Ethical Issues in Qualitative Mental Health Research

Qualitative Research Methods in Mental Health and Psychotherapy: A Guide for Students and Practitioners

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 23-37

  Thompson, Andrew R ^a   Chambers, Eleni ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

'Ethics' or moral principles guiding action, derived from philosophical theories; Codes, principles and laws judgement, and everyday practice; Ethical issues and form of data collection; Ethical issues, in qualitative mental health research; Informed consent, respect for autonomy central to ethical codes; Professional codes of practice of mental health practitioners, and guidance; Research Ethics Committees (RECs) vulnerability and capability, of active participants; Self awareness and ethical dilemmas, mental health practitioners and competency; Specific ethical dilemmas encountered by mental health practitioners, in research; Vulnerable participants and sensitive topics researcher and researched

Indexed keywords

EID: 84886056289     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9781119973249.ch3     Document Type: Chapter

References (55)

1. Adamis, D., Martin, F., Treloar, A. &Macdonald, D. (2005). Capacity, consent, and selection bias in a study of delirium. Journal of Medical Ethics, 31, 137-143.
2. Allmark, P., Boote, J., Chambers, E., Clarke, A., McDonnell, A., Thompson, A.R., et al. (2009). Ethical issues in the use of in-depth interviews: Literature review and discussion. Research Ethics Review, 5, 48-54.
3. American Psychological Association. (2010). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct (amended). Washington, DC: APA.
4. Banks, S. (2009). Fromprofessional ethics to ethics in professional life: Implications for learning, teaching and study'. Ethics and Social Welfare, 3, 55-63.
5. Banks, S., Allmark, P., Barnes, M., Barr, H., Bryant, L., Cowburn, M., et al. (2010). Interprofessional ethics: A developing field? Notes from the Ethics and Social Welfare Conference, Sheffield, UK, May 2010. Ethics and SocialWelfare, 4, 3. First published on: 29 October 2010 (iFirst) DOI: 10.1080/17496535.2010.516116.
6. Beauchamp, T.L. & Childress, J.F. (2001). Principles of biomedical ethics (5th edn). New York: Oxford University Press.
7. Brinkmann, S. & Kvale, S. (2008). Ethics in qualitative psychological research. In C. Willig & W. Stainton-Rogers (Eds.)The Sage handbook of qualitative research in psychology. 263-279). London: Sage.
8. Bristol Royal Infirmary Inquiry. (2001). The Report of the Public Inquiry into children's heart surgery at the Bristol Royal Infirmary1984-1995: Learning from Bristol. London: The Stationary Office Limited.
9. British Association of Social Workers. (2002). The code of ethics for social work. Birmingham: British Association of SocialWorkers.
10. British Psychological Society. (2005). Good practice guidelines for the conduct of psychological research within the NHS. Leicester: British Psychological Society.
11. British Psychological Society. (2006). Code of ethics and conduct. Leicester: British Psychological Society.
12. British Psychological Society. (2007). Conducting research on the internet: Guidelines for ethical practice in psychological research online. Leicester: British Psychological Society.
13. British Psychological Society. (2008). Conducting research with people not having the capacity to consent to their participation: A practical guide for researchers. Leicester: British Psychological Society.
14. Bryant, L. & Beckett, J. (2006). The practicality and acceptability of an advocacy service in the emergency department for people attending following self-harm. Retrieved 14 September 2010, from University of Leeds, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, web site http://www.leeds.ac.uk/lihs/psychiatry/staff/beckett_j.htm.
15. Carrick, R. (2006). Service user's ethical priorities for psychological research. Doctoral thesis, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.
16. Clark, C.C., Scott, E.A., Boydell, K.M. & Goering, P. (1999). Effects of client interviewers on client-reported satisfaction with mental health services. Psychiatric Services, 50, 961-963.
17. Clarke, A. (2006). Qualitative interviewing: encountering ethical issues and challenges. Nurse Researcher, 13, 19-29.
18. Coyle, A. (1998). Qualitative research in counselling psychology:Using the counselling interview as a research instrument. In P. Clarkson (Ed.) Counselling psychology: Integrating theory, research and supervised practice (pp. 56-73). London: Routledge.
19. Coyle, A.&Wright, C. (1996). Using the counselling interview to collect research data on sensitive topics. Journal of Health Psychology, 1, 431-440.
20. Critical Psychiatry Website. Critical Psychiatry Webpage. Retrieved 24 September 2010 from http://www.uea.ac.uk/~wp276/psychiatryanti.htm.
21. Davison, J. (2004). Dilemmas in research: issues of vulnerability and disempowerment for the social worker/researcher. Journal of Social Work Practice, 18, 379-393.
22. Department of Health. (1991). Local research ethics committees. London: Department of Health.
23. Department of Health. (2005). Research governance framework for Health and Social care (2nd edn). Retrieved 30 June 2009 fromhttp://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/ Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_4008777.
24. Department of Health. (2007). Best research for best health: A new national health research strategy. Retrieved 30 June 2009 from http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/ Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/Browsable/DH_4127225.
