Constraining CO2 simulations by coupled modeling and inversion of electrical resistance and gas composition data

International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control

Volumn 18, Issue , 2013, Pages 510-522

  Doetsch, Joseph ^a,b   Kowalsky, Michael B ^a   Doughty, Christine ^a   Finsterle, Stefan ^a   Ajo Franklin, Jonathan B ^a   Carrigan, Charles R ^c   Yang, Xianjin ^c   Hovorka, Susan D ^d   Daley, Thomas M ^a  

^a LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^b AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

^c LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

Electrical resistance tomography (ERT); Geophysical monitoring; Hydrological model calibration

Indexed keywords

D REGION; ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY; ELECTRIC RESISTANCE; HYDROLOGY; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; TOMOGRAPHY; WELL TESTING;

ELECTRICAL RESISTANCE TOMOGRAPHY; ELECTRICAL RESISTANCES; GEOPHYSICAL MONITORING; HYDROLOGICAL MODEL CALIBRATIONS; HYDROLOGICAL MODELS; RESERVOIR BOUNDARY; STABILIZING EFFECTS; STRUCTURAL CONSTRAINTS;

CARBON DIOXIDE;

EID: 84885848446     PISSN: 17505836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2013.04.011     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. 2 plume using crosswell seismic tomography: Cranfield, MS. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 2013, 18:497-509.
2. 2 sequestration modelling. Pure and Applied Geophysics 2012, 169:1283-1292.
3. Archie G.E. The electrical resistivity log as an aid in determining some reservoir characteristics. Transactions of the American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical and Petroleum Engineers 1942, 146:54-62.
4. Benson S.M., Cook P.J., et al. Underground geological storage of carbon dioxide. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage 2005, Cambridge University Press, New York, United States. B. Metz, O. Davidson, H. Coninck, M. Loos, L. Meyer (Eds.).
5. 2 storage at Ketzin, Germany. Geophysics 2012, 77:B253-B267.
6. Butsch R., Brown A.L., Bryans B., Kolb C. The value of integration - lessons learned through comparing and contrasting monitoring technologies deployed at Cranfield. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control. 2013, 18:409-420.
7. 2 plume growth and movement at the SECARB Cranfield site. 8th Annual Conference on Carbon Capture & Sequestration 2009.
8. 2 movement in deep geologic reservoirs. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 2013, 18:401-408.
9. 2 injection with cross-hole electrical resistivity tomography. Exploration Geophysics 2006, 37:44-49.
10. Commer M., Kowalsky M.B., Finsterle S., Newman G.A. Advances in hydrogeophysical joint inversion. TOUGH Symposium 2012, http://esd.lbl.gov/files/research/projects/tough/events/symposia/toughsymposium12/Commer_Michael-Joint_Inversion.pdf.
11. Coscia I., Linde N., Greenhalgh S., Vogt T., Green A. Estimating traveltimes and groundwater flow patterns using 3D time-lapse crosshole ERT imaging of electrical resistivity fluctuations induced by infiltrating river water. Geophysics 2012, 77:E239-E250.
12. 2 intrusion and associated geochemical transformations in a shallow groundwater system using complex electrical methods. Environmental Science and Technology 2013, 47:314-321.
13. Daily W., Owen E. Cross-borehole resistivity tomography. Geophysics 1991, 56:1228-1235.
14. Daily W., Ramirez A. Electrical-resistance tomography during in-situ trichloroethylene remediation at the savanna river site. Pure and Applied Geophysics 1995, 33:239-249.
15. 2 plume with crosswell CASSM at the Frio-II brine pilot. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 2011, 5:1022-1030.
16. 2 in a brine aquifer. Environmental Geology 2008, 54:1657-1665.
17. 2 injection in a brine aquifer. Geophysics 2007, 72:A57-A61.
18. Doetsch J., Linde N., Binley A. Structural joint inversion of time-lapse crosshole ERT and GPR travel time data. Geophysical Research Letters 2010, 37(24):L24404.
19. Doetsch J., Linde N., Pessognelli M., Green A.G., Günther T. Constraining 3-D electrical resistance tomography with GPR reflection data for improved aquifer characterization. Pure and Applied Geophysics 2012, 78:68-76.
20. 2 injection at Cranfield, Mississippi: Investigation of methane and temperature effects. TOUGH Symposium 2012, http://esd.lbl.gov/files/research/projects/tough/events/symposia/toughsymposium12/Doughty_Christine-Cranfield.pdf.
21. Ellis R.G., Oldenburg D.W. Applied geophysical inversion. Geophysical Journal International 1994, 116:5-11.
22. Finsterle S. Parallelization of iTOUGH2 Using PVM 1998, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, Report LBNL-42261.
