Interview Measures of Interpersonal Functioning and Quality of Object Relations

Handbook of Interpersonal Psychology: Theory, Research, Assessment, and Therapeutic Interventions

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 343-356

  Schauenburg, Henning ^a   Grande, Tilman ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Interpersonal patterns; Interview measures; Object relations; Operationalized psychodynamic diagnosis

Indexed keywords

EID: 84886124973     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9781118001868.ch21     Document Type: Chapter

References (68)

1. Albani, C., Kächele, H., Pokorny, D., & Blaser, G. (2008). Beziehungsmuster und Beziehungskonflikte-Theorie, Klinik und Forschung (eBook). Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
2. Anchin, J. C.&Kiesler, D. J. (1982). Handbook of interpersonal psychotherapy. New York: Pergamon.
3. Azim, H. F., Piper, W. E., Segal, P. M., Nixon, G. W. H., & Duncan, S. (1991). The Quality of Object Relations Scale. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic, 55, 323-343.
4. Benecke, C., Koschier, A., Peham, D., Bock, A., Dahlbender, R. W., Biebl, W., & Doering, S. (2009). Erste Ergebnisse zu Reliabilität und Validität der OPD-2 Strukturachse. Zeitischrift für Psychosomatik, Medizinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie, 55, 84-96.
5. Benjamin, L. S. (1974). A structural analysis of social behavior (SASB). Psychological Review, 81, 392-425.
6. Benjamin, L. S. (1979). Use of structural analysis of social behavior (SASB) and Markov chains to study dyadic interactions. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 88, 303-319.
7. Benjamin, L. S. (1993). Interpersonal diagnosis and treatment of personality disorders. New York/ London: Guilford Press.
8. Betan, E., Heim,A.K., Conklin, C. Z.,&Westen,D. (2005). Countertransference phenomena and personality pathology in clinical practice: An empirical investigation. American Journal of Psychiatry, 162, 890-898.
9. Binder, J. L. (2004). Key competencies in brief dynamic psychotherapy. New York:, Guilford Press.
10. Chance, S., Bakeman, R., Kaslow, N., Farber, E., & Burg-Callaway, K. (2000). Core conflictual relationship themes in patients diagnosedwith borderline personalitydisorderwho attempted or who did not attempt suicide. Psychotherapy Research, 10, 337-350.
11. Cicchetti,D.V. (1994).Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychological Assessment, 6, 284-290.
12. Cierpka,M., Grande, T., Stasch, M., Oberbracht, C., Schneider,W., Schüssler,G.,&Heuft,G. (2001). Zur Validität der Operationalisierten Psychodynamischen Diagnostik (OPD). Psychotherapeut, 46, 122-133.
13. Cierpka, M., Strack, M., Benninghoven, D., Staats, H., Dahlbender, R., Pokorny, D., & Frevert, G. (1998). Stereotypical relationship patterns and psychopathology. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 67, 241-248.
14. Cierpka, M., Grande, T., Rudolf, G., von der Tann, M., & Stasch, M. (2007). The OperationalizedPsychodynamic Diagnostics System: Clinical relevance, reliability and validity. Psychopathology, 40, 209-220.
15. Clarkin, J. F.,Foelsch,P.A.,&Kernberg,O. F. (2000). Inventory of PersonalityOrganization.NewYork: Weill Medical College of Cornell University.
16. Cohen, J. (1968). Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychological Bulletin, 70, 213-220.
17. Crits-Christoph, P., Demorest, A., & Connolly, M. B. (1990). Quantitative assessment of interpersonal themes over the course of psychotherapy. Psychotherapy, 27, 513-522.
18. Cierpka, M., Grande, T., Rudolf, G., von der Tann, M., & Stasch, M. (2007). The Operationalized Psychodynamic Diagnostics System: Clinical relevance, reliability and validity. Psychopathology. 40, 209-220.
19. Emde, R. M. (1981). Changing models of infancy and the nature of early development: Remodelling the foundations. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 29, 179-219.
20. Fleiss, J. L., & Cohen, J. (1973). The equivalence of weighted kappa and the intraclass correlation coefficient as measures of reliability. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 33, 613-619.
21. Fleiss, J. L. (1981). Statistical methods for rates and proportions (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
22. Fonagy, P., Gergely, G., Jurist, E. L., & Target, M. (2002). Affect regulation, mentalization, and the development of the self . New York: Other Press.
23. Fonagy, P., &, Target, M. (1997). Attachment and reflective function: The role in selforganization. Development and Psychopathology, 9, 679-700.
