Exchange of Mercury between the Atmosphere and Terrestrial Ecosystems

Environmental Chemistry and Toxicology of Mercury

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 423-451

  Gustin, Mae Sexauer ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA   (United States)

Author keywords

Measured fluxes; Mercury, air terrestrial exchange; Terrestrial ecosystem Hg exchange

Indexed keywords

EID: 84886027936     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9781118146644.ch13     Document Type: Chapter

References (122)

1. Bash JO, Miller DR. Growing season total gaseous mercury (TGM) flux measurements over an Acer rubrum L. stand. Atmos Environ 2009;43:5953-5961.
2. Biester H, Bindler R, Martinez-Cortizas A, Engstrom DR. Modeling the past atmospheric deposition of mercury using natural archives. Environ Sci Technol 2007;41:4851-4860.
3. Brooks S, Arimoto R, Lindberg S, Southworth G. Antarctic polar plateau snow surface conversion of deposited oxidized mercury to gaseous elemental mercury with fractional long-term burial. Atmos Environ 2008;42:2877-2884.
4. Bushey JT, Nallana AG, Montesdeoca MR, Driscoll CT. Mercury dynamics of a northern hardwood canopy. Atmos Environ 2008;42:6905-6914.
5. Caldwell CA, Swartzendruber P, Prestbo E. Concentration and dry deposition of mercury species in arid south central New Mexico (2001-2002). Environ Sci Technol 2006;40:7535-7540.
6. Carpi A, Frei A, Cocris D, McCloskey R, Contreras E, Ferguson K. Analytical artifacts produced by a polycarbonate chamber compared to a Teflon chamber for measuring surface mercury fluxes. Anal Bioanal Chem 2007;388:361-365.
7. Carpi A, Lindberg SE. Sunlight-mediated emission of elemental mercury from soil amended with municipal sewage sludge. Environ Sci Technol 1997;31:2085-2091.
8. Carpi A, Lindberg SE. Application of a teflon(TM) dynamic flux chamber for quantifying soil mercury flux: tests and results over background soil. Atmos Environ 1998;32:873-882.
9. Choi H-D, Sharac TJ, Holsen TM. Mercury deposition in the Adirondacks: a comparison between precipitation and throughfall. Atmos Environ 2008;42:1818-1827.
10. Cobbett FD, Steffen A, Lawson G, Van Heyst BJ. GEM fluxes and atmospheric mercury concentrations (GEM, RGM and Hgp) in the Canadian Arctic at Alert, Nunavut, Canada (February-June 2005). Atmos Environ 2007;41:6527-6543.
11. Cobbett FD, Van Heyst BJ. Measurements of GEM fluxes and atmospheric mercury concentrations (GEM, RGM and Hgp) from an agricultural field amended with biosolids in Southern Ont., Canada (October 2004-November 2004). Atmos Environ 2007;41:2270-2282.
12. Cobos DR, Baker JM, Nater EA. Conditional sampling for measuring mercury vapor fluxes. Atmos Environ 2002;36:4309-4321.
13. Ebinghaus R, Jennings SG, Schroeder WH, Berg T, Donaghy T, Guentzel J, et al. International field intercomparison measurements of atmospheric mercury species at Mace Head, Ireland. Atmos Environ 1999;33:3063-3073.
14. Eckley CS, Branfireun B. Gaseous mercury emissions from urban surfaces: controls and spatiotemporal trends. Appl Geochem 2008;23:369-383.
15. Eckley CS, Gustin M, Lin CJ, Li X, Miller MB. The influence of dynamic chamber design and operating parameters on calculated surface-to-air mercury fluxes. Atmos Environ 2010;44:194-203.
16. Eckley CS, Gustin M, Miller MB, Marsik F. Measurement of surface mercury fluxes at active industrial gold mines in Nevada (USA). Sci Total Environ 2011;409:514-522.
17. Edwards GC, Rasmussen PE, Schroeder WH, Kemp RJ, Dias GM, Fitzgerald-Hubble CR, et al. Sources of variability in mercury flux measurements. J Geophys Res 2001;106:5421-5435.
18. Engle MA, Gustin MS, Goff F, Counce DA, Janik CJ, Bergfeld D, et al. Atmospheric mercury emissions from substrates and fumaroles associated with three hydrothermal systems in the western United States. J Geophys Res 2006a;111:D17304.
