Imaging informatics for consumer health: Towards a radiology patient portal

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Volumn 20, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 1028-1036

  Arnold, Corey W ^a   McNamara, Mary ^a   El Saden, Suzie ^b   Chen, Shawn ^a   Taira, Ricky K ^a   Bui, Alex A T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BRAIN CANCER; CONSUMER HEALTH INFORMATION; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DISEASE COURSE; GLIOMA; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGING; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MENINGIOMA; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING; PATIENT EDUCATION;

COMPUTER ASSISTED IMAGE PROCESSING; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING; PATIENT EDUCATION; RADIOLOGY;

BRAIN NEOPLASMS; HUMANS; INTERNET; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING; PATIENT ACCESS TO RECORDS; PATIENT EDUCATION AS TOPIC; RADIOLOGY INFORMATION SYSTEMS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84886236145     PISSN: 10675027     EISSN: 1527974X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001457     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Pew Internet and American Life Project. The Social Life of Health Information. 2009.
2. Bass S, Ruzek S, Gordon TF, et al. The relationship of internet health information use with patient behavior and self efficacy: experiences of newly diagnosed cancer patients who contact the National Cancer Institute's Cancer Information Service. J Health Commun 2006;11:219-36.
3. Castleton K, Fong T, Wang-Gillam A, et al. A survey of internet utilization among patients with cancer. Support Care Cancer 2011;19:1183-90.
4. Metz JM, Devine P, DeNittis A, et al. A multi-institutional study of internet utilization by radiation oncology patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Physiol 2003;56:1201-5.
5. Meric F, Bernstam EV, Mirza NQ, et al. Breast cancer on the world wide web: cross sectional survey of quality of information and popularity of websites. BMJ 2002;324:577.
6. National Cancer Institute. Cancer Communication Health Information National Trends Survey 2003 and 2005. 2007; NIH Publication No. 07-6214.
7. Schwartz KL, Roe T, Northrup J, et al. Family medicine patients' use of the internet for health information: a MetroNet Study. J Am Board Fam Med 2006;19:39-45.
8. Luker KA, Beaver K, Leinster SJ, et al. The information needs of women newly diagnosed with breast cancer. J Adv Nurs 1995;22:134-41.
9. Cawley M, Kostic J, Cappello C. Informational and psychosocial needs of women choosing conservative surgery/primary radiation for early stage breast cancer. Cancer Nurs 1990;13:90-4.
10. Gravis G, Protiere C, Eisinger F, et al. Full access to medical records does not modify anxiety in cancer patients: results of a randomized study. Cancer 2011;117:4796-804.
11. Keselman A, Slaughter L, Arnott-Smith C, et al. editors. Towards consumer-friendly PHRs: patients' experience with reviewing their health records. American Medical Informatics Association (AMIA) Annual Symposium Proceedings 2007. 2007;399-403.
12. Weingart SN, Rind D, Tofias Z, et al. Who uses the patient internet portal? The PatientSite experience. J Am Med Assoc 2006;13:91-5.
13. Soergel D, Tse T, Slaughter L. Helping healthcare consumers understand: an 'interpretive layer' for finding and making sense of medical information. Int Med Inform Assoc Medinfo Proc 2004;11(Pt 2):931-5.
14. Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology. Electronic health records and meaningful use. 2012. http://healthit.hhs.gov/portal/server.pt? open=512&objID=2996&mode=2
15. IOM (Institute of Medicine). Best care at lower cost: the path to continuously learning health care in America. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2012.
16. Koch-Weser S, Bradshaw YS, Gualtieri L, et al. The internet as a health information source: findings from the 2007 Health Information National Trends Survey and implications for health communication. J Health Commun 2010;15:279-93.
17. Kemper D, Del Fiol G, Hall L, et al. Getting patients to meaningful use: using the HL7 infobutton standard for information prescriptions. Healthwise, 2010.
18. Fiol GD, Huser V, Strasberg HR, et al. Implementations of the HL7 context-aware knowledge retrieval ("Infobutton") standard: challenges, strengths, limitations, and uptake. J Biomed Inform 2012;45:726-35.
19. Ma W, Dennis S, Lanka S, et al. MedlinePlus connect: linking health IT systems to consumer health information. IT Professional 2012;14:22-8.
20. Beckjord EB, Rechis R, Nutt S, et al. What do people affected by cancer think about electronic health information exchange? Results from the 2010 LIVESTRONG Electronic Health Information Exchange Survey and the 2008 Health Information National Trends Survey. J Oncol Pract 2011;7:237-41.
21. Ley P, Whitworth MA, Skilbeck CE, et al. Improving doctor-patient communication in general practice. J Royal Coll Gen Pract 1976;26:720-4.
22. Johnson AJ, Easterling D, Nelson R, et al. Access to radiologic reports via a patient portal: clinical simulations to investigate patient preferences. J Am Coll Radiol 2012;9:256-63.
23. ZielstorffRD. Controlled vocabularies for consumer health. J Biomed Inform 2003;36:326-33.
24. Zeng-Treitler Q, Kim H, Hunter M, edis. Improving patient comprehension and recall of discharge instructions by supplementing free texts with pictographs. American Medical Informatics Association (AMIA) Annual Symposium Proceedings 2008; 2008:849-53.
25. Houts PS, Doak CC, Doak LG, et al. The role of pictures in improving health communication: a review of research on attention, comprehension, recall, and adherence. Patient Educ Couns 2006;61:173-90.
26. RSNA Image Share Network Reaches First Patients. http://www.rsna.org/NewsDetail. aspx?id=2409
27. lifeIMAGE. https://cloud.lifeimage.com
