Dual-standard reference values of left ventricular volumetric parameters by multidetector CT angiography

Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography

Volumn 7, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 234-240

  Mao, Song Shou ^a   Li, Dong ^a   Rosenthal, David G ^a   Cerilles, Michelle ^a   Zeb, Irfan ^a   Wu, Hao ^a   Flores, Ferdinand ^a   Gao, Yanlin ^a   Budoff, Matthew J ^a,b  

^a LOS ANGELES BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b HARBOR UCLA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Computed tomography angiography; Left ventricular ejection fraction; Left ventricular mass; Left ventricular papillary and trabecular muscles; Left ventricular volume; Multi detector row computed tomography

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; ENDOCARDIUM; EPICARDIUM; FEMALE; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE EJECTION FRACTION; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE MASS; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE VOLUME; HEART MUSCLE; HEART SIZE; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REFERENCE VALUE;

COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY ANGIOGRAPHY; LEFT VENTRICULAR EJECTION FRACTION; LEFT VENTRICULAR MASS; LEFT VENTRICULAR PAPILLARY AND TRABECULAR MUSCLES; LEFT VENTRICULAR VOLUME; MULTI-DETECTOR ROW COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY;

AGED; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEART VENTRICLES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PAPILLARY MUSCLES; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; REFERENCE STANDARDS; STROKE VOLUME; VENTRICULAR FUNCTION, LEFT;

