Implementing the argument web

Communications of the ACM

Volumn 56, Issue 10, 2013, Pages 66-73

  Bex, Floris ^a   Lawrence, John ^b   Snaith, Mark ^b   Reed, Chris ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF DUNDEE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SOCIAL MEDIA;

COMPUTER APPLICATIONS;

COMPUTER SCIENCE;

EID: 84885765072     PISSN: 00010782     EISSN: 15577317     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1145/2500891     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., and Lassila, O. The Semantic Web. Scientific American 284, 5 (2001), 28-37.
2. Bex, R, Modgil, S., Prakken, H., and Reed, C. On logical reifications of the Argument Interchange Format. Journal of Logic and Computation, Aug. 2012; doi: 10.1093/logcorn/exs033
3. Bex, F. and Reed, C. Dialogue templates for automatic argument processing. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications 245 (2012), 366-377.
4. Bizer, C., Heath, T, and Berners-Lee, T Linked data: The story so far. International Journal on Semantic-Web and Information Systems 5, 3 (2009), 1-22.
5. Budzynska, K. and Reed, C. The structure of ad hominem dialogues. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications 245 (2012), 410-421.
6. Cheshevar, C, McGinnis, J., Modgil, S., Rahwan, I., Reed, C, Simari, G., South, M., Vreeswijk, G., and Willrnott, S. Towards an Argument Interchange Format. Knowledge Engineering Review 21, 4 (2009), 293-316.
7. De Liddo, A., Sandor, A., and Buckingham Shum, S. Contested collective intelligence: Rationale, technologies, and a human-machine annotation study. Computer Supported Cooperative Work 21, 4-5 (2012), 417-448.
8. de Moor, A.D. and Aakhus, M. Argumentation support: From technologies to tools. Commun. ACM 49, 3 (Mar. 2006), 93-98.
9. Dung, P.M. On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming, and n-person games. Artificial Intelligence 77, 2 (1995), 321-357.
10. Lawrence, J., Snaith, M., Bex, F.J., and Reed, C. Demonstration papers on the AIFdb, ArguBlogging, Arvina, and TOAST. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications 245 (2012), 511-516.
11. Okada, A., Buckingham Shum, S.J., and Sherborne, T., Eds. Knowledge Cartography: Software Tools and Mapping Techniques. Advanced Information and Knowledge Processing, Springer, London, 2008.
12. Pinkwart, N., Ashley, K., Lynch, C, and Aleven, V. Evaluating an intelligent tutoring system for making legal arguments with hypotheticals. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 19, 4 (2009), 401-424.
13. Rahwan, I. Mass argumentation and the Semantic Web. WebSemantics 6, 1 (2008), 29-37.
14. Rahwan, I., Zablith, F., and Reed, C. Laying the foundations for a World Wide Argument Web. Artificial Intelligence 171, 10-15 (2007), 897-921.
15. Reed, C, Bex, F., Lawrence, J., and Snaith, M. DEMO: The Argument Analysis Wall. In Proceedings of Digital Futures: The Third Annual Digital Economy All Hands Conference (Aberdeen, U.K., 2012).
16. Snaith, M. and Reed, C. TOAST: Online ASPIC+ implementation. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications 245 (2012), 509-510.
17. van Eemeren, F.H. and Grootendorst, R. A Systematic-Theory of Argumentation: The Pragma-Dialectical Approach, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., 2004.
18. Walton, D.N., Reed, C.A., and Macagno, F. Argumentation Schemes, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., 1995.
19. Yuan, T., Moore, D., Reed, C, Ravenscroft, A., and Maudet, N. Informal logic dialogue games in human-computer dialogue. Knowledge Engineering Review 26, 3 (2011), 159-174.