Comparing sets of positive and negative arguments: Empirical assessment of seven qualitative rules

Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications

Volumn 141, Issue , 2006, Pages 16-20

  Bonnefon, Jean François ^a   Fargier, Hélène ^b  

^a CNRS   (France)

^b IRIT   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARDINALITIES; COMPUTER SCIENTISTS; EMPIRICAL ASSESSMENT; MATCHINGS; POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE ARGUMENTS;

EID: 84886023099     PISSN: 09226389     EISSN: 18798314     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. L. Amgoud, J. F. Bonnefon, and H. Prade, 'An argumentation-based approach for multiple criteria decision', in ECSQARU'05 - LNAI 3571, ed., L. Godo, Berlin, (2005). Springer Verlag.
2. S. Benferhat, C. Cayrol, D. Dubois, J. Lang, and H. Prade, 'Inconsistency management and prioritized syntax-based entailment', in IJCAI, pp. 640-647, (1993).
3. S. Benferhat, D. Dubois, S. Kaci, and H. Prade, 'Bipolar possibility theory in preference modeling: Representation, fusion and optimal solutions', International Journal on Information Fusion, (to appear).
4. A. Bröder, 'Assessing the empirical validity of the "Take-The-Best" heuristic as a model of human probabilistic inference', Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning. Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1332-1346, (2000).
5. J. T. Cacioppo and G. G. Berntson, 'Relationship between attitudes and evaluative space: A critical review, with emphasis on the separability of positive and negative substrates', Psychological Bulletin, 115, 401-423, (1994).
6. J. T. Cacioppo, W. L. Gardner, and G. G. Berntson, 'The affect system has parallel and integrative processing components: Form follows function', Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 839-855, (1999).
7. H. Fargier D. Dubois and H. Prade, 'Refinements of the maximin approach to decision-making in fuzzy environment', Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 81, 103-122, (1996).
8. D. Dubois and H. Fargier, 'On the qualitative comparison of sets of positive and negative affects', in ECSQARU'05 - LNAI 3571, ed., L. Godo, pp. 305-316, Berlin, (2005). Springer-Verlag.
9. H. Fargier and R. Sabbadin, 'Qualitative decision under uncertainty: Back to expected utility', in IJCAI, pp. 303-308, (2003).
10. G. Gigerenzer, and D. G. Goldstein, 'Reasoning the fast and frugal way: Models of bounded rationality', Psychological Review, 103, 650-669, (1996).
11. G. Gigerenzer, P. M. Todd, and the ABC group, Simple heuristics that make us smart, Oxford University Press, 1999.
12. S. Kaci and H. Prade, 'Bipolar goals. a possibilisitc logic characterization odf', in Proceedings of the ECAI'04 Workshop on local computation for logics and uncertainty, pp. 13-18, (2004).
13. B. R. Newell, and D. R. Shanks, 'Take-the-best or look at the rest? Factors influencing 'one-reason' decision making', Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning. Memory, and Cognition, 29, 53-65, (2003).
14. B. R. Newell, N. J. Weston, and D. R. Shanks, 'Empirical tests of a fast and frugal heuristic: Not everyone "takes-the-best"', Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 91, 82-96, (2003).
15. P. Slovic, M. Finucane, E. Peters, and D. G. MacGregor, 'Rational actors or rational fools? implications of the affect heuristic for behavioral economics', The Journal of Socio-Economics, 31, 329-342, (2002).
16. A. Wald, Statistical Decision Functions, Wiley, 1950.
17. N. Wilson, 'An order of magnitude calculus', in Proceedings UAI-95, pp. 548-555, San Francisco, CA, (1995).