Rangarajan R. Interfacially synthesized thin film composite RO membranes for seawater desalination. Journal of Membrane Science 1997, 124:263-272.
6. Prakash Rao A., Joshi S.V., Trivedi J.J., Devmurari C.V., Shah V.J. Structure-performance correlation of polyamide thin film composite membranes: effect of coating conditions on film formation. Journal of Membrane Science 2003, 211:13-24.
7. Ramon G.Z., Wong M.C.Y., Hoek E.M.V. Transport through composite membrane, part 1: Is there an optimal support membrane?. Journal of Membrane Science 2012, 415-416:298-305.
8. Singh P.S., Joshi S.V., Trivedi J.J., Devmurari C.V., Rao A.P., Ghosh P.K. Probing the structural variations of thin film composite RO membranes obtained by coating polyamide over polysulfone membranes of different pore dimensions. Journal of Membrane Science 2006, 278:19-25.
9. Chai G.-Y., Krantz W.B. Formation and characterization of polyamide membranes via interfacial polymerization. Journal of Membrane Science 1994, 93:175-192.
10. Kwak S.-Y., Jung S.G., Kim S.H. Structure-motion-performance relationship of flux-enhanced reverse osmosis (RO) membranes composed of aromatic polyamide thin films. Environmental Science and Technology 2001, 35:4334-4340.
11. Tarboush B.J.A., Rana D., Matsuura T., Arafat H.A., Narbaitz R.M. Preparation of thin-film-composite polyamide membranes for desalination using novel hydrophilic surface modifying macromolecules. Journal of Membrane Science 2008, 325:166-175.
12. Ramon G.Z., Hoek E.M.V. Transport through composite membranes, Part 2: impacts of roughness on permeability and fouling. Journal of Membrane Science 2013, 425-426:141-148.
13. Vrijenhoek E.M., Hong S., Elimelech M. Influence of membrane surface properties on initial rate of colloidal fouling of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes. Journal of Membrane Science 2001, 188:115-128.
14. J.E. Tomaschke, Interfacially synthesized reverse osmosis membrane containing an amine salt and processes for preparing the same, US Patent 4,872,984, 1989.
15. Saha N.K., Joshi S.V. Performance evaluation of thin film composite polyamide nanofiltration membrane with variation in monomer type. Journal of Membrane Science 2009, 342:60-69.
16. Tang C.Y., Kwon Y.-N., Leckie J.O. Probing the nano- and micro-scales of reverse osmosis membranes - a comprehensive characterization of physiochemical properties of uncoated and coated membranes by XPS, TEM, ATR-FTIR, and streaming potential measurements. Journal of Membrane Science 2007, 287:146-156.
17. Tang C.Y., Kwon Y.-N., Leckie J.O. Effect of membrane chemistry and coating layer on physiochemical properties of thin film composite polyamide RO and NF membranes: I. FTIR and XPS characterization of polyamide and coating layer chemistry. Desalination 2009, 242:149-167.
18. S.A. Sundet, Production of composite membranes, US Patent 4,520,044, 1985.
19. Vandezande P., Gevers L.E.M., Paul J.S., Vankelecom I.F.J., Jacobs P.A. High throughput screening for rapid development of membranes and membrane processes. Journal of Membrane Science 2005, 250:305-310.
20. Cano-Odena A., Spilliers M., Dedroog T., De Grave K., Ramon J., Vankelecom I.F.J. Optimization of cellulose acetate nanofiltration membranes for micropollutant removal via genetic algorithms and high throughput experimentation. Journal of Membrane Science 2011, 366:25-32.
21. High throughput membrane systems, Leuven, (2013). http://www.html-membrane.be.
22. Hermans S., Bernstein R., Volodin A., Vankelecom I.F.J. Systematic study of synthesis parameters and active layer morphology of interfacially polymerized polyamide-polysulfone membranes, and their effect on performance. Submitted to Desalination 2013.
23. Holda A.K., Aernouts B., Saeys W., Vankelecom I.F.J. Study of polymer concentration and evaporation time as phase inversion parameters for polysulfone-based SRNF membranes. Journal of Membrane Science 2013, 442:196-205.
24. Boom R.M., Wienk I.M., van den Boomgaard, T., Smolders C.A. Microstructures in phase inversion membranes. Part 2: the role of a polymeric additive. Journal of Membrane Science 1992, 73:277-292.
