An integrated approach for generating arguments and rebuttals and understanding rejoinders

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 2109, Issue , 2001, Pages 84-94

  Zukerman, Ingrid ^a  

^a MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Argumentation; Bayesian networks; Discourse planning; Plan recognition

Indexed keywords

INTEGRATED CONTROL;

ARGUMENTATION; ARGUMENTATION SYSTEMS; BAYESIAN; GENERATION MECHANISM; INTEGRATED APPROACH; PLAN RECOGNITION; USER MODELING;

BAYESIAN NETWORKS;

EID: 84885761123     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-44566-8_9     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (10)

1. J. R. Anderson. The Architecture of Cognition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1983.
2. Sandra Carberry and Lynn Lambert. A process model for recognizing communicative acts and modeling negotiation subdialogues. Computational Linguistics, 25(1):1–53, 1999.
3. Eugene Charniak and Robert P. Goldman. A Bayesian model of plan recognition. Artificial Intelligence, 64(1):50–56, 1993.
4. Abigail Gertner, Cristina Conati, and Kurt VanLehn. Procedural help in Andes: Generating hints using a Bayesian network student model. In AAAI98 – Proceedings of the Fifteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 106–111, Madison, Wisconsin, 1998.
5. David Heckerman and Eric Horvitz. Inferring informational goals from free-text queries: A Bayesian approach. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pages 230–237, Madison, Wisconsin, 1998.
6. Nathalie Jitnah, Ingrid Zukerman, Richard McConachy, and Sarah George. Towards the generation of rebuttals in a Bayesian argumentation system. In Proceedings of the First International Natural Language Generation Conference, pages 39–46, Mitzpe Ramon, Israel, 2000.
7. Alex Quilici. Arguing about planning alternatives. In COLING-92 – Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Computational Linguistics, pages 906–910, Nantes, France, 1992.
8. Ingrid Zukerman, Nathalie Jitnah, Richard McConachy, and Sarah George. Recognizing intentions from rejoinders in a Bayesian interactive argumentation system. In PRICAI2000 – Proceedings of the Sixth Pacific Rim International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 252–263, Melbourne, Australia, 2000.
9. Ingrid Zukerman, Richard McConachy, and Kevin B. Korb. Bayesian reasoning in an abductive mechanism for argument generation and analysis. In AAAI98 – Proceedings of the Fifteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 833–838, Madison,Wisconsin, 1998.
10. Ingrid Zukerman, Richard McConachy, Kevin B. Korb, and Deborah A. Pickett. Exploratory interaction with a Bayesian argumentation system. In IJCAI99 – Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 1294–1299, Stockholm, Sweden, 1999.