Recognizing intentions from rejoinders in a Bayesian interactive argumentation system

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 1886 LNAI, Issue , 2000, Pages 252-263

  Zukerman, Ingrid ^a   Jitnah, Nathalie ^a   McConachy, Richard ^a   George, Sarah ^a  

^a MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

ARGUMENTATION SYSTEMS; BAYESIAN; USER'S INTENTIONS;

BAYESIAN NETWORKS;

EID: 84867811141     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-44533-1_28     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. J.R. Anderson. The Architecture of Cognition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1983.
2. Sandra Carberry and Lynn Lambert. A process model for recognizing communicative acts and modeling negotiation subdialogues. Computational Linguistics, 25(1):1 - 53, 1999.
3. Eugene Charniak and Robert P. Goldman. A Bayesian model of plan recognition. Artificial Intelligence, 64(1):50-56, 1993.
4. Margot Flowers, Rod McGuire, and Lawrence Birnbaum. Adversary arguments and the logic of personal attack. In Strategies for Natural Language Processing, pages 275-294. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey, 1982.
5. David Heckerman and Eric Horvitz. Inferring informational goals from free-text queries: A Bayesian approach. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pages 230-237, Madison, Wisconsin, 1998.
6. Nathalie Jitnah, Ingrid Zukerman, Richard McConachy, and Sarah George. Towards the generation of rebuttals in a Bayesian argumentation system. In Proceedings of the International Natural Language Generation Conference, Mitzpe Ramon, Israel, 2000.
7. R. McConachy, K. B. Korb, and I. Zukerman. Deciding what not to say: An attentional-probabilistic approach to argument presentation. In Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pages 669-674, Madison, Wisconsin, 1998.
8. Judea Pearl. Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Mateo, California, 1988.
9. Alex Quilici. Arguing about planning alternatives. In COLING-92 - Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Computational Linguistics, pages 906-910, Nantes, France, 1992.
10. A. Restificar, A. Syed, and S. McRoy. Arguer: Using argument schemas for argument detection and rebuttal in dialogs. In UM99 - Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on User Modeling, pages 315-317, Banff, Canada, 1999.
11. Ingrid Zukerman, Richard McConachy, and Kevin B. Korb. Bayesian reasoning in an ab-ductive mechanism for argument generation and analysis. In AAAI98 - Proceedings of the Fifteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 833-838, Madison, Wisconsin, 1998.
12. Ingrid Zukerman, Richard McConachy, Kevin B. Korb, and Deborah A. Pickett. Exploratory interaction with a Bayesian argumentation system. In IJCAI99 - Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 1294-1299, Stockholm, Sweden, 1999.