19. Engle MA, Gustin MS, Johnson DW, Murphy JF, Miller WW, Walker RF, et al. Mercury distribution in two Sierran forest and one desert sagebrush steppe ecosystems and the effects of fire. Sci Total Environ 2006b;367:222-233.
20. Engle MA, Gustin MS, Lindberg SE, Gertler AW, Ariya PA. The influence of ozone on atmospheric emissions of gaseous elemental mercury and reactive gaseous mercury from substrates. Atmos Environ 2005;39:7506-7517.
21. Engle MA, Gustin MS, Zhang H. Quantifying natural source mercury emissions from the Ivanhoe Mining District, north-central Nevada, USA. Atmos Environ 2001;35:3987-3997.
22. Engle MA, Tate MT, Krabbenhoft DP, Kolker A, Olson ML, Edgerton ES, et al. Characterization and cycling of atmospheric mercury along the central US Gulf Coast. Appl Geochem 2008;23:419-437.
23. Ericksen JA, Gustin MS, Lindberg SE, Olund SD, Krabbenhoft DP. Assessing the potential for re-emission of mercury deposited in precipitation from arid soils using a stable isotope. Environ Sci Technol 2005;39:8001-8007.
24. Ericksen JA, Gustin MS, Schorran DE, Johnson DW, Lindberg SE, Coleman JS. Accumulation of atmospheric mercury in forest foliage. Atmos Environ 2003;37:1613-1622.
25. Ericksen JA, Gustin MS, Xin M, Weisberg PJ, Fernandez GCJ. Air-soil exchange of mercury from background soils in the United States. Sci Total Environ 2006;366:851-863.
26. Fang SC. Sorption and transformation of mercury vapor by dry soil. Environ Sci Technol 1978;12:285-288.
27. Fay L, Gustin M. Assessing the influence of different atmospheric and soil mercury concentrations on foliar mercury concentrations in a controlled environment. Water Air Soil Pollut 2007b;181:373-384.
28. Fay L, Gustin MS. Investigation of mercury accumulation in cattails growing in constructed wetland mesocosms. Wetlands 2007a;27:1056-1065.
29. Ferrara R, Maserti BE, Andersson M, Edner H, Ragnarson P, Svanberg S. Mercury degassing rate from mineralized areas in the mediterranean basin. Water Air Soil Pollut 1997;93:59-66.
30. Frescholtz TF, Gustin MS, Schorran DE, Fernandez GCJ. Assessing the source of mercury in foliar tissue of quaking aspen. Environ Toxicol Chem 2003;22:2114-2119.
31. Fritsche J, Obrist D, Zeeman MJ, Conen F, Eugster W, Alewell C. Elemental mercury fluxes over a sub-alpine grassland determined with two micrometeorological methods. Atmos Environ 2008;42:2922-2933.
32. Giglini AD. Reactive gaseous mercury concentrations and mercury flux from natural, anthropogenic, and background settings in Northwestern Nevada. Reno (NV): Natural Resources & Environmental Science. Master of Science in Environmental Science and Health, University of Nevada-Reno; 2003. p 99.
33. Gillis A, Miller DR. Some potential errors in the measurement of mercury gas exchange at the soil surface using a dynamic flux chamber. Sci Total Environ 2000;260:181-189.
34. Graydon JA, St. Louis VL, Hintelmann H, Lindberg SE, Sandilands KA, Rudd JWM, et al. Long-term wet and dry deposition of total and methyl mercury in the remote boreal ecoregion of Canada. Environ Sci Technol 2008;42:8345-8351.
35. Graydon JA, St. Louis VL, Hintelmann H, Lindberg SE, Sandilands KA, Rudd JWM, et al. Investigation of uptake and retention of atmospheric Hg(II) by Boreal forest plants using stable Hg isotopes. Environ Sci Technol 2009;43:4960-4966.
36. Graydon JA, St. Louis VL, Lindberg SE, Hintelmann H, Krabbenhoft DP. Investigation of mercury exchange between forest canopy vegetation and the atmosphere using a new dynamic chamber. Environ Sci Technol 2006;40:4680-4688.
37. Grigal DF. Mercury sequestration in forests and peatlands: a review. J Environ Qual 2003;32:393-405.
38. Grönlund R, Edner H, Svanberg S, Kotnik J, Horvat M. Mercury emissions from the Idrija mercury mine measured by differential absorption lidar techniques and a point monitoring absorption spectrometer. Atmos Environ 2005;39:4067-4074.
