A partial volume effect correction tailored for 18F-FDG-PET oncological studies

BioMed Research International

Volumn 2013, Issue , 2013, Pages

  Gallivanone, F ^a   Canevari, C ^b   Gianolli, L ^b   Salvatore, C ^c   Della Rosa, P A ^a   Gilardi, M C ^a   Castiglioni, I ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF MOLECULAR BIOIMAGING AND PHYSIOLOGY   (Italy)

^b SAN RAFFAELE HOSPITAL   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MILANO BICOCCA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE F 18; RADIOPHARMACEUTICAL AGENT;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGING AND DISPLAY; IMAGING PHANTOM; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEASUREMENT; PARTIAL VOLUME EFFECT; PET SCANNER; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; RADIOACTIVITY; VALIDATION STUDY; CLINICAL TRIAL; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM; RADIOGRAPHY; STANDARD; VERY ELDERLY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; FEMALE; FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE F18; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASMS; POSITRON-EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; RADIOPHARMACEUTICALS;

EID: 84885659038     PISSN: 23146133     EISSN: 23146141     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1155/2013/780458     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Mankoff D. A., Eubank W. B., Current and future use of positron emission tomography (PET) in breast cancer. Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia 2006 11 2 125 136 2-s2.0-33846320032 10.1007/s10911-006-9019-z (Pubitemid 46111260)
2. Plathow C., Weber W. A., Tumor cell metabolism imaging. Journal of Nuclear Medicine 2008 49 6 43S 63S 2-s2.0-46749127817 10.2967/jnumed.107.045930 (Pubitemid 351948036)
3. Lapela M., Eigtved A., Jyrkkiö S., Grénman R., Kurki T., Lindholm P., Nuutinen J., Sutinen E., Solin O., Bjornskov I., Bretlau P., Friberg L., Holm S., Jensen M., Sand Hansen H., Minn H., Experience in qualitative and quantitative FDG PET in follow-up of patients with suspected recurrence from head and neck cancer. European Journal of Cancer 2000 36 7 858 867 2-s2.0-0034008966 10.1016/S0959-8049(00)00037-X (Pubitemid 30214135)
4. Rosen E. L., Eubank W. B., Mankoff D. A., FDG PET, PET/CT, and breast cancer imaging. Radiographics 2007 27 S215 S229 2-s2.0-36148931885 10.1148/rg.27si075517
5. 18FDG PET scanning in oncology. British Journal of Cancer 2008 98 10 1597 1601 2-s2.0-43649094992 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604330 (Pubitemid 351684676)
6. 18F-FDG-PET/CT. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 2008 35 11 2000 2008 2-s2.0-53649097238 10.1007/s00259-008-0876-0
7. Hoshikawa H., Mitani T., Nishiyama Y., Yamamoto Y., Ohkawa M., Mori N., Evaluation of the therapeutic effects and recurrence for head and neck cancer after chemoradiotherapy by FDG-PET. Auris Nasus Larynx 2009 36 2 192 198 2-s2.0-59849083521 10.1016/j.anl.2008.05.009
8. 18F-FDG PET as an indicator of therapeutic response in patients in national cancer institute trials. Journal of Nuclear Medicine 2006 47 6 1059 1066 2-s2.0-33746036112 (Pubitemid 46939960)
9. Stahl A., Ott K., Schwaiger M., Weber W. A., Comparison of different SUV-based methods for monitoring cytotoxic therapy with FDG PET. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 2004 31 11 1471 1479 2-s2.0-9944264177 10.1007/s00259-004-1626-6 (Pubitemid 39592766)
10. 18F] fluorodeoxyglucose uptake and prognostic parameters in breast cancer. British Journal of Surgery 2009 96 2 166 170 2-s2.0-60049099374 10.1002/bjs.6459