25. Donnison, J., Thompson, A.R. & Turpin, G. (2009). A qualitative study of the conceptualmodels employed by community mental health team staff. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 18, 310-317.
26. Forbat, L. & Henderson, J. (2003). "Stuck in the middle with you": the ethics and process of qualitative researchwith two people in an intimate relationship. QualitativeHealth Research, 13, 1453-1462.
27. Fossey, E., Epstein, M., Findlay, R., Plant, G. & Harvey, C. (2002). Creating a positive experience of research for people with psychiatric disabilities by sharing feedback. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 25, 369-378.
28. Francis, R.D. (2009). Ethics for psychologists (2nd edn). Oxford: BPS Blackwell.
29. Gleeson, K. & Mortimore, C. (2010). The process model for research supervision on the Bristol course. Clinical Psychology Forum, 213, 29-33.
30. Goodacre, S.W. (2010). Falling research in the NHS: Abolish new research governance infrastructure. British Medical Journal, 340, c3449.
31. Graham, J., Grewal, I.&Lewis, J. (2007). Ethics in social research:The views of research participants. NatCen: London.
32. Graham, J., Lewis J. & Nicolaas, G. (2006). A review of literature on empirical studies of ethical requirements and research participation. ESRC/NatCen: London.
33. Haggerty, K.D. (2004). Ethics creep: Governing social science research in the name of ethics. Qualitative Sociology, 27, 391-414.
34. Health Professions Council. (2008). Standard of conduct, performance and ethics (2nd edn). Retrieved 24 September 2010 from http://www.hpc-uk.org/publications/index.asp?id=38.
35. Holland, K. (2007). The epistemological bias of ethics review: Constraining mental health research. Qualitative Inquiry, 13, 895-913.
36. INVOLVE. (2004) Ethics review in social care research: Option appraisal and guidelines by Jan Pahl: A response from INVOLVE. Retrieved 7 September 2010 from http://www.invo.org.uk/search.asp.
37. Jenkins, R. (2008). What do we mean by vulnerable? Presentation retrieved 9 September 2010 from University of Sheffield, Research Ethics Pages website: http://www.shef.ac.uk/ris/ gov_ethics_grp/ethics/vulnerable.html.
38. Liamputtong, P. (2007). Researching the vulnerable: A guide to sensitive research methods. London: Sage.
39. National Research Ethics Service. (2009). Information sheets and consent forms: Guidance for researchers and reviewers. Retrieved 14 September 2010 fromhttp://www.nres.npsa.nhs.uk/ applications/guidance/consent-guidance-and-forms/?esctl1431725_entryid62=67013.
40. National Research Ethics Service and INVOLVE. (2009). Statement: Patient and public involvement in research and research ethics committee review. Retrieved 7 September 2010 from http://www.invo.org.uk/search.asp.
41. Nursing andMidwiferyCouncil. (2010). The code: Standards of conduct, performance and ethics for nurses and midwives. Retrieved 24 September 2010 from http://www.nmc-uk.org/.
42. Oakley, A. (1981). Interviewing women: a contradiction in terms. In H. Roberts (Ed.) Doing feminist research (pp. 30-61). London: Routledge.
43. Rosenblatt, P.C. (1995). Ethics of qualitative interviewing with grieving families. Death Studies, 19, 139-155.
44. Royal Liverpool Children's Inquiry. (2001). Royal Liverpool Children's Inquiry Report. London: The Stationary Office Limited.
45. Ruzek, J. & Zatzick, D. (2000). Ethical considerations in research participation among acutely injured trauma survivors:An empirical investigation. GeneralHospital Psychiatry, 22, 27-36.
46. Scott, D., Valery, P., Boyle, F. & Bain, C. (2002). Does research into sensitive areas do harm? Experiences of research participation after a child's diagnosis with Ewing's sarcoma. Medical Journal of Australia, 177, 507-510.
47. Small, R. (2001). Codes are not enough: What philosophy can contribute to the ethics of educational research. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 35, 387-406.
48. Sweeney, A., Beresford, P., Faulkner, A., Nettle, M. & Rose, D. (2009). This is survivor research. Ross-on-Wye: PCCS Books.
49. Thompson, A.R.&Russo, K. (in press). Ethical dilemmas for clinical psychologists in conducting qualitative research. Qualitative Research in Psychology.
50. Wolfensberger, W. (1972). The principles of normalisation in human services. Toronto: National Institute on Mental Retardation.
51. WorldMedical Association. (2002). 'Declaration ofHelsinki' ethical principles formedical research involving human subjects. Washington:World Medical Association, Washington:World Medical Association.
52. National Research Ethics Service (NRES): www.nres.npsa.nhs.uk. This is the website for research ethics in theNHS and contains useful information on all aspects of NHS ethical procedures. For example, detailed information is provided about designing consent and information forms.
53. Research EthicsGuidebook. Aresource for social scientists:www.ethicsguidebook.ac.uk. This helpful site sponsored by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) provides additional information in considering ethical issues at all stages of the research process SocialCare.
54. Research EthicsCommittee:www.screc.org.uk. Thiswebsite provides information about applying for research ethics review, when conducting research in social service and other community settings and who to contact for further help.
55. Wallcraft, J., Amering, M. & Schrank, B. (2009). Handbook of service user involvement in mental health research. Oxford:Wiley-Blackwell.