25. Aerts P., Van Hoof E., Leysen R., Vankelecom I.F.J., Jacobs P.A. Polysulfone-aerosil composite membranes: Part 1: the influence of the addition of aerosil on the formation process and membrane morphology. Journal of Membrane Science 2000, 176:63-73.
26. Chakrabarty B., Ghoshal A.K., Purkait M.K. Effect of molecular weight of PEG on membrane morphology and transport properties. Journal of Membrane Science 2008, 309:209-221.
27. Kim J.-H., Lee K.-H. Effect of PEG additive on membrane formation by phase inversion. Journal of Membrane Science 1998, 138:153-163.
28. Han M.-J., Nam S.-T. Thermodynamic and rheological variation in polysulfone solution by PVP and its effect in the preparation of phase inversion membrane. Journal of Membrane Science 2002, 202:55-61.
29. 2 absorption. Journal of Membrane Science 2010, 348:260-267.
30. Guillen G.R., Pan Y., Li M., Hoek E.M.V. Preparation and characterization of membranes formed by nonsolvent induced phase separation: a review. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 2011, 50:3798-3817.
31. Ghosh A.K., Hoek E.M.V. Impacts of support membrane structure and chemistry on polyamide-polysulfone interfacial composite membranes. Journal of Membrane Science 2009, 336:140-148.
32. Bernstein R., Belfer S., Freger V. Surface modification of dense membranes using radical graft polymerization enhanced by monomer filtration. Langmuir 2010, 26:12358-12365.
33. Bernstein R., Belfer S., Freger V. Bacterial attachment to RO membranes surface-modified by concentration-polarization-enhanced graft polymerization. Environmental Science and Technology 2011, 45:5973-5980.
34. Pacheco F.A., Pinnau I., Reinhard M., Leckie J.O. Characterization of isolated polyamide thin films of RO and NF membranes using novel TEM techniques. Journal of Membrane Science 2010, 358:51-59.
35. Freger V. Kinetics of film formation by interfacial polycondensation. Langmuir 2005, 21:1884-1894.
36. Matthews T.D., Yan H., Cahill D.G., Coronell O., Mariñas B.J. Growth dynamics of interfacially polymerized polyamide layers by diffuse reflectance spectroscopy and Rutherford backscattering spectrometry. Journal of Membrane Science 2013, 429:71-80.
37. Xie W., Geise G.M., Freeman B.D., Lee H.-S., Byun G., McGrath J.E. Polyamide interfacial composite membranes prepared from m-phenylene diamine, trimesoyl chloride and a new disulfonated diamine. Journal of Membrane Science 2012, 403-404:152-161.
38. Freger V. Nanoscale heterogeneity of polyamide membranes formed by interfacial polymerization. Langmuir 2003, 19:4791-4797.
39. Freger V., Srebnik S. Mathematical model of charge and density distributions in interfacial polymerization of thin films. Journal of Applied Polymer Science 2003, 88:1162-1169.
40. J.E. Cadotte, Interfacially synthesized reverse osmosis membrane, US Patent 4,277,344, 1981.
41. Klaysom C., Hermans S., Gahlaut A., Van Craenenbroeck S., Vankelecom I.F.J. Polyamide/Polyacrylonitrile (PA/PAN) thin film composite osmosis membranes: film optimization, characterization and performance evaluation. Journal of Membrane Science 2013, 445:25-33.
42. Dalwani M., Benes N.E., Bargeman G., Stamatialis D., Wessling M. Effect of pH on the performance of polyamide/polyacrylonitrile based thin film composite membranes. Journal of Membrane Science 2011, 372:228-238.
43. Rosen M.J. Surfactants and Interfacial Phenomena 1989, John Wiley & Sons, New York. 2nd ed.
44. Veríssimo S., Peinemann K.V., Bordado J. Influence of the diamine structure on the nanofiltration performance, surface morphology and surface charge of the composite polyamide membranes. Journal of Membrane Science 2006, 279:266-275.
45. Kim C.K., Kim J.H., Roh I.J., Kim J.J. The changes of membrane performance with polyamide molecular structure in the reverse osmosis process. Journal of Membrane Science 2000, 165:189-199.
46. Roh I.J., Park S.Y., Kim J.J., Kim C.K. Effects of the polyamide molecular structure on the performance of reverse osmosis membranes. Journal of Polymer Science Part B: Polymer Physics 1998, 36:1821-1830.
47. Jegal J., Min S.G., Lee K.-H. Factors affecting the interfacial polymerization of polyamide active layers for the formation of polyamide composite membranes. Journal of Applied Polymer Science 2002, 86:2781-2787.