Optimal design of ethanol supply chains considering carbon trading effects and multiple technologies for side-product exploitation

Environmental Technology (United Kingdom)

Volumn 34, Issue 13-14, 2013, Pages 2189-2199

  Giarola, S ^a,b   Bezzo, F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

^b IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

biogas; carbon trading; ethanol; multi objective optimization; supply chain

Indexed keywords

BIOETHANOL; BIOGAS; ETHANOL; GREENHOUSE GASES; LINEAR PROGRAMMING; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; SUPPLY CHAINS;

BIO-ETHANOL PRODUCTION; BIOETHANOL SUPPLY CHAINS; CARBON TRADING; EMISSION TRADING SYSTEMS; MIXED INTEGER LINEAR PROGRAMMING; MODELLING FRAMEWORK; MULTIPLE TECHNOLOGY; SPATIALLY EXPLICIT;

EMISSION CONTROL;

ALCOHOL; BIOETHANOL; BIOFUEL; BIOGAS; CARBON; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

BIOFUEL; BIOGAS; DEMAND-SIDE MANAGEMENT; EMISSIONS TRADING; ENERGY CROP; ETHANOL; GREENHOUSE GAS; POWER GENERATION;

ALCOHOL PRODUCTION; ANAEROBIC DIGESTION; ARTICLE; BIOMASS PRODUCTION; CARBON FOOTPRINT; ELECTRICITY; ENERGY CROP; ENERGY YIELD; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; EVOLUTION; FERTILIZATION; HARVEST; HEAT; LIFE CYCLE STAGE; SOCIOECONOMICS; SYSTEM ANALYSIS;