24. Fonagy, P., Target, M., Steele, H., & Steele, M. (1998). Reflective Functioning manual. Version 5: for application to Adult Attachment Interviews. Unpublishedmanual, University College, London.
25. Gergely, G. (2002). Ein neuer Zugang zu Margaret Mahler: Normaler Autismus, Symbiose, Spaltung, libidin öse Objektkonstanz aus der Perspektive der kognitiven Entwicklungspsychologie. Psyche, 56, 8009-8038.
26. Grande, T., Rudolf, G., & Oberbracht, C. (1998). Die Strukturachse der Operationalisierten Psychodynamischen Diagnostik (OPD)- Forschungsergebnisse zum Konzept und zur klinischen Anwendung. Persönlichkeitsstörungen: Theorie und Therapie, 2, 173-182.
27. Grande, T., Schauenburg, H., & Rudolf, G. (2002). Zum Begriff der ''Struktur'' in verschiedenen Operationalisierungen. In G. Rudolf, T. Grande, & P. Henningsen (Eds), Die Struktur der Persönlichkeit. Vom theoretischen Verständnis zur therapeutischen Anwendung des psychodynamischen Strukturkonzepts (pp. 177-196). Stuttgart: Schattauer.
28. Grande, T., Rudolf, G., & Jakobsen, T. (2004). Beziehungsdynamische Fallformulierung, Fokusbildung und Interventionsplanung auf der Grundlage der OPD-Beziehungsdiagnostik. In R.W. Dahlbender, P. Buchheim, & G. Schüssler (Eds.), Lernen an der Praxis. OPD und Qualitätssicherung in der Psychodynamischen Psychotherapie (pp. 95-109). Bern: Huber.
29. Grawe-Gerber, M., & Benjamin, L. S. (1989). Structural Analysis of Social Behavior: Coding manual for psychotherapy research. Forschungsberichte aus dem Psychologischen Institut der Universit ät Bern.
30. Grossmann, K. E., Becker-Stoll, F., Grossmann, K., Kindler, H., Schiechem, M., Spengler, G., . . . Zimmermann, P. (1989). Die Bindungstheorie. Modell und entwicklungspsychologische Forschung. In H. Keller (Ed.), Handbuch der Kleinkindforschung (pp. 51-95). Heidelberg: Springer.
31. Grütering, T., &, Schauenburg, H. (2000). Die Erfassung psychodynamisch relevanter Pers önlichkeitsmerkmale Vergleich zweier klinischer Instrumente: Karolinska Psychodynamic Profile (KAPP) und OPD-Strukturachse. In M. Bassler (Ed.), Leitlinien in der stationären Psychotherapie: Pro und Kontra (pp. 115-137). Giessen: Psychosozial Verlag.
32. Hamilton, J., & Kivlighan, D. (2009). Therapists' projection: The effects of therapists' relationship themes on their formulation of clients' relationship episodes. Psychotherapy Research, 19 (3), 312-322.
33. Horowitz, M. (1989). Relationship schema formulation: Role-relationship models and intrapsychic conflict. Psychiatry, 52, 260-274.
34. Horowitz, M. J. (1991). Person schemas. In M. J. Horowitz (Ed.), Person schemas and maladaptive interpersonal patterns (pp. 13-31). Chicago/ London: University of Chicago Press.
35. Horowitz, L. M. (1994). Personenschemata, Psychopathologie und Psychotherapieforschung. Psychotherapeut, 39, 61-72.
36. Horowitz, L. M., Rosenberg, S. E., Baer, B. A., Ureno, G., & Villasenor, V. S. (1988). Inventory of Interpersonal Problems: Psychometric properties and clinical applications. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 885-892.
37. Horowitz, L. M., Strauss, B., & Kordy, H. (2000). Inventar zu Erfassung interpersonaler Probleme (2. Aufl.) (Inventory of Interpersonal Problems, 2nd ed.). Göttingen, Germany: Beltz.
38. Huprich, S. K., & Greenberg, R. P. (2003). Advances in the assessment of object relations in the 1990s. Clinical Psychology Review, 23, 665-698.
39. Kernberg, O. F. (1989). Psychodynamic psychotherapy of borderline patients. New York: Basic Books.
40. Kiesler, D. J. (1983). The 1982 Interpersonal Circle: A taxonomy for complementarity in human transactions. Psychological Review, 90, 185-214.
41. Leising, D., Stadler, K., Grande, T., & Rudolf G. (2000). Lassen sich intrapsychische Konflikte anhand unterschiedlicher ''Leitaffekte'' unterscheiden? Eine Validierungsstudie zur OPD-Achse III. Poster präsentiert auf der Tagung OPD in research and practice, Ulm, September 28-30, 2000.
42. Lichtenberg, J. D. (1983). Psychoanalysis and infant research. Hillsdale/London: Analytic Press.
43. Luborsky, L. (1988). Einführung in die analytische Psychotherapie. Ein Lehrbuch. Berlin: Springer.
44. Luborsky, L. (1990a). A guide to the CCRT method. In L. Luborsky & P. Crits-Christoph (Eds.), Understanding transference (pp. 15-36). New York: Basic Books.
45. Luborsky, L. (1990b). The Relationship Anecdote Paradigm (RAP) Interview as a versatile source of narratives. In L. Luborsky & P. Crits- Christoph (Eds.), Understanding transference (pp. 102-113). New York: Basic Books.