11. 18F]FDG-PET for assessment of histopathological response in oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma after radiochemotherapy. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 2009 36 5 735 744 2-s2.0-64649094846 10.1007/s00259-008-1011- y
12. 18F]FDG-PET predicts complete pathological response of breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 2007 34 12 1915 1924 2-s2.0-36749069360 10.1007/s00259-007-0459-5 (Pubitemid 350212117)
13. 18F-FDG PET: histologic and immunohistochemical tissue analysis. Journal of Nuclear Medicine 2001 42 1 9 16 2-s2.0-0035132776 (Pubitemid 32104770)
14. 18F]fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in the human brain. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism 1991 11 2 A17 A25 2-s2.0-0026016733
15. Kessler R. M., Ellis J. R. Jr., Eden M., Analysis of emission tomographic scan data: Limitations imposed by resolution and background. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography 1984 8 3 514 522 2-s2.0-0021261066 (Pubitemid 14122897)
16. Soret M., Bacharach S. L., Buvat I., Partial-volume effect in PET tumor imaging. Journal of Nuclear Medicine 2007 48 6 932 945 2-s2.0-34250315240 10.2967/jnumed.106.035774 (Pubitemid 46909922)
17. Hoffman E. J., Huang S. C., Phelps M. E., Quantitation in positron emission computer tomography: effect of object size. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography 1978 3 3 299 308 2-s2.0-0018367149 (Pubitemid 9176236)
18. Rousset O. G., Ma Y., Evans A. C., Correction for partial volume effects in PET: principle and validation. Journal of Nuclear Medicine 1998 39 5 904 911 2-s2.0-0031955835 (Pubitemid 28216748)
19. Müller-Gärtner H. W., Links J. M., Prince J. L., Bryan R. N., McVeigh E., Leal J. P., Davatzikos C., Frost J. J., Measurement of radiotracer concentration in brain gray matter using positron emission tomography: MRI-based correction for partial volume effects. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism 1992 12 4 571 583 2-s2.0-0026700928
20. Boussion N., Hatt M., Lamare F., Bizais Y., Turzo A., Cheze-Le Rest C., Visvikis D., A multiresolution image based approach for correction of partial volume effects in emission tomography. Physics in Medicine and Biology 2006 51 7 1857 1876 2-s2.0-33645302410 10.1088/0031-9155/51/7/016
21. Vesselle H., Schmidt R. A., Pugsley J. M., Li M., Kohlmyer S. G., Vallieres E., Wood D. E., Lung cancer proliferation correlates with [F-18]fluorodeoxyglucose uptake by positron emission tomography. Clinical Cancer Research 2000 6 10 3837 3844 2-s2.0-0033754806
22. van Baardwijk A., Baumert B. G., Bosmans G., van Kroonenburgh M., Stroobants S., Gregoire V., Lambin P., De Ruysscher D., The current status of FDG-PET in tumour volume definition in radiotherapy treatment planning. Cancer Treatment Reviews 2006 32 4 245 260 2-s2.0-33745535722 10.1016/j.ctrv.2006.02. 002 (Pubitemid 44502002)
23. Yu J., Li X., Xing L., Mu D., Fu Z., Sun X., Sun X., Yang G., Zhang B., Sun X., Ling C. C., Comparison of tumor volumes as determined by pathologic examination and FDG-PET/CT images of non-small-cell lung cancer: a pilot study. International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics 2009 75 5 1468 1474 2-s2.0-70350578388 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.01.019
24. Weber W. A., Ziegler S. I., Thödtmann R., Hanauske A.-R., Schwaiger M., Reproducibility of metabolic measurements in malignant tumors using FDG PET. Journal of Nuclear Medicine 1999 40 11 1771 1777 2-s2.0-0032716268 (Pubitemid 29523568)
25. Erdi Y. E., Mawlawi O., Larson S. M., Imbriaco M., Yeung H., Finn R., Humm J. L., Segmentation of lung lesion volume by adaptive positron emission tomography image thresholding. Cancer 1997 80 12, supplement 2505 2509 2-s2.0-0031457987 (Pubitemid 28009506)
