Does nasal echolocation influence the modularity of the mammal skull?

Journal of Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 26, Issue 11, 2013, Pages 2520-2526

  Santana, S E ^a   Lofgren, S E ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Bats; Echolocation; Integration; Modularity; Rhinolophidae; Rhinolophus; Skull

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; BAT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CRANIUM; ECHOLOCATION; ECOMORPHOLOGY; GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION; MORPHOMETRY; PHYLOGENETICS;

MAMMALIA; RHINOLOPHIDAE; RHINOLOPHUS; VERTEBRATA;

ADAPTATION; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BAT; BATS; ECHOLOCATION; EVOLUTION; GEOGRAPHY; HISTOLOGY; INTEGRATION; MODULARITY; PHYLOGENY; PHYSIOLOGY; RHINOLOPHIDAE; RHINOLOPHUS; SKULL;

BATS; ECHOLOCATION; INTEGRATION; MODULARITY; RHINOLOPHIDAE; RHINOLOPHUS; SKULL;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; CHIROPTERA; ECHOLOCATION; GEOGRAPHY; PHYLOGENY; SKULL;

EID: 84885870640     PISSN: 1010061X     EISSN: 14209101     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/jeb.12235     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Abzhanov, A. 2010. Darwin's Galápagos finches in modern biology. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. B 365: 1001-1007.
2. Aldridge, H. & Rautenbach, I. 1987. Morphology, echolocation and resource partitioning in insectivorous bats. J. Anim. Ecol. 56: 763-778.
3. Armstrong, K.N. & Coles, R.B. 2007. Echolocation call frequency differences between geographic isolates of Rhinonicteris aurantia (Chiroptera: Hipposideridae): implications of nasal chamber size. J. Mammal. 88: 94-104.
4. Beldade, P.C., Koops, K. & Brakefield, P.M. 2002. Modularity, individuality, and evo-devo in butterfly wings. PNAS 99: 14262-14267.
5. Bogdanowicz, W., Fenton, M.B. & Daleszczyk, K. 1999. The relationships between echolocation calls, morphology and diet in insectivorous bats. J. Zool. 247: 381-393.
6. Cardini, A. & Elton, S. 2008. Does the skull carry a phylogenetic signal? Evolution and modularity in the guenons. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 93: 813-834.
7. Cheverud, J.M. 1996. Developmental integration and the evolution of pleiotropy. Am. Zool. 36: 44-50.
8. Clausen, P., Wroe, S., McHenry, C., Moreno, K. & Bourke, J. 2008. The vector of jaw muscle force as determined by computer-generated three dimensional simulation: a test of Greaves' model. J. Biomech. 41: 3184-3188.
9. Drake, A.G. & Klingenberg, C.P. 2010. Large scale diversification of skull shape in domestic dogs: disparity and modularity. Am. Nat. 175: 289-301.
10. Dumont, E.R., Dávalos, L.M., Goldberg, A., Santana, S.E., Rex, K. & Voigt, C.C. 2012. Morphological innovation, diversification and invasion of a new adaptive zone. Proc. Roy. Soc. B 279: 1797-1805.
11. Esteve-Altava, B., Marugán-Lobón, J.S., Botella, H. & Rasskin-Gutman, D. 2013. Structural constraints in the evolution of the tetrapod skull complexity: Williston's Law revisited using network models. Evol. Biol. 40: 209-219.
12. Goswami, A. 2006. Cranial modularity shifts during mammalian evolution. Am. Nat. 168: 270-280.
13. Goswami, A. 2007. Cranial modularity and sequence heterochrony in mammals. Evol. Develop. 9: 290-298.
14. Greaves, W.S. 2000. Location of the vector of jaw muscle force in mammals. J. Morphol. 243: 293-299.
15. Hulsey, C.D., León, F. & Rodiles-Hernández, R. 2006. Micro- and macroevolutionary decoupling of cichlid jaws: a test of Liem's key innovation hypothesis. Evolution 60: 2096-2109.
16. Jones, G. & Teeling, E.C. 2006. The evolution of echolocation in bats. Trends Ecol. Evol. 21: 149-156.
17. Jones, K.E., Purvis, A., MacLarnon, A.N.N., Bininda-Emonds, O.R.P. & Simmons, N.B. 2002. A phylogenetic supertree of the bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera). Biol. Reviews 77: 223-259.
18. Klingenberg, C.P. 2009. Morphometric integration and modularity in configurations of landmarks: tools for evaluating a priori hypotheses. Evol. Develop. 11: 405-421.
19. Klingenberg, C.P. 2011. MorphoJ: an integrated software package for geometric morphometrics. Mol. Ecol. Res. 11: 353-357.
20. Klingenberg, C.P. & Gidaszewski, N.A. 2010. Testing and quantifying phylogenetic signals and homoplasy in morphometric data. Syst. Biol. 59: 245-261.