EID: 84885933228     PISSN: 19345925     EISSN: 1876861X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcct.2013.08.001     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Devereux R., Wachtell K., Gerdts E., et al. Prognostic significance ofleft ventricular mass change during treatment of hypertension. JAMA 2004, 292:2350-2356.
2. Hammermeister K.E., DeRouen T.A., Dodge H.T. Variables predictive of survival in patients with coronary disease. Selection by univariate and multivariate analyses from the clinical, electrocardiographic, exercise, arteriographic, and quantitative angiographic evaluations. Circulation 1979, 59:421-430.
3. Liao Y., Cooper R.S., McGee D.L., Mensah G.A., Ghali J.K. The relative effects of left ventricular hypertrophy, coronary artery disease, and ventricular dysfunction on survival among black adults. JAMA 1995, 273:1592-1597.
4. Budoff M., Ahmadi N., Sarraf G., et al. Determination of left ventricular mass on cardiac computed tomographic angiography. Acad Radiol 2009, 16:726-732.
5. Dewey M., Mller M., Eddicks S., et al. Evaluation of global and regional left ventricular function with 16-slice computed tomography, biplane cineventriculography, and two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. JAm Coll Cardiol 2006, 48:2034-2044.
6. Sugeng L., Mor Avi V., Weinert L., et al. Quantitative assessment of left ventricular size and function: side-by-side comparison of real-time three-dimensional echocardiography and computed tomography with magnetic resonance reference. Circulation 2006, 114:654-661.
7. Yamamuro M., Tadamura E., Kubo S., et al. Cardiac functional analysis with multi-detector row CT and segmental reconstruction algorithm: comparison with echocardiography, SPECT, and MR imaging. Radiology 2005, 234:381-390.
8. Alfakih K., Plein S., Thiele H., Jones T., Ridgway J.P., Sivananthan M.U. Normal human left and right ventricular dimensions for MRI as assessed by turbo gradient echo and steady-state free precession imaging sequences. JMagn Reson Imaging 2003, 17:323-329.
9. Devereux R.B., Lutas E.M., Casale P.N., et al. Standardization of m-mode echocardiographic left ventricular anatomic measurements. JAm Coll Cardiol 1984, 4:1222-1230.
10. Gupta M., Hacioglu Y., Kadakia J., et al. Left ventricular volume:an optimal parameter to detect systolic dysfunctionon prospectively triggered 64-multidetector row computed tomography: another step towards reducing radiation exposure. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2011, 27:1015-1023.
11. Hudsmith L.E., Petersen S.E., Francis J.M., Robson M.D., Neubauer S. Normal human left and right ventricular and leftatrial dimensions using steady state free precession magnetic resonance imaging. JCardiovasc Magn Reson 2005, 7:775-782.
12. Lorenz C.H., Walker E.S., Morgan V.L., Klein S.S., Graham T.P. Normal human right and left ventricular mass, systolic function, and gender differences by cine magnetic resonance imaging. JCardiovasc Magn Reson 1999, 1:7-21.
13. Stolzmann P., Scheffel H., Leschka S., et al. Reference values forquantitative left ventricular and left atrial measurements in cardiac computed tomography. Eur Radiol 2008, 18:1625-1634.
14. Verdecchia P., Angeli F., Borgioni C., et al. Changes in cardiovascular risk by reduction of left ventricular mass in hypertension: a meta-analysis. Am J Hypertens 2003, 16:895-899.
15. Papavassiliu T., Kühl H., Schröder M., et al. Effect of endocardial trabeculae on left ventricular measurements and measurement reproducibility at cardiovascular MR imaging. Radiology 2005, 236:57-64.
16. van der Geest R.J., Buller V.G., Jansen E., et al. Comparison between manual and semiautomated analysis of left ventricular volume parameters from short-axis MR images. JComput Assist Tomogr 1997, 21:756-765.
17. Weinsaft J., Cham M., Janik M., et al. Left ventricular papillary muscles and trabeculae are significant determinants of cardiac MRI volumetric measurements: effects on clinical standards in patients with advanced systolic dysfunction. Int J Cardiol 2008, 126:359-365.
18. Kirschbaum S., Aben J.P., Baks T., et al. Accurate automatic papillary muscle identification for quantitative left ventricle mass measurements in cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Acad Radiol 2008, 15:1227-1233.
19. Vogel Claussen J., Finn J.P., Gomes A., et al. Left ventricular papillary muscle mass: relationship to left ventricular mass and volumes by magnetic resonance imaging. JComput Assist Tomogr 2006, 30:426-432.
20. Yamaoka O., Yabe T., Okada M., et al. Evaluation of left ventricular mass: comparison of ultrafast computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and contrast left ventriculography. Am Heart J 1993, 126:1372-1379.
21. Sievers B., Kirchberg S., Bakan A., Franken U., Trappe H.-J. Impact of papillary muscles in ventricular volume and ejection fraction assessment by cardiovascular magnetic resonance. JCardiovasc Magn Reson 2004, 6:9-16.
22. Doǧan H., Kroft L.J.M., Bax J., et al. MDCT assessment of right ventricular systolic function. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006, 186:S366-S370.
23. Juergens K., Seifarth H., Maintz D., et al. MDCT determination of volume and function of the left ventricle: are short-axis image reformations necessary?. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006, 186:S371-S378.
24. Chow B.J.W., Wells G., Chen L., et al. Prognostic value of 64-slice cardiac computed tomography severity of coronary artery disease, coronary atherosclerosis, and left ventricular ejection fraction. JAm Coll Cardiol 2010, 55:1017-1028.
25. Juergens K., Seifarth H., Range F., et al. Automated threshold-based 3D segmentation versus short-axis planimetry for assessment of global left ventricular function with dual-source MDCT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008, 190:308-314.
26. Jacquier A., Thuny F., Jop B., et al. Measurement of trabeculated left ventricular mass using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of left ventricular non-compaction. Eur Heart J 2010, 31:1098-1104.
27. Ahmadi N., Mao S.S., Hajsadeghi F., et al. Relation of subclinical left and right ventricular dysfunctions measured by computed tomography angiography with the severity ofcoronary artery disease. Coron Artery Dis 2011, 22:380-387.
28. Madaj P.M., Pagali S.R., Hamirani Y.S., et al. Coronary artery calcium and plaque association with left ventricular mass, assessed by multi-row detector computed tomography. Coron Artery Dis 2010, 21:428-434.
29. Mao S., Takasu J., Child J., Carson S., Oudiz R., Budoff M.J. Comparison of LV mass and volume measurements derived from electron beam tomography using cine imaging and angiographic imaging. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2003, 19:439-445.
30. Agatston A.S., Janowitz W.R., Hildner F.J., Zusmer N.R., Viamonte M., Detrano R. Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. JAm Coll Cardiol 1990, 15:827-832.
31. King D.L., Coffin Lel K., Maurer M.S. Noncompressibility of myocardium during systole with freehand three-dimensional echocardiography. JAm Soc Echocardiogr 2002, 15:1503-1506.
32. Shapiro E.P., Rogers W.J., Beyar R., et al. Determination of left ventricular mass by magnetic resonance imaging in hearts deformed by acute infarction. Circulation 1989, 79:706-711.
33. Lang R.M., Bierig M., Devereux R.B., et al. Recommendations for chamber quantification: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography's Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Chamber Quantification Writing Group, developed in conjunction with the European Association of Echocardiography, a branch of the European Society of Cardiology. JAm Soc Echocardiogr 2005, 18:1440-1463.
34. Ingels N.B., Ricci D.R., Daughters G.T., Aldersman E.L., Stinson E.B. Effects of heart rate augmentation on left ventricular volumes and cardiac output of the transplanted human heart. Circulation 1977, 56:II32-II37.
35. Park Y.J., Kim J.K., Lee J.W., et al. Automatic Tube Potential Selection with Tube Current Modulation (APSCM) in coronary CT angiography: comparison of image quality and radiation dose with conventional body mass index-based protocol. JCardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2012, 6:184-190.
36. Dey D., Nakazato R., Pimentel R., et al. Low radiation coronary calcium scoring by dual-source CT with tube current optimization based on patient body size. JCardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2012, 6:113-120.