46. Michels, R., Siebel, U., Freyberger, H. J., Schönell, H., & Dilling, H. (2001). Evaluation of the multiaxial system of ICD-10 (preliminary draft): Correlations between multiaxial assessment and clinical judgements of aetiology, treatment indication and prognosis. Psychopathology, 34, 69-74.
47. Müller, C., Kaufhold, J., Overbeck, G., & Grabhorn, R. (2006). The importance of reflective functioning to the diagnosis of psychic structure. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, and Practice, 79, 485-494.
48. OPD Task Force (Eds.) (2001). Operationalized Psychodynamic Diagnosis (OPD): Foundations and manual. Kirkland: Hogrefe & Huber.
49. OPD Task Force (Eds.) (2007). Operationalized Psychodynamic Diagnosis (OPD-2): Manual of diagnosis and treatment planning. Göttingen: Hogrefe & Huber.
50. Papousek, M. (1989). Frühe Phase der Eltern-Kind- Beziehung. Praxis der Psychotherapie und Psychosomatik, 34, 109-122.
51. Piper, W. E., & Duncan, S. C. (1999). Object relations theory and short-term dynamic psychotherapy: Findings from the Quality of Object Relations Scale. Clinical Psychology Review, 19, 669-685.
52. Rudolf, G. (2002). Struktur als psychodynamisches Konzept der Persönlichkeit. Vom theoretischen Verständnis zur therapeutischen Anwendung des psychodynamischen Strukturkonzepts. In G. Rudolf, T. Grande, & P. Henningsen (Eds.), Die Struktur der Persönlichkeit (pp. 2-48). Stuttgart: Schattauer.
53. Rudolf, G. (2006). Strukturbezogene Psychotherapie. Leitfaden zur psychodynamischen Therapie struktureller Störungen. Stuttgart/New York: Schattauer.
54. Rudolf, G., Grande, T., Oberbracht, C., & Jakobsen, T. (1996). Erste empirische Untersuchungen zu einem neuen diagnostischen System: Die Operationalisierte Psychodynamische Diagnostik (OPD). Zeitschrift für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychoanalyse, 42, 343-357.
55. Schacht, T. E., & Henry, W.P. (1994). Modeling recurrent patterns of interpersonal relationship with Structural Analysis of Social Behavior: The SASB-CMP. Psychotherapy Research, 4, 208-221.
56. Schauenburg, H. (2000). Zum Verhältnis zwischen Bindungsdiagnostik und psychodynamischer Diagnostik. In W. Schneider & H. W. Freyberger (Eds.), Was leistet die OPD? Empirische Befunde und klinische Erfahrungen mit der Operationalisierten Psychodynamischen Diagnostik (pp. 196-217). Bern: Huber.
57. Staats, H., May, M., Herrmann, C. H., Kersting, A., & König, K. (1998). Different patterns of change in narratives ofmen andwomen during analytical group psychotherapy. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 48, 363-380.
58. Stasch, M., & Cierpka, M. (2000). Changes in patients' perceptions of their interpersonal behavior during inpatient psychotherapy. 31st Annual Meeting of Society of Psychotherapy Research, Chicago, June 2000.
59. Stasch, M., Cierpka, M., Dahlbender, R. W., Grande, T., Hillenbrand, E., Kraul, A., & Schauenburg, H. (2004). OPD und Repräsentation interpersonellen Beziehungsverhaltens: Ein Ansatz zur Konstruktvalidierung. In R. W. Dahlbender, P. Buchheim, & G. Schüssler (Eds.), Lernen an der Praxis. OPD und die Qualitätssicherung in der psychodynamischen Psychotherapie (pp. 85-94). Bern: Huber.
60. Stasch, M., Cierpka, M., Hillenbrand, E., & Schmal, H. (2002). Assessing reenactment in inpatient psychodynamic therapy. Psychotherapy Research, 12 (3), 355-368.
61. Stern, D. N. (1985). The interpersonal world of the infant. A view from psychoanalytic and development psychology. New York: Basic Books.
62. Stern, D.N. (1995). Themotherhood constellation. New York: Basic Books.
63. Strupp, H. H., & Binder, J. L. (1984). Psychotherapy in a new key: A guide to time-limited dynamic psychotherapy. New York: Basic Books.
64. Wallerstein, R. S. (1988). Assessment of structural change in psychoanalytical therapy and research. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 1988, 36, 241-261.
65. Weinryb, R. M., & Rössel, R. J. (1991). Karolinska Psychodynamic ProfileKAPP. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavia, 83, 1-23.
66. Weiss, J., Sampson, H., & Mount Zion Psychotherapy Research Group (1986). The psychoanalytic process: Theory, clinical observation and empirical research. New York: Guilford Press.
67. Westen, D. (1991). Social cognition and object relations. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 429-455.
68. Zimmermann, J., Stasch, M., Rost, R., Hunger, C., Schauenburg, H., Grande, T., & Cierpka, M. (2009). Can you see what I see? Tapping into the discrepancy between patients' and observers' interpersonal problem description using a Q-sort approach. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Psychotherapy Research, Santiago de Chile.