A comparative evaluation of cone beam CT and micro-CT on trabecular bone structures in the human mandible

Dentomaxillofacial Radiology

Volumn 42, Issue 8, 2013, Pages

  Van Dessel, J ^a   Huang, Y ^a,b   Depypere, M ^a   Rubira Bullen, I ^c   Maes, F ^a   Jacobs, R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b SICHUAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Bone architecture; Cone beam CT; Micro computed tomography; Quantitative bone morphometry

Indexed keywords

BONE DENSITY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; DEVICES; EDENTULOUSNESS; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; MANDIBLE; MICRO-COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PERIODONTIUM; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; RADIATION DOSE; RADIOGRAPHY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; ARTICLE; BONE ARCHITECTURE; EQUIPMENT; METHODOLOGY; QUANTITATIVE BONE MORPHOMETRY;

BONE DENSITY; CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; JAW, EDENTULOUS; MANDIBLE; PERIODONTIUM; RADIATION DOSAGE; SOFTWARE; X-RAY MICROTOMOGRAPHY;

BONE ARCHITECTURE; CONE BEAM CT; MICRO-COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; QUANTITATIVE BONE MORPHOMETRY;

EID: 84885672573     PISSN: 0250832X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.20130145     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Parfitt AM, Drezner MK, Glorieux FH, Kanis JA, Malluche H, Meunier PJ, et al. Bone histomorphometry: standardization of nomenclature, symbols, and units. Report of the ASBMR Histomorphomerty Nomenclature Committee. J BoneMiner Res 1997; 2: 595-610. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.5650020617
2. Parfitt AM, Mathews CH, Villanueva AR, Kleerekoper M, Frame B, Rao DS. Relationships between surface, volume, and thickness of iliac trabecular bone in aging and in osteoporosis. Implications for the microanatomic and cellular mechanisms of bone loss. J Clin Invest 1983; 72: 1396-1409. doi: 10.1172/JCI111096
3. Müller R, Van Campenhout H, Van Damme B, Van Der Perre G, Dequeker J, Hildebrand T, et al. Morphometric analysis of human bone biopsies: a quantitative structural comparison of histological sections and micro-computed tomography. Bone 1998; 23: 59-66.
4. Kothari M, Keaveny TM, Lin JC, Newitt DC, Genant HK, Majumdar S. Impact of spatial resolution on the prediction of trabecular architecture parameters. Bone 1998; 22: 437- 443.
5. Issever AS, Link TM, Kentenich M, Rogalla P, Burghardt AJ, Kazakia GJ, et al. Assessment of trabecular bone structure using MDCT: comparison of 64- and 320- slice CT using HR-pQCT as the reference standard. Eur Radiol 2010; 20: 458-468. doi: 10.1007/ s00330-009-1571-7
6. Maes F, Collignon A, Vandermeulen D, Marchal G, Suetens P. Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1997; 16: 187-198. doi: 10.1109/42.563664
7. Waarsing JH, Day JS, Weinans H. An improved segmentation method for in vivo microCT imaging. J Bone Miner Res 2004; 19: 1640-1650. doi: 10.1359/JBMR.040705
8. Bouxsein ML, Boyd SK, Christiansen BA, Guldberg RE, Jepsen KJ, Müller R. Guidelines for assessment of bone microstructure in rodents using micro-computed tomography. J Bone Miner Res 2010; 25: 1468-1486. doi: 10.1002/ jbmr.141
9. Kapadia RD, Stroup GB, Badger AM, Koller B, Levin JM, Coatney RW, et al. Applications of micro-CT and MR microscopy to study pre-clinical models of osteoporosis and osteoarthritis. Technol Health Care 1998; 6: 361-372.
10. Bonnet N, Laroch N, Vico L, Dolleans E, Courteix D, Benhamou CL. Assessment of trabecular bone microarchitecture by two different X-ray microcomputed tomographs: a comparative study of the rat distal tiba using Skyscan and Scanco devices. Med Phys 2009; 36: 1286-1297.
11. Chappard D, Retailleau-Gaborit N, Legrand E, Baslé MF, Audran M. Comparison insight bone measurements by histomorphometry and microCT. J Bone MinerRes 2005; 20: 1177-1184. doi: 10.1359/JBMR.050205
12. Sandborg M, Alm Carlsson G, Persliden J, Dance DR. Comparison of different materials for test phantoms in diagnostic radiology. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 1993; 49: 345-347.
13. Schulze R, Heil U, Gross D, Bruellmann DD, Dranischnikow E, Schwanecke U, et al. Artefacts in CBCT: a review. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2011; 40: 265-273. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/30642039
14. Ens S, Bruder R, Ulrici J, Hell E, Buzug TM. A validation framework for head-motion artifacts in dental cone-beam CT. In: World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, 7-12 September 2009; Munich, Germany. Munich, Germany: IFMBE Proceedings Volume 25/2; 2009.
15. Katsumata A, Hirukawa A, Noujeim M, Okumura S, Naitoh M, Fujishita M, et al. Image artifact in dental cone-beam CT. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2006; 101: 652-657. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.07.027
16. Pauwels R, Stamatakis H, Manousaridis G, Walker A, Michielsen K, Bosmans H, et al. Development and applicability of a quality control phantom for dental cone-beam CT. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2011; 12: 3478.
17. Kothari M, Keaveny TM, Lin JC, Newitt DC, Genant HK, Majumdar S. Impact of spatial resolution on the prediction of trabecular architecture parameters. Bone 1998; 22: 437-443.
18. Naitoh M, Aimiya H, Hirukawa A, Ariji E. Morphometric analysis of mandibular trabecular bone using cone beam computed tomography: an in vitro study. Int J OralMaxillofac Implants 2010; 25: 1093-1098.
19. Huang Y, Van Dessel J, Liang X, Depypere M, Zhong W, Ma G, et al. Effects of immediate and delayed loading on peri-implant trabecular structures: a cone beam CT evaluation. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res Apr 2013. Epub ahead of print. doi:10.1111/cid. 12063
20. Liu SM, Zhang ZY, Li JP, Liu DG, Ma XC. A study of trabecular bone structure in the mandibular condyle of healthy young people by cone beam computed tomography. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi 2007; 42: 357-360.
21. de Oliveira RC, Leles CR, Lindh C, Ribeiro-Rotta RF. Bone tissue microarchitectural characteristics at dental implant sites. Part 1: identification of clinical-related parameters. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012; 23: 981-986. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02243.x
22. Goldman LW. Principles of CT: radiation dose and image quality. J Nucl Med Technol 2007; 35: 213-225. doi: 10.2967/jnmt.106.037846