28. Dell Unified Clinical Archive. http://content.dell.com/us/en/healthcare/healthcare-medicalarchiving-unified-clinical-archive.aspx
29. Miller T, Leroy G, Wood E, eds. Dynamic generation of a table of contents with consumer-friendly labels. American Medical Informatics Association (AMIA) Annual Symposium Proceedings 2006; 2006:559-63.
30. Maddock C, Camporesi S, Lewis I, et al. Online information as a decision making aid for cancer patients: recommendations from the Eurocancercoms project. Eur J Cancer 2011;48:1055-9.
31. Grant RW, Wald JS, Poon EG, et al. Design and implementation of a web-based patient portal linked to an ambulatory care electronic health record: patient gateway for diabetes collaborative care. Diabetes Technol Ther 2006;8:576-86.
32. Schnipper JL, Gandhi TK, Wald JS, et al. Design and implementation of a web-based patient portal linked to an electronic health record designed to improve medication safety: the patient gateway medications module. Inform Prim Care 2008;16:147-55.
33. Zeng-Treitler Q, Goryachev S, Kim H, et al. Making texts in electronic health records comprehensible to consumers: a prototype translator. AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings. American Medical Informatics Association, 2007.
34. Cardillo E, Tamilin A, Serafini L. A methodology for knowledge acquisition in consumer-oriented healthcare. Knowledge discovery, knowledge engineering and knowledge management. Springer, 2011:249-61.
35. Brennan PF, Downs S, Casper G. Project HealthDesign: rethinking the power and potential of personal health records. J Biomed Inform 2010;43:S3-5.
36. Adnan M, Warren J, Orr M. Enhancing patient readability of discharge summaries with automatically generated hyperlinks. Health Care and Informatics Review Online. 2009.
37. Savova GK, Masanz JJ, Ogren PV, et al. Mayo clinical text analysis and knowledge extraction system (cTAKES): architecture, component evaluation and applications. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2010;17:507-13.
38. Chapman WW, Bridewell W, Hanbury P, et al. A simple algorithm for identifying negated findings and diseases in discharge summaries. J Biomed Inform 2001;34:301-10.
39. Davidson JR, Brundage MD, Feldman-Stewart D. Lung cancer treatment decisions: patients' desires for participation and information. Psycho Oncol 1999;8:511-20.
40. Jenkins V, Fallowfield L, Saul J. Information needs of patients with cancer: results from a large study in UK cancer centres. Br J Cancer 2001;84:48.
41. Leydon GM, Boulton M, Moynihan C, et al. Cancer patients' information needs and information seeking behaviour: in depth interview study. BMJ 2000;320:909-13.
42. Hripcsak G, Rothschild AS. Agreement, the f-measure, and reliability in information retrieval. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2005;12:296-8.
43. Fleiss JL. Measuring agreement between two judges on the presence or absence of a trait. Biometrics 1975:651-9.
44. Manning CD, Raghavan P, Schütze H. Introduction to information retrieval. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.
45. Nyul LG, Udupa JK, Zhang X. New variants of a method of MRI scale standardization. Med Imaging IEEE Trans 2000;19:143-50.
46. Smith SM, Jenkinson M, Woolrich MW, et al. Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL. Neuroimage 2004;23:S208-19.
47. Zeng-Treitler Q, Tse T, Crowell J, et al. edn. Identifying consumer-friendly display (CFD) names for health concepts. American Medical Informatics Association (AMIA) Annual Symposium Proceedings 2005;2005:859-63.
48. Ross SE, Moore LA, Earnest MA, et al. Providing a web-based online medical record with electronic communication capabilities to patients with congestive heart failure: randomized trial. J Med Internet Res 2004;6:e12.
49. Earnest MA, Ross SE, Wittevrongel L, et al. Use of a patient-accessible electronic medical record in a practice for congestive heart failure: patient and physician experiences. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2004;11:410-7.
50. Langlotz CP. RadLex: a new method for indexing online educational materials1. RadioGraphics 2006;26:1595-7.
51. Kim H, Goryachev S, Rosemblat G, et al. eds. Beyond surface characteristics: a new health text-specific readability measurement. American Medical Informatics Association (AMIA) Annual Symposium Proceedings 2007; 2007;418-22.
52. Taylor WL. "Cloze procedure": a new tool for measuring readability. Journalism Quarterly 1953;30:415-33.
53. Keselman A, Logan R, Smith CA, et al. Developing informatics tools and strategies for consumer-centered health communication. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2008;15:473-83.
54. Ross SE, Lin CT. A randomized controlled trial of a patient accessible medical record. American Medical Informatics Association (AMIA) Annual Symposium Proceedings 2003;2003:990.
55. Detmer D, Bloomrosen M, Raymond B, et al. Integrated personal health records: transformative tools for consumer-centric care. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2008;8:45.
56. Meredith C, Symonds P, Webster L, et al. Information needs of cancer patients in West Scotland: cross sectional survey of patients' views. BMJ 1996;313:724-6.
57. Walker J, Leveille SG, Ngo L, et al. Inviting patients to read their doctors' notes: patients and doctors look ahead. Ann Intern Med 2011;155:811-19.
58. Delbanco T, Walker J, Bell SK, et al. Inviting patients to read their doctors' notes: a quasi-experimental study and a look ahead. Ann Intern Med 2012;157:461-70.
59. Baldry M, Cheal C, Fisher B, et al. Giving patients their own records in general practice: experience of patients and staff. BMJ (Clinical Res Ed) 1986;292:596-98.
60. Pratt W, Unruh K, Civan A, et al. Personal health information management: integrating personal health information helps people manage their lives and actively participate in their own health care. Commun ACM 2006;49:51-5.