39. Gustin MS. Are mercury emissions from geologic sources significant? A status report. Sci Total Environ 2003;304:153-167.
40. Gustin MS, Engle M, Ericksen J, Lyman S, Stamenkovic J, Xin M. Mercury exchange between the atmosphere and low mercury containing substrates. Appl Geochem 2006;21:1913-1923.
41. Gustin MS, Ericksen J, Fernandez GC. Determination of the potential for release of mercury from combustion product amended soils, part 1-simulations of beneficial use. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 2008a;58:673-683.
42. Gustin MS, Ericksen JA, Schorran DE, Johnson DW, Lindberg SE, Coleman JS. Application of controlled mesocosms for understanding mercury air-soil-plant exchange. Environ Sci Technol 2004;38:6044-6050.
43. Gustin M, Jaffe D. Reducing the uncertainty in measurement and understanding of mercury in the atmosphere. Environ Sci Technol 2010;44:2222-2227.
44. Gustin M, Ladwig K. Laboratory investigation of Hg release from flue gas desulfurization products. Environ Sci Technol 2010;44:4012-4018.
45. Gustin MS, Lindberg SE. Terrestrial mercury fluxes, is the net exchange up, down, or neither? In: Pirrone N, Mahaffey KR, editors. Dynamics of mercury pollution on regional and global scales. Volume 1, Atmospheric processes and human exposures around the world. New York: Springer Science+Business Media, LLC; 2006. p 744.
46. Gustin MS, Lindberg S, Marsik F, Casimir A, Ebinghaus R, Edwards G, et al. Nevada STORMS project: measurement of mercury emissions from naturally enriched surfaces. J Geophys Res 1999;104:21831-21844.
47. Gustin MS, Lindberg SE, Weisberg PJ. An update on the natural sources and sinks of atmospheric mercury. Appl Geochem 2008b;23:482-493.
48. Gustin M, Stamenkovic J. Effect of watering and soil moisture on mercury emissions from soils. Biogeochemistry 2005;76:215-232.
49. Gustin MS, Taylor GE, Leonard Jr TL. Atmospheric mercury concentrations above mercury contaminated mill tailings in the Carson River Drainage Basin, NV. Water Air Soil Pollut 1995;80:217-220.
50. Hans Wedepohl K. The composition of the continental crust. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 1995;59:1217-1232.
51. Harris RC, Rudd JWM, Amyot M, Babiarz CL, Beaty KG, Blanchfield PJ, et al. Wholeecosystem study shows rapis fish-mercury response to changes in mercury deposition. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2007;104:16586-16591.
52. Hartman JS, Weisberg PJ, Pillai R, Ericksen JA, Kuiken T, Lindberg SE, et al. Application of a rule-based model to estimate mercury exchange for three background biomes in the continental United States. Environ Sci Technol 2009;43:4989-4994.
53. Hintelmann H, Harris R, Heyes A, Hurley JP, Kelly CA, Krabbenhoft DP, et al. Reactivity and mobility of new and old mercury deposition in a Boreal forest ecosystem during the first year of the METAALICUS study. Environ Sci Technol 2002;36:5034-5040.
54. Johnson DW, Lindberg SE. The biogeochemical cycling of Hg in forests: alternative methods for quantifying total deposition and soil emission. Water Air Soil Pollut 1995;80:1069-1077.
55. Keeler G, Glinsorn G, Pirrone N. Particulate mercury in the atmosphere: its significance, transport, transformation and sources. Water Air Soil Pollut 1995;80:159-168.
56. Kotnik J, Horvat M, Dizdarevic T. Current and past mercury distribution in air over the Idrija Hg mine region, Slovenia. Atmos Environ 2005;39:7570-7579.
57. Kuiken T, Gustin M, Zhang H, Lindberg S, Sedinger B. Mercury emission from terrestrial background surfaces in the eastern USA. II: air/surface exchange of mercury within forests from South Carolina to New England. Appl Geochem 2008a;23:356-368.
58. Kuiken T, Zhang H, Gustin M, Lindberg S. Mercury emission from terrestrial background surfaces in the eastern USA. part I: air/surface exchange of mercury within a southeastern deciduous forest (Tennessee) over one year. Appl Geochem 2008b;23:345-355.
59. Lalonde JD, Poulain AJ, Amyot M. The role of mercury redox reactions in snow on snow-to-air mercury transfer. Environ Sci Technol 2001;36:174-178.
