Tree representations in probabilistic models for extended named entities detection

EACL 2012 - 13th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 174-184

  Dinarelli, Marco ^a   Rosset, Sophie ^a  

^a CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTEXT FREE GRAMMARS; FORESTRY; LINGUISTICS; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

BROADCAST DATA; CONDITIONAL RANDOM FIELD; NAMED ENTITY RECOGNITION; PARSING ALGORITHM; PROBABILISTIC CONTEXT FREE GRAMMARS; PROBABILISTIC MODELS; TREE REPRESENTATION; TREE STRUCTURES;

TREES (MATHEMATICS);

EID: 84886098679     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. Ralph Grishman and Beth Sundheim. 1996. Message Understanding Conference-6: A brief history. In Proceedings of the 16th conference on Computational linguistics, Volume 1, pages 466-471, Stroudsburg, PA, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
2. Satoshi Sekine and Chikashi Nobata. 2004. Definition, Dictionaries and Tagger for Extended Named Entity Hierarchy. In Proceedings of LREC.
3. G. Doddington, A. Mitchell, M. Przybocki, L. Ramshaw, S. Strassel, and R. Weischedel. 2004. The Automatic Content Extraction (ACE) Program-Tasks, Data, and Evaluation. Proceedings of LREC 2004, pages 837-840.
4. Cyril Grouin, Sophie Rosset, Pierre Zweigenbaum, Karn Fort, Olivier Galibert, Ludovic Quintard. 2011. Proposal for an extension or traditional named entities: From guidelines to evaluation, an overview. In Proceedings of the Linguistic Annotation Workshop (LAW).
5. J. Lafferty, A. McCallum, and F. Pereira. 2001. Conditional random fields: Probabilistic models for segmenting and labeling sequence data. In Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), pages 282-289, Williamstown, MA, USA, June.
6. Mark Johnson. 1998. Pcfg models of linguistic tree representations. Computational Linguistics, 24:613-632.
7. Stefan Hahn, Marco Dinarelli, Christian Raymond, Fabrice Lefèvre, Patrick Lehen, Renato De Mori, Alessandro Moschitti, Hermann Ney, and Giuseppe Riccardi. 2010. Comparing stochastic approaches to spoken language understanding in multiple languages. IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech and Language Processing (TASLP), 99.
8. Adam L. Berger, Stephen A. Della Pietra, and Vincent J. Della Pietra. 1996. A maximum entropy approach to natural language processing. Computational Linguistics, 22:39-71.
9. Thomas Lavergne, Olivier Capṕe, and Francois Yvon. 2010. Practical very large scale CRFs. In Proceedings the 48th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), pages 504-513. Association for Computational Linguistics, July.
10. Stefan Riezler and Alexander Vasserman. 2004. Incremental feature selection and l1 regularization for relaxed maximum-entropy modeling. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Empirical Methods for Natural Language Processing (EMNLP).
11. Hui Zou and Trevor Hastie. 2005. Regularization and variable selection via the Elastic Net. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B, 67:301-320.
12. Eugene Charniak. 1997. Statistical parsing with a context-free grammar and word statistics. In Proceedings of the fourteenth national conference on artificial intelligence and ninth conference on Innovative applications of artificial intelligence, AAAI'97/IAAI'97, pages 598-603. AAAI Press.
13. Eugene Charniak. 2000. A maximum-entropyinspired parser. In Proceedings of the 1st North American chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics conference, pages 132-139, San Francisco, CA, USA. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.
14. Sharon A. Caraballo and Eugene Charniak. 1997. New figures of merit for best-first probabilistic chart parsing. Computational Linguistics, 24:275-298.
15. Michael Collins. 1997. Three generative, lexicalised models for statistical parsing. In Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and Eighth Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL '98, pages 16-23, Stroudsburg, PA, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
16. Eugene Charniak, Sharon Goldwater, and Mark Johnson. 1998. Edge-based best-first chart parsing. In In Proceedings of the Sixth Workshop on Very Large Corpora, pages 127-133. Morgan Kaufmann.
17. Alexandre Allauzen and Héĺene Bonneau-Maynard. 2008. Training and evaluation of pos taggers on the French multitag corpus. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC'08), Marrakech, Morocco, may.
18. Olivier Galibert. 2009. Approches et ḿethodologies pour la ŕeponse automatique à des questions adaptées à un cadre interactif en domaine ouvert. Ph.D. thesis, Université Paris Sud, Orsay.
19. Rosset Sophie, Galibert Olivier, Bernard Guillaume, Bilinski Eric, and Adda Gilles. The LIMSI multilingual, multitask QAst system. In Proceedings of the 9th Cross-language evaluation forum conference on Evaluating systems for multilingual and multimodal information access, CLEF'08, pages 480-487, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2009. Springer- Verlag.
20. Azeddine Zidouni, Sophie Rosset, and Hervé Glotin. 2010. Efficient combined approach for named entity recognition in spoken language. In Proceedings of the International Conference of the Speech Communication Assosiation (Interspeech), Makuhari, Japan.
21. John Makhoul, Francis Kubala, Richard Schwartz, and Ralph Weischedel. 1999. Performance measures for information extraction. In Proceedings of DARPA Broadcast News Workshop, pages 249-252.
22. Adwait Ratnaparkhi. 1999. Learning to Parse Natural Language with Maximum Entropy Models. Journal of Machine Learning, vol. 34, issue 1-3, pages 151- 175.
23. Michael Collins and Terry Koo. 2005. Discriminative Re-ranking for Natural Language Parsing. Journal of Machine Learning, vol. 31, issue 1, pages 25-70.
24. Clark, Stephen and Curran, James R. 2007. Wide- Coverage Efficient Statistical Parsing with CCG and Log-Linear Models. Journal of Computational Linguistics, vol. 33, issue 4, pages 493-552.
25. Finkel, Jenny R. and Kleeman, Alex and Manning, Christopher D. 2008. Efficient, Feature-based, Conditional Random Field Parsing. Proceedings of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 959-967, Columbus, Ohio.
26. Michael Auli and Adam Lopez 2011. Training a Log- Linear Parser with Loss Functions via Softmax- Margin. Proceedings of Empirical Methods for Natural Language Processing, pages 333-343, Edinburgh, U.K.
27. Tang Jie and Hong Ming, Cai Li, Juan-Zi and Liang Bangyong. 2006. Tree-Structured Conditional Random Fields for Semantic Annotation. Proceedgins of the International Semantic Web Conference, pages 640-653, Edited by Springer.
28. Olivier Galibert; Sophie Rosset; Cyril Grouin; Pierre Zweigenbaum; Ludovic Quintard. 2011. Structured and Extended Named Entity Evaluation in Automatic Speech Transcriptions. IJCNLP 2011.
29. Marco Dinarelli, Sophie Rosset. Models Cascade for Tree-Structured Named Entity Detection IJCNLP 2011.