Conceptual hierarchies matching: An approach based on discovery of implication rules between concepts

Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications

Volumn 141, Issue , 2006, Pages 357-361

  David, Jérôme ^a   Guillet, Fabrice ^a   Gras, Régis ^a   Briand, Henri ^a  

^a INSTITUT DE RECHERCHE EN COMMUNICATIONS ET CYBERNÉTIQUE DE NANTES   (France)

Author keywords

Association rules; Extensional matching; Implication intensity; Ontology matching; Term extraction

Indexed keywords

EXTRACTION; ONTOLOGY;

CONCEPTUAL HIERARCHY; EXTENSIONAL MATCHING; IMPLICATION INTENSITY; IMPLICATION RULES; MATCHINGS; ONTOLOGY MATCHING; SCHEMA MATCHING; SIMILARITY MEASURE; SYMMETRICS; TERM EXTRACTION;

ASSOCIATION RULES;

EID: 84885998901     PISSN: 09226389     EISSN: 18798314     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. R. Agrawal, T. Imielinski, and A. Swami, 'Mining association rules between sets of items in large databases', in the 1993 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data, pp. 207-216. ACM Press, (1993).
2. J. Blanchard, P. Kuntz, F. Guillet, and R. Gras, Implication intensity: from the basic statistical definition to the entropic version, chapter 28, 473-485, CRC Press, 2003.
3. S. Castano, V. De Antonellis, and S. De Capitani Di Vimercati, 'Global viewing of heterogeneous data sources', IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 13(2), (2001).
4. B. Daille, 'Conceptual structuring through term variations', in ACL 2003 Workshop on Multiword Expressions: Analysis, Acquisition and Treatment, eds., F. Bond, A. Korhonen, D. MacCarthy, and A. Villacicencio, pp. 9-16, (2003).
5. H.H. Do and E. Rahm, 'Coma - a system for flexible combination of schema matching approaches', in the International Conference on Very Large Data Bases (VLDB '02), pp. 610-621, (2002).
6. A. Doan, J. Madhavan, P. Domingos, and A. Halevy, 'Learning to map between ontologies on the semantic web', in The Eleventh International WWW Conference, pp. 662-673. ACM Press, (2002).
7. A. Doan, J. Madhavan, P. Domingos, and A. Halevy, Ontology Matching : a machine learning approach, 397-416, Springer-Velag, 2004.
8. F. Giunchiglia, P. Shvaiko, and M. Yatskevich, 'S-match: an algorithm and an implementation of semantic matching', in European Semantic Web Symposium, LNCS 3053, pp. 61-75, (2004).
9. R. Gras et al., L'implication statistique, une nouvelle méthode exploratoire de données, La pensée sauvage, 1996.
10. Y. Kalfoglou and M. Schorlemmer, 'Ontology mapping: the state of the art', Knowedge Engineering Review, 18(1), 1-31, (2003).
11. H. Liu. Montylingua: An end-to-end natural language processor with common sense, 2004.
12. J. Madhavan, P. A. Bernstein, and E. Rahm, 'Generic schema matching with cupid', in the International Conference on Very Large Data Bases (VLDB'01), pp. 49-58, (2001).
13. S. Melnik, H. Garcia-Molina, and E. Rahm, 'Similarity flooding: A versatile graph matching algorithm and its application to schema matching', in the 18th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE'02), pp. 117-128. IEEE Computer Society, (2002).
14. N. Noy and M. Musen, 'Anchor-prompt: Using non-local context for semantic matching', in the Workshop on Ontologies and Information Sharing at the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), pp. 63-70, (2001).
15. E. Rahm and P. A. Bernstein, 'A survey of approaches to automatic schema matching', The VLDB Journal, 10(4), 334-350, (2001).
16. P. Shvaiko and J. Euzenat, 'A survey of schema-based matching approaches', Journal on Data Semantics IV, 4(LNCS 3730), 146-171, (2005).
17. G. Stumme and A. Maedche, 'FCA-MERGE: Bottom-up merging of ontologies', in IJCAI, pp. 225-234, (2001).