60. Lamborg CH, Fitzgerald WF, Vandal GM, Rolfhus KR. Atmospheric mercury in northern Wisconsin, Sources and species. Water Air Soil Pollut 1995;80:189-198.
61. Landa ER. The retention of metallic mercury vapor by soils. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 1978;42:1407-1411.
62. Landis MS, Stevens RK, Schaedlich F, Prestbo EM. Development and characterization of an annular denuder methodology for the measurement of divalent inorganic reactive gaseous mercury in ambient air. Environ Sci Technol 2002;36:3000-3009.
63. Lin CJ, Gustin MS, Singhasuk P, Eckley C, Miller M. Measurement-based models for estimating mercury flux from soils. Environ Sci Technol 2010;44:8522-8588.
64. Lin CJ, Pehkonen SO. Aqueous phase reactions of mercury with free radicals and chlorine: implications for atmospheric mercury chemistry. Chemosphere 1999;38:1253-1263.
65. Lin CJ, Pongprueksa P, Lindberg SE, Pehkonen SO, Byun D, Jang C. Scientific uncertainties in atmospheric mercury models I: model science evaluation. Atmos Environ 2006;40:2911-2928.
66. Lindberg S, Bullock R, Ebinghaus R, Engstrom D, Feng X, Fitzgerald W, et al. A synthesis of progress and uncertainties in attributing the sources of mercury in deposition. Ambio J Hum Environ 2009;36:19-33.
67. Lindberg SE, Dong W, Meyers T. Transpiration of gaseous elemental mercury through vegetation in a subtropical wetland in Florida. Atmos Environ 2002;36:5207-5219.
68. Lindberg SE, Hanson PJ, Meyers TP, Kim KH. Air/surface exchange of mercury vapor over forests-the need for a reassessment of continental biogenic emissions. Atmos Environ 1998;32:895-908.
69. Lindberg SE, Kim K-H, Meyers TP, Owens JG. Micrometeorological gradient approach for quantifying air/surface exchange of mercury vapor: tests over contaminated soils. Environ Sci Technol 1995;29:126-135.
70. Lindberg SE, Stratton WJ. Atmospheric mercury speciation: concentrations and behavior of reactive gaseous mercury in ambient air. Environ Sci Technol 1998;32:49-57.
71. Lindqvist O, Johansson K, Bringmark L, Timm B, Aastrup M, Andersson A, Hovsenius G, Håkanson L, Iverfeldt Å, Meili M. Mercury in the Swedish environment-recent research on causes, consequences and corrective methods. Water Air Soil Pollut 1991;55: xi-261.
72. Lyman SN, Gustin MS. Speciation of atmospheric mercury at two sites in northern Nevada, USA. Atmos Environ 2008;42:927-939.
73. Lyman SN, Gustin MS. Determinants of atmospheric mercury concentrations in Reno, Nevada, U.S.A. Sci Total Environ 2009;408:431-438.
74. Lyman SN, Gustin MS, Prestbo EM, Kilner PI, Edgerton E, Hartsell B. Testing and application of surrogate surfaces for understanding potential gaseous oxidized mercury dry deposition. Environ Sci Technol 2009;43:6235-6241.
75. Lyman SN, Gustin MS, Prestbo EM, Marsik FJ. Estimation of dry deposition of atmospheric mercury in Nevada by direct and indirect methods. Environ Sci Technol 2007;41:1970-1976.
76. Lyman SN, Jaffe DA, Gustin MS. Release of mercury halides from KCl denuders in the presence of ozone. Atmos Chem Phys 2010a;10:8197-8204.
77. Lyman SN, Jaffe DA, Gustin MS. Technical Note, Release of mercury halides from KCl denuders in the presence of ozone. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2010;10:8197-8204.
78. Marsik FJ, Keeler GJ, Landis MS. The dry-deposition of speciated mercury to the Florida Everglades: measurements and modeling. Atmos Environ 2007;41:136-149.
79. Mason RP, Sheu GR. Role of the ocean in the global mercury cycle. Global Biogeochem Cycles 2002;16:1093.
80. Miller MB. Characterization of mercury concentration, form, and air-surface exchange associated with the area surrounding and within two Nevada gold mines. Reno: Department of Natural Resources & Environmental Science, Master of Science in Hydrology, University of Nevada-Reno; 2010. p 141.
81. Millhollen AG, Gustin MS, Obrist D. Foliar mercury accumulation and exchange for three tree species. Environ Sci Technol 2006a;40:6001-6006.
