Broad analysis of French priority catchment areas: A step toward adaption of the Water Framework Directive?

Land Use Policy

Volumn 36, Issue , 2014, Pages 427-440

  Barataud, Fabienne ^a   Durpoix, Amandine ^a   Mignolet, Catherine ^a  

^a UR 055 INRA SAD ASTER   (France)

Author keywords

Catchment area; Data analysis; Governance; Typology; Water management

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL FRAMEWORK; CATCHMENT; EUROPEAN UNION; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; WATER MANAGEMENT;

FRANCE;

EID: 84886245519     PISSN: 02648377     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.09.010     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Bouleau G., Richard S. Les lois sur l'eau à la lumière de la Directive Cadre. Evolution récente de la réglementation française de l'eau. Europeanizing French Rivers: How the EU Changes National Water Laws 2009, 114. AgroParisTech.
2. Bryan B.A., Kandulu J.M. Designing a policy mix and sequence for mitigating agricultural non-point source pollution in a water supply catchment. Water Resources Management 2011, 25:875-892.
3. Coelho A.C., Labadie J.W., Fontane D.G. Multicriteria decision support system for regionalization of integrated water resources management. Water Resources Management 2011, 26(5):1325-1346.
4. Collins A.L., McGonigle D.F. Monitoring and modelling diffuse pollution from agriculture for policy support: UK and European experience. Environmental Science & Policy 2008, 11:97-101.
5. Cour des Comptes, Rapport public annuel, février 2010, les instruments de la gestion durable de l'eau: http://www.ladocumentationfrancaise.fr/rapports-publics/104000071/index.shtml.
6. De Loë R.C., Di Giantomasso S.E., Kreutzwiser R.D. Local capacity for groundwater protection in Ontario. Environmental Management 2002, 29(2):217-233.
7. Deverre C. Les nouveaux liens sociaux au territoire. Natures Sciences Sociétés 2004, 12:172-178.
8. Dowd B.M., Press D., Los Huertos M. Agricultural nonpoint source water pollution policy: the case of California's Central Coast. Agriculture. Ecosystems and Environment 2008, 128:151-161.
9. Drinkwater L.E., Wagoner P., Sarrantonio M. Legume-based cropping systems have reduced carbon and nitrogen losses. Nature 1998, vol. 396:262-265.
10. Dworak T., Gonzalez C., Laaser C., Interwies E. The need for new monitoring tools to implement the WFD. Environmental Science & Policy 2005, 8:301-306.
11. European Commission Implementation of Council Directive 91/676/EEC Concerning the Protection of Water Against Pollution Caused by Nitrates from Agricultural Sources. Synthesis from Year 2000 Member States Reports 2002, European Commission, Brussels, COM (2002) 407 final.
12. European Commission Report from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on Implementation of Council Directive 91/676/EEC Concerning the Protection of Waters Against Pollution Caused by Nitrates from Agricultural Sources Based on Member State Reports for the Period 2004-2007 2010, European Commission, Brussels, SEC(2010)118/*COM/2010/0047final*/.
13. Even S., Billen G., Bacq N. New tools for modelling water quality of hydrosystems: an application in the Seine River basin in the frame of the Water Framework Directive. Science of the Total Environment 2007, 375(1-3):274-291.
14. Guillain R., Le Gallo J. Agglomeration and dispersion of economic activities in and around Paris: an exploratory spatial data analysis. Environment and planning B: Planning and Design 2010, 37(6):961-981.
15. Haas G., Berg M., Köpke U. Nitrate leaching: comparing conventional, integrated and organic agricultural production systems, Agricultural effects on ground and surface waters: research at the edge of science and society. Proceedings of a symposium held at Wageningen 2002, 131-136.
16. Halberg N., Steen Kristensen E., Sillebak I. Nitrogen turnover on organic and conventional mixed farms. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 1995, 8(1):30-51.