23. Finsterle S. iTOUGH2 Command Reference 1999, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, Report LBNL-40041.
24. Finsterle S. iTOUGH2 User's Guide 1999, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, Report LBNL-40040.
25. Finsterle S. iTOUGH2 Universal Optimization Using the PEST Protocol 2010, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, Report LBNL-3698E.
26. Finsterle S., Kowalsky M.B. Joint hydrological-geophysical inversion for soil structure identification. Vadose Zone Journal 2008, 7:287.
27. Finsterle S., Zhang Y. Solving iTOUGH2 simulation and optimization problems using the PEST protocol. Environmental Modelling & Software 2011, 26:959-968.
28. 2 sequestration experiment. Journal of Geophysical Research 2005, 110:B10203.
29. 2 SINK site: a concept integrating geophysics, geochemistry and microbiology. Energy Procedia 2009, 1(1):2251-2259.
30. Günther, T., 2004. Inversion methods and resolution analysis for the 2D/3D reconstruction of resistivity structures from DC measurements. TU Bergakademie Freiberg, available at http://webdoc.sub.gwdg.de/ebook/serien/aa/Freiberger_Diss_Online/259.pdf.
31. Günther T., Rücker C., Spitzer K. Three-dimensional modelling and inversion of dc resistivity data incorporating topography - II. Inversion. Geophysical Journal International 2006, 166:506-517.
32. Hinnell A.C., Ferré T.P.A., Vrugt J.A., Huisman J.A., Moysey S., Rings J., Kowalsky M.B. Improved extraction of hydrologic information from geophysical data through coupled hydrogeophysical inversion. Water Resources Research 2010, 46(4):W00D40.
33. 2 storage in saline formations: the Frio experiment. Environmental Geosciences 2006, 13:105-121.
34. 2 injection: year two results from SECARB project at Denbury's Cranfield, Mississippi, USA. Energy Procedia 2011, 4:3478-3485.
35. 2 sequestration at Cranfield, Mississippi, U.S.A. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 2013, 18:449-462.
36. Huisman J.A., Rings J., Vrugt J.A., Sorg J., Vereecken H. Hydraulic properties of a model dike from coupled Bayesian and multi-criteria hydrogeophysical inversion. Journal of Hydrology 2010, 380:62-73.
37. Kowalsky M.B., Finsterle S., Peterson J., Hubbard S., Rubin Y., Majer E., Ward A., Gee G. Estimation of field-scale soil hydraulic and dielectric parameters through joint inversion of GPR and hydrological data. Water Resources Research 2005, 41:W11425.
38. Kowalsky M.B., Gasperikova E., Finsterle S., Watson D., Baker G., Hubbard S.S. Coupled modeling of hydrogeochemical and electrical resistivity data for exploring the impact of recharge on subsurface contamination. Water Resources Research 2011, 47:W02509.
39. 2 mineralization. Chemical Geology 2012, 318-319:113-125.
40. 2 injection in a fluvial formation. Journal of Geophysical Research 2012, 117:B03208.
41. 2 sequestration site, Mississippi, U.S.A. Chemical Geology 2012, 291:269-277.
42. 2 injection site. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 2013, 18:361-374.
43. Luckner L., Van Genuchten M.T., Nielsen D.R. A consistent set of parametric models for the two-phase flow of immiscible fluids in the subsurface. Water Resources Research 1989, 25:2187-2193.
44. 2 in saline formations using resistivity measurements. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 2010, 4:209-216.
45. Oldenburg C.M., Moridis G.J., Spycher N., Pruess K. EOS7C Version 1.0: TOUGH2 Module for Carbon Dioxide or Nitrogen in Natural Gas (Methane) Reservoirs 2004, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA, Report LBNL-56589.
46. 2. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2006, 1480-1484.
47. Pruess K., Oldenburg C.M., Moridis G.J. TOUGH2 User's Guide Version 2 1999, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA, Report LBNL-43134.
48. Ramirez A., Daily W., Labrecque D., Owen E., Chesnut D. Monitoring an underground steam injection process using electrical-resistance tomography. Water Resources Research 1993, 29:73-87.
49. Ramirez A., Newmark R.L., Daily W.D. Monitoring carbon dioxide floods using electrical resistance tomography (ERT): sensitivity studies. Journal of Environment Engineering Geophysics 2003, 8:187-208.
50. Scheibe T.D., Chien Y.J. An evaluation of conditioning data for solute transport prediction. Ground Water 2003, 41:128-141.
51. Slater L., Binley A.M., Daily W., Johnson R. Cross-hole electrical imaging of a controlled saline tracer injection. Pure and Applied Geophysics 2000, 44:85-102.
52. Zhang K., Wu Y.S., Pruess K. User's Guide for TOUGH2-MP - A Massively Parallel Version of the TOUGH2 Code 2008, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, Report LBNL-315E.