82. Millhollen AG, Obrist D, Gustin MS. Mercury accumulation in grass and forb species as a function of atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations and mercury exposures in air and soil. Chemosphere 2006b;65:889-897.
83. Munthe J, Bishop K, Driscoll C, Graydon J, Hultberg H, Lindberg SE, et al. Inputoutput of Hg in forested catchments in Europe and North America. Mater Geoenviron 2004;51:1243-1246.
84. Nacht DM, Gustin MS, Engle MA, Zehner RE, Giglini AD. Atmospheric mercury emissions and speciation at the sulphur bank mercury mine superfund site, Northern California. Environ Sci Technol 2004;38:1977-1983.
85. NADP, 2011, National Atmospheric Deposition Program, http://nadp.sws.uiuc.edu/ site visited 8-27-2011.
86. Nelson SJ, Johnson KB, Weathers KC, Loftin CS, Fernandez IJ, Kahl JS, et al. A comparison of winter mercury accumulation at forested and no-canopy sites measured with different snow sampling techniques. Appl Geochem 2008;23:384-398.
87. NRC. Global sources of local pollution: an assessment of long-range transport of key air pollutants to and from the United States. Washington (DC): The National Academies Press: 2010.
88. Obrist D, Faïn X, Berger C. Gaseous elemental mercury emissions and CO2 respiration rates in terrestrial soils under controlled aerobic and anaerobic laboratory conditions. Sci Total Environ 2010;408:1691-1700.
89. Ohio Lumex Co. 2010. Portable mercury analyzer information. Available at www.ohiolumex.com. Twinsburg (OH). 2006 pp. Pacyna EG, Pacyna JM, Steenhuisen F, Wilson S. Global anthropogenic mercury emission inventory for 2000. Atmos Environ 2006;40:4048-4063.
90. Peterson C, Gustin M, Lyman S. Atmospheric mercury concentrations and speciation measured from 2004 to 2007 in Reno, Nevada, USA. Atmos Environ 2009;43:4646-4654.
91. Poissant L, Pilote M, Constant P, Beauvais C, Zhang HH, Xu X. Mercury gas exchanges over selected bare soil and flooded sites in the bay St. François wetlands (Québec, Canada). Atmos Environ 2004;38:4205-4214.
92. Prestbo EM, Gay DA. Wet deposition of mercury in the U.S. and Canada, 1996-2005: results and analysis of the NADP mercury deposition network (MDN). Atmos Environ 2009;43:4223-4233.
93. Rasmussen PE. Current methods of estimating atmospheric mercury fluxes in remote areas. Environ Sci Technol 1994;28:2233-2241.
94. Rasmussen PE, Edwards G, Schroeder W, Ausma S, Steffen A, Kemp J, et al. Measurement of gaseous mercury fluxes in the terrestrial environment. In: Parsons MB, Percival JB, editors. Mercury, sources, measurements, cycles and effects. Halifax: Mineralogical Association of Canada; 2005. p 123-138.
95. Rasmussen P, Mierle G, Nriagu J. The analysis of vegetation for total mercury. Water Air Soil Pollut 1991;56:379-390.
96. Rea AW, Lindberg SE, Keeler GJ. Assessment of dry deposition and foliar leaching of mercury and selected trace elements based on washed foliar and surrogate surfaces. Environ Sci Technol 2000;34:2418-2425.
97. Rytuba JJ. Geogenic and mining sources of mercury to the environment. In Parsons MB, Percival JB, editors. Mercury, sources, measurements, cycles, and effects. Halifax: Mineralogical Association of Canada; 2005. p 21-36.
98. Sakata M, Marumoto K. Wet and dry deposition fluxes of mercury in Japan. Atmos Environ 2005;39:3139-3146.
99. Schluter K. Review: evaporation of mercury from soils. An integration and synthesis of current knowledge. Environ Geol 2000;39:249-271.
100. Selin NE. Global biogeochemical cycling of mercury: a review. Annu Rev Environ Resour 2009;34:43-63.
101. Selin NE, Jacob DJ. Seasonal and spatial patterns of mercury wet deposition in the United States: constraints on the contribution from North American anthropogenic sources. Atmos Environ 2008;42:5193-5204.
102. Selin NE, Jacob DJ, Yantosca RM, Strode S, Jaeglé L, Sunderland EM. Global 3-D land-ocean-atmosphere model for mercury, present-day versus preindustrial cycles and anthropogenic enrichment factors for deposition. Global Biogeochem Cycles 2008;22:GB2011.