17. Hammer M., Balfors B., Mörtberg U., Petersson M., Quin A. Governance of water resources in the phase of change: a case study of the implementation of the EU Water Framework Directive in Sweden. AMBIO 2011, 40:210-220.
18. Hiscock K., Lovett A., Saich A., Dockerty T., Johnson P., Sandhu C., Sünnenberg G., Appleton K., Harris B., Greaves J. Modelling land use scenario to reduce groundwater nitrate pollution - the European water 4all project. Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology 2007, 40:417-434.
19. Honisch M., Hellmeier C., Weiss K. Response of surface and subsurface water quality to land use changes. Geoderma 2002, 105:277-298.
20. IFEN L'état des eaux souterraines en France: aspects quantitatifs et qualitatifs. Etudes et Travaux 2004, 43. 38p.
21. Ilbery B., Maye D. Clustering and the spatial distribution of organic farming in England and Wales. AREA Royal Geographic Society 2011, 43(1):31-41.
22. Jakeman A.J., Letcher R.A. Integrated assessment and modeling: features, principles and examples for catchment management. Environmental Modelling & Software 2003, 18:491-501.
23. Kunkel R., Kreins P., Tetzlaff B., Wendland F. Forecasting the effects of EU policy measures on the nitrate pollution of groundwater and surface waters. Journal of Environmental Sciences 2010, 22(6):872-877.
24. Lam Q.D., Schmalz B., Fohrer N. The impact of agricultural best management practices on water quality in a North German lowland catchment. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 2011, 183:351-379.
25. Lardon S., Moonen A.C., Marraccini E., Debolini M., Galli M., Loudiyi S. The territory agronomy approach in research, education and training. Farming Systems Research into the 21st Century: The New Dynamic 2012, 257-280. Springer, Dordrecht. I. Darnhofer, D. Gibbon, B. Dedieu (Eds.).
26. Le Gal P.-Y., Merot A., Moulin C.-H., Navarette M., Wery J. A modelling framework to support farmers in designing agricultural production systems. Environmental Modelling & Software 2010, 25:258-268.
27. Lerner D.N., Harris B. The relationship between land use and groundwater resources and quality. Land Use Policy 2009, 26:265-273.
28. Liefferink D., Wiering M., Uitenboogaart Y. The EU Water Framework Directive: a multi-dimensional analysis of implementation and domestic impact. Land Use Policy 2011, 28:712-722.
29. Lital A., Pachel K., Deelstra J. Monitoring of diffuse pollution from agriculture to support implementation of the WFD and the nitrate directive in Estonia. Environmental Science & Policy 2008, 11:185-193.
30. Loi n̊ 2006-1772 du 30 décembre 2006 sur l'eau et les milieux aquatiques (JORF n̊303 du 31 décembre 2006 page 20285).
31. Madignier M.-L., Juffé M., Femenias A. Appropriation des enjeux et mise en oeuvre de la directive cadre sur l'eau (DCE) dans le secteur agricole. Enseignements à partir de six études de cas 2011, 65. Ministère de l'agriculture, de l'alimentation, de la pêche et de l'aménagement du territoire et ministère de l'écologie, du développement durable, des transports et du logement.
32. Meadowcroft J. Politics and scale: some implications for environmental governance. Landscape and Urban Planning 2002, 61:169-179.
33. Mihaiescu T., Mihaiescu R., Odagiu A. Difficulties in the nitrates directive implementation in Romania. ProEnvironment/ProMediu 2010, 3(6):424-428. 608-612.
34. Moss T. Institutional drivers and constraints of floodplain restoration in Europe. International Journal River Basin Management 2007, 5(2):121-130.
35. Nilsson S. Managing Water According to River Basin. Information Management, Institutional Arrangements and Strategic Policy Support - with Focus on the EU Water Framework Directive 2006, TRITA-LWR, (PhD thesis 1030).
36. Pahl-Wostl C. The implications of complexity for integrated resources management. Environmental Modelling & Software 2007, 22:561-569.