21. Klingenberg, C.P. & Marugán-Lobón, J.S. 2013. Evolutionary covariation in geometric morphometric data: analyzing integration, modularity, and allometry in a phylogenetic context. Syst. Biol. 62: 591-610.
22. Klingenberg, C.P., Barluenga, M. & Meyer, A. 2002. Shape analysis of symmetric structures: quantifying variation among individuals and asymmetry. Evolution 56: 1909-1920.
23. Kolbe, J.J., Revell, L.J., Szekely, B., Brodie, E.D. III & Losos, J.B. 2011. Convergent evolution of phenotypic integration and its alignment with morphological diversification in Caribbean Anolis ecomorphs. Evolution 65: 3608-3624.
24. Mallarino, R., Grant, P.R., Grant, B.R., Herrel, A., Kuo, W.P. & Abzhanov, A. 2011. Two developmental modules establish 3D beak-shape variation in Darwin's finches. PNAS 108: 4057-4062.
25. Marroig, G. & Cheverud, J.M. 2007. A comparison of phenotypic variation and covariation patterns and the role of phylogeny, ecology, and ontogeny during cranial evolution of New World monkeys. Evolution 55: 2576-2600.
26. Marroig, G., Shirai, L.T., Porto, A., de Oliveira, F.B. & De Conto, V. 2009. The evolution of modularity in the mammalian skull II: evolutionary consequences. Evol. Biol. 36: 136-148.
27. Monteiro, L.R. & Nogueira, M.R. 2009. Adaptive radiations, ecological specialization, and the evolutionary integration of complex morphological structures. Evolution 64: 724-744.
28. Nowak, R.M. & Walker, E.P. 1994. Walker's Bats of the World. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
29. Odendaal, L.J. & Jacobs, D.S. 2011. Morphological correlates of echolocation frequency in the endemic Cape horseshoe bat, Rhinolophus capensis (Chiroptera: Rhinolophidae). J. Comp. Physiol. 197: 435-446.
30. Porto, A., de Oliveira, F.B., Shirai, L.T., De Conto, V. & Marroig, G. 2009. The evolution of modularity in the mammalian skull I: morphological integration patterns and magnitudes. Evol. Biol. 36: 118-135.
31. Revell, L.J. 2012. Phytools: an R package for phylogenetic comparative biology (and other things). Methods Ecol. Evol. 3: 217-223.
32. Robert, P. & Escoufier, Y. 1976. A unifying tool for linear multivariate statistical methods: the RV-coefficient. Appl. Stat. 25: 257-265.
33. Rohlf, F. 2005 Tps series. Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY.
34. Sanger, T.J., Mahler, D.L., Abzhanov, A. & Losos, J.B. 2012. Roles for modularity and constraint in the evolution of cranial diversity among anolis lizards. Evolution 66: 1525-1542.
35. Santana, S.E., Dumont, E.R. & Davis, J.L. 2010. Mechanics of bite force production and its relationship to diet in bats. Funct. Ecol. 24: 776-784.
36. Santana, S.E., Grosse, I.R. & Dumont, E.R. 2012. Dietary hardness, loading behavior, and the evolution of skull form in bats. Evolution 66: 2587-2598.
37. Schnitzler, H.U. & Kalko, E.K.V. 2001. Echolocation by insect-eating bats. Bioscience 51: 557-569.
38. Schwenk, W. & Wagner, G.P. 2004 The relativism of constraint. In: Phenotypic Integration: Studying the Ecology and Evolution of Complex Phenotypes (M. Pigliucci, K. Preston, eds), pp. 390-408. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
39. Stock, D.W. 2001. The genetic basis of modularity in the development and evolution of the vertebrate dentition. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. B 356: 1633-1653.
40. Stoffberg, S., Jacobs, D.S., Mackie, I.J. & Matthee, C.A. 2010. Molecular phylogenetics and historical biogeography of Rhinolophus bats. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 54: 1-9.
41. Tokita, M., Kiyoshi, T. & Armstrong, K.N. 2007. Evolution of craniofacial novelty in parrots through developmental modularity and heterochrony. Evol. Develop. 9: 590-601.
42. Williams, T.A. & Nagy, L.M. 2001. Developmental modularity and the evolutionary diversification of arthropod limbs. J. Exp. Zool. 291: 241-257.
43. Wilson, D.E. & Reeder, D.A.M. 2005. Mammal Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
44. Yang, A. 2001. Modularity, evolvability, and adaptive radiations: a comparison of the hemi-and holometabolous insects. Evol. Develop. 3: 59-72.
45. Zelditch, M., Swiderski, D., Sheets, D.H. & Fink, W. 2004. Geometric Morphometrics for Biologists. Elsevier Academic Press, San Diego, CA.