103. Skov H, Brooks SB, Goodsite ME, Lindberg SE, Meyers TP, Landis MS, et al. Fluxes of reactive gaseous mercury measured with a newly developed method using relaxed eddy accumulation. Atmos Environ 2006;40:5452-5463.
104. Song X, Van Heyst B. Volatilization of mercury from soils in response to simulated precipitation. Atmos Environ 2005;39:7494-7505.
105. Stamenkovic J, Gustin MS. Evaluation of use of EcoCELL technology for quantifying total gaseous mercury fluxes over background substrates. Atmos Environ 2007;41:3702-3712.
106. Stamenkovic J, Gustin MS. Nonstomatal versus stomatal uptake of atmospheric mercury. Environ Sci Technol 2009;43:1367-1372.
107. Stamenkovic J, Gustin MS, Arnone Iii JA, Johnson DW, Larsen JD, Verburg PSJ. Atmospheric mercury exchange with a tallgrass prairie ecosystem housed in mesocosms. Sci Total Environ 2008;406:227-238.
108. Taylor JGE, Leonard TL, Fernandez GCJ, Gustin MS. Mercury and plants in contaminated soils: 2. Environmental and physiological factors governing mercury flux to the atmosphere. Environ Toxicol Chem 1998;17:2072.
109. Tekran Corporation. 2010. Available at www.tekran.com (last accessed, Sep 2010). Temme C, Einax W Jr, Ebinghaus R, Schroeder WH. Measurements of atmospheric mercury species at a coastal site in the Antarctic and over the south Atlantic Ocean during polar summer. Environ Sci Technol 2002;37:22-31.
110. Valente RJ, Shea C, Lynn Humes K, Tanner RL. Atmospheric mercury in the Great Smoky Mountains compared to regional and global levels. Atmos Environ 2007;41:1861-1873.
111. Wallschläger D, Turner RR, London J, Ebinghaus R, Kock HH, Sommar J, et al. Factors affecting the measurement of mercury emissions from soils with flux chambers. J Geophys Res 1999;104:21859-21871.
112. Watras CJ, Morrison KA, Rubsam JL, Rodger B. Atmospheric mercury cycles in northern Wisconsin. Atmos Environ 2009;43:4070-4077.
113. Wesely ML. Parameterization of surface resistances to gaseous dry deposition in regionalscale numerical models. Atmos Environ 1989;23:1293-1304.
114. Wesely ML, Hicks BB. A review of the current status of knowledge on dry deposition. Atmos Environ 2000;34:2261-2282.
115. Wiedinmyer C, Friedli H. Mercury emission estimates from fires: an initial inventory for the United States. Environ Sci Technol 2007;41:8092-8098.
116. Wiener JG, Knights BC, Sandheinrich MB, Jeremiason JD, Brigham ME, Engstrom DR, et al. Mercury in soils, lakes, and fish in Voyageurs National Park (Minnesota): importance of atmospheric deposition and ecosystem factors. Environ Sci Technol 2006;40:6261-6268.
117. Xin M, Gustin M, Johnson D. Laboratory investigation of the potential for re-emission of atmospherically derived Hg from soils. Environ Sci Technol 2007;41:4946-4951.
118. Zhang H, Lindberg SE, Barnett MO, Vette AF, Gustin MS. Dynamic flux chamber measurement of gaseous mercury emission fluxes over soils. Part 1: simulation of gaseous mercury emissions from soils using a two-resistance exchange interface model. Atmos Environ 2002;36:835-846.
119. Zhang H, Lindberg SE, Kuiken T. Mysterious diel cycles of mercury emission from soils held in the dark at constant temperature. Atmos Environ 2008;42:5424-5433.
120. Zhang H, Lindberg SE, Marsik FJ, Keeler GJ. Mercury air/surface exchange kinetics of background soils of the Tahquamenon River watershed in the Michigan Upper Peninsula. Water Air Soil Pollut 2001;126:151-169.
121. Zhang HH, Poissant L, Xu X, Pilote M. Explorative and innovative dynamic flux bag method development and testing for mercury air-vegetation gas exchange fluxes. Atmos Environ 2005;39:7481-7493.
122. Zhang L, Wright LP, Blanchard P. A review of current knowledge concerning dry deposition of atmospheric mercury. Atmos Environ 2009;43:5853-5864.