37. Petit C. Transitions des exploitations agricoles vers l'agriculture biologique dans un territoire: approche par les interactions entre systèmes technique et de commercialisation. Application aux aires d'alimentation de captages en Ile-de-France 2013, 412. AgroParisTech, Paris, France, Thesis.
38. Posen P., Hutchins M., Lovett A., Davies H. Identifying the catchment size at which robust estimations of agricultural land use can be made, and implications for diffuse pollution modelling. Applied Geography 2011, 31(3):919-929.
39. Prager K., Freese J. Stakeholder involvement in agri-environmental policy making - learning from a local - and a state-level approach in Germany. Journal of Environmental Management 2009, 90:1154-1167.
40. Quevauviller P., Balabanis P., Fragakis C., Weydert M., Oliver M., Kaschl A., Arnold G., Kroll A., Galbiati L., Jo Zaldivar J.M., Bidoglio G. Science-policy integration needs in support of the implementation of the EU Water Framework Directive. Environmental Science & Policy 2005, 8:203-211.
41. Raadgever G.T., Dieperink C., Driessen P.P.J., Smit A.A.H., van Rijswick H.F.M.W. Uncertainty management strategies: lessons from the regional implementation of the Water Framework Directive in the Netherlands. Environmental Science and Policy 2011, 14:64-75.
42. Reed M.S. Stakeholder participation for environmental management: a literature review. Biological Conservation 2008, 141:2417-2431.
43. Schültken H. Strategies for reducing nitrate inputs in groundwater and methods of efficiency control - the lower Saxony co-operation model for groundwater protection and requirements of the EU Nitrates Directive. Results of the MonNO3 Workshop Monitoring Effectiveness of the EU Nitrates Directive Action Programes 2003.
44. Silgram M., Williams A., Waring R., Neumann I., Hughes A., Mansour M., Besien T. Effectiveness of the Nitrate Sensitive Areas Scheme in reducing groundwater concentrations in England. Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrology 2005, 38:117-127.
45. Sohier C., Degre A. Modelling the effects of the current policy measures in agriculture: an unique model from field to regional scale in Walloon region of Belgium. Environmental Science & Policy 2010, 13(8):754-765.
46. Stopes C., Lord E.I., Philipps L., Woodward L. Nitrate leaching from organic farms and conventional farms following best practice, Soil Use and Management, Volume 18. Issue Supplement s1 2002, 256-263.
47. Sylvestre B., Rodriguez M.J. Protection strategies for drinking groundwater sources in small Quebec municipalities. Journal of Environmental Management 2008, 88:28-42.
48. Thieu V., Billen G., Garnier J., Benoit M. Nitrogen cycling in a hypothetical scenario of generalized organic agriculture in the Seine, Somme and Scheldt watersheds. Regional Environmental Change 2010, 1-12.
49. Tippett J., Searle B., Pahl-Wostl C., Rees Y. Social learning in public participation in river basin management - early findings from HarmoniCOP European case studies. Environmental Science & Policy 2005, 8:287-299.
50. Tufféry S. Data mining et statistique décisionnelle (nouvelle édition - revue et augmentée) 2010, Technip, France.
51. Voinov A., Bousquet F. Modelling with stakeholders. Environmental Modelling & Software 2010, 25:1268-1281.
52. Vreudenhil H., Slinger J., Kater E. The influence of scale preferences on the design of a water innovation: a case study in Dutch River Management. Environmental Management 2010, 46:29-43.
53. Wiek A., Larson K.L. Water, people and sustainability - a systems framework for analyzing and assessing water governance regimes. Water Resources Management 2012, 26(11):3153-3171.
54. William H. Diffuse water pollution and diffuse environmental laws. Journal of Environmental Law 2011, 23(1):129-141.
55. Young O. The Institutional Dimensions of Environmental Change: Fit, Interplay and Scale 2002, MIT Press, Cambridge.