ITALY;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 84886021027     PISSN: 09593330     EISSN: 1479487X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09593330.2013.829111     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. EC. European Commission. Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources and amending and subsequently repealing Directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC., 2009
2. Petrou EC, Pappis CP. Biofuels: A survey on pros and cons. Energy Fuels. 2009;23:1055-1066
3. Solomon BD, Johnson NH. Valuing climate protection through willingness to pay for biomass ethanol. Ecological Econ. 2009;68:2137-2144
4. Kallrath J. Mixed integer optimisation in the chemical process industry: Experience, potential and future perspectives. Chem Eng Res Des. 2000;78:809-822
5. Guillén-Gonsálbez G, Grossmann IE. Optimal design and planning of sustainable chemical supply chains under uncertainty. AIChE J. 2009;55:99-121
6. Zamboni A, Bezzo F, Shah N. Spatially explicit static model for the strategic design of future bioethanol production systems. 2. Multi-objective environmental optimisation. Energy Fuels. 2009;23:5134-5143
7. Giarola S, Zamboni A, Bezzo F. Spatially explicit multiobjective optimisation for design and planning of hybrid first and second generation biorefineries. Comput Chem Eng. 2011;35:1782-1797
8. You F, Wang B. Life cycle optimization of biomass-Toliquid supply chains with distributed centralized processing networks. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2011;50:10102-10127
9. Mele FD, Kostin AM, Guillén-Gosálbez G, Jiménez L. Multiobjective model for more sustainable fuel supply chains. A case study of the sugar cane industry in Argentina. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2011;50:4939-4958
10. Zamboni A, Murphy RJ, Woods J, Bezzo F, Shah N. Biofuels carbon footprints: Whole-systems optimisation for GHG emissions reduction. Bioresour Technol. 2011;102: 7457-7465
11. Akgul O, Shah N, Papageorgiou LG. An optimisation framework for a hybrid first/second generation bioethanol supply chain. Comput Chem Eng. 2012;42:101-114
12. You F, Tao L, Graziano DJ, Snyder SW. Optimal design of sustainable cellulosic biofuel supply chains: Multiobjective optimization coupled with life cycle assessment and input-output analysis. AIChE J. 2012;58:1157-1180
13. Kostin AM, Guillén-Gosálbez G, Mele FD, Bagajewicz MJ, Jiménez L. Design and planning of infrastructures for bioethanol and sugar production under demand uncertainty. Chem Eng Res Des. 2012;90:359-376
14. Čuček L, KlemeŠJJ, Varbanov PS, Kravanja Z. Total footprints-based multi-criteria optimisation of regional biomass energy supply chains. Energy. 2012;44:135-145
15. Bernardi A, Giarola S, Bezzo F. Optimizing the economics and the carbon and water footprints of bioethanol supply chains. Biofuels Bioprod Bioref. 2012;6:656-672
16. Bernardi A, Giarola S, Bezzo F. Spatially explicit multiobjective optimization for the strategic design of first and second generation biorefineries including carbon and water footprints. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2013;52:7170-7180
17. Wang B, Gebreslassie BH, You F. Sustainable design and synthesis of hydrocarbon biorefinery via gasification pathway: Integrated life cycle assessment and technoeconomic analysis with multiobjective superstructure optimization. Comput Chem Eng. 2013;52:55-76
18. Gebreslassie BH, Slivinsky M, Wang B, You F. Life cycle optimization for sustainable design and operations of hydrocarbon biorefinery via fast pyrolysis, hydrotreating and hydrocracking. Comput Chem Eng. 2013;50:71-91
19. Martin M, Svensson N, Fonseca J, Eklund M. Quantifying the environmental performance of integrated bioethanol and biogas production. Renewable Energy (In Press, Corrected Proof. 2012) pp. 1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2012.09.058
20. Kemppainen K, Ranta L, Sipil E, Östman A, Vehmaanperä J, Puranen T, Langfelder K, Hannula J, Kallioinen A, Siika-Aho M, Sipil K, von Weymarn N. Ethanol and biogas production from waste fibre and fibre sludge-The FibreEtOH concept. Biomass Bioenergy. 2012;46: 60-69
21. Giarola S, Shah N, Bezzo F. A comprehensive approach to the design of ethanol supply chains including carbon trading effects. Bioresour Technol. 2012;107:175-185
22. ISO. ISO 14040:2006: Environmental management-life cycle assessment-principles and framework. Geneva: International Standards Organization; 2006
23. Zamboni A, Shah N, Bezzo F. Spatially explicit static model for the strategic design of future bioethanol production systems. 1. Cost minimization. Energy Fuels. 2009;23: 5121-5133
24. CONCAWE, EUCAR, JRC. Well-To-wheels analysis of future automotive fuels and powertrains in the European context: WELL-TO-TANK Report, Tech. Rep. WTT Report 07102008, Luxembourg: PublicationsOfficeof the European Union; 2008
25. Rickeard DJ, Punter G, Lariv JF, Edwards R, Mortimer ND, Horne R, et al. Well-To-wheel evaluation for production of ethanol from wheat. London: Low Carbon Vehicle Partnership (LCVP); 2004
26. Morey R, Tiffany D, Hatfield D. Biomass for electricity and process heat at ethanol plants. Appl Eng Agric. 2006;22: 723-728
27. Franceschin G, Zamboni A, Bezzo F, Bertucco A. Ethanol from corn: A technical and economical assessment based on different scenarios. Chem Eng Res Des. 2008;86:488-498
28. Jacques K, Lyons T, Kelsall D. The alcohol textbook. 4th ed. Nottingham: Nottingham University Press; 2003
29. Deublein D, Steinhauser A. Biogas from waste and renewable resources. An introduction. 2nd revised and expanded ed. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH; 2011
30. Wooley R, Ruth M, Sheehan J, Ibsen K, Majdeski H, Galvez A. Lignocellulosic biomass to ethanol process design and economics utilizing co-current acid prehydrolysis and enzymatic hydrolysis. Current and futuristic scenarios. Golden (CO): National Renewable Energy Laboratory; 1999.( Tech. Rep. NREL/TP-580-26157
31. Börjesson P, Berglund M. Environmental systems analysis of biogas systems-Part II: The environmental impact of replacing various reference systems. Biomass Bioenergy. 2007;31:326-344
32. Börjesson P, Berglund M. Environmental analysis of biogas systems. Lund: Lund University, Department of Technology and Society, Environmental and Energy Systems Studies; 2003. (Tech. Rep. Report no.45
33. Nielsen LH, Hjort-Gregersen K, Thygesen P, Christensen J. Socio-economic analysis of centralised biogas plants, Frederiksberg: Danish Research Institute of Food Economics, c/o University of South Denmark, 2002. (Tech. Rep. Report 10820
34. Timilsina GR, Shrestha A. How much hope should we have for biofuels? Energy. 2011;36:2055-2069
35. Bojarski A, Laìnez J, Espuña A, Puigjaner L. Incorporating environmental impacts and regulations in a holistic supply chains modelling: An LCA approach. Comput Chem Eng. 2009;33:1747-1759
36. Connecticut General Assembly (CGA). Summary of California's low carbon fuel standard, 2009 available at http://www.cga.ct.gov/2009/rpt/2009-R-0193.htm
37. Woods J, Brown G, Estrin A. Bioethanol greenhouse gas calculator: User's guide. London: Home Grown Cereals Authority; 2005
38. Meyer-Aurich A, Schattauer A, Hellebrand H, Klauss H, Plochl M, BergW. Impact of uncertainties on greenhouse gas mitigation potential of biogas production from agricultural resources. Renew Energy. 2012;37:277-284
39. Rosenthal R. GAMS-A users' guide, 2010
40. Ehrgott M. Multicriteria optimization. 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer; 2005
41. European Energy Exchange (EEX): Www.eex.com, 2013
42. Mizrach B. Integration of the global carbon markets. Energy Econ. 2012;34:335-349