26. Srinivas S. M., Dhurairaj T., Basu S., Bural G., Surti S., Alavi A., A recovery coefficient method for partial volume correction of PET images. Annals of Nuclear Medicine 2009 23 4 341 348 2-s2.0-67651177441 10.1007/s12149-009- 0241-9
27. Jentzen W., Freudenberg L., Eising E. G., Heinze M., Brandau W., Bockisch A., Segmentation of PET volumes by iterative image thresholding. Journal of Nuclear Medicine 2007 48 1 108 114 2-s2.0-33847296687 (Pubitemid 47555383)
28. Schinagl D. A., Kaanders J. H., Oyen W. J., From anatomical to biological target volumes: the role of PET in radiation treatment planning. Cancer Imaging 2006 6 S107 S116 2-s2.0-34447519606 10.1102/1470-7330.2006.9017
29. Crawford D. C., Flower M. A., Pratt B. E., Hill C., Zweit J., McCready V. R., Harmer C. L., Thyroid volume measurement in thyrotoxic patients: comparison between ultrasonography and iodine-124 positron emission tomography. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine 1997 24 12 1470 1478 2-s2.0-0031450641 10.1007/s002590050176 (Pubitemid 28000022)
30. Krak N. C., Boellaard R., Hoekstra O. S., Twisk J. W. R., Hoekstra C. J., Lammertsma A. A., Effects of ROI definition and reconstruction method on quantitative outcome and applicability in a response monitoring trial. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 2005 32 3 294 301 2-s2.0-17644421807 10.1007/s00259-004-1566-1 (Pubitemid 40562120)
31. Gallivanone F., Stefano A., Grosso E., Canevari C., Gianolli L., Messa C., Gilardi M. C., Castiglioni I., PVE correction in PET-CT whole-body oncological studies from PVE-affected images images. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science 2011 58 3 736 747 2-s2.0-79959374069 10.1109/TNS.2011.2108316
32. Graham M. M., Peterson L. M., Hayward R. M., Comparison of simplified quantitative analyses of FDG uptake. Nuclear Medicine and Biology 2000 27 7 647 655 2-s2.0-0033747968 10.1016/S0969-8051(00)00143-8
33. Avril N., Bense S., Ziegler S. I., Dose J., Weber W., Laubenbacher C., Römer W., Jänicke F., Schwaiger M., Breast imaging with fluorine-18-FDG PET: quantitative image analysis. Journal of Nuclear Medicine 1997 38 8 1186 1191 2-s2.0-0030763016 (Pubitemid 27332609)
34. 18F-FDG PET studies for the differentiation of malignant and benign bone lesions. Journal of Nuclear Medicine 2002 43 4 510 518 2-s2.0-0036214199 (Pubitemid 34286347)
35. 18F]-fluorodeoxy-D-glucose to predict the pathologic response of breast cancer to primary chemotherapy. Journal of Clinical Oncology 2000 18 8 1676 1688 2-s2.0-0034002488 (Pubitemid 30220546)
36. Lee J. R., Madsen M. T., Bushnel D., Menda Y., A threshold method to improve standardized uptake value reproducibility. Nuclear Medicine Communications 2000 21 7 685 690 2-s2.0-0034231011
37. Kole A. C., Nieweg O. E., Pruim J., Standardized uptake value and quantification of metabolism for breast cancer imaging with FDG and L-[1-11C]Tyrosine PET. Journal of Nuclear Medicine 1997 38 5 692 696 2-s2.0-0030947570
38. 18F]fluoro-D-glucose. Molecular Imaging and Biology 2002 4 2 171 178 2-s2.0-0036202726 10.1016/S1536-1632(01)00004-X (Pubitemid 34272701)
39. Boellaard R., Krak N. C., Hoekstra O. S., Lammertsma A. A., Effects of noise, image resolution, and ROI definition on the accuracy of standard uptake values: a simulation study. Journal of Nuclear Medicine 2004 45 9 1519 1527 2-s2.0-6944235697 (Pubitemid 47618506)
40. Teräs M., Tolvanen T., Johansson J. J., Williams J. J., Knuuti J., Performance of the new generation of whole-body PET/CT scanners: Discovery STE and Discovery VCT. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 2007 34 10 1683 1692 2-s2.0-34748880661 10.1007/s00259-007-0493-3 (Pubitemid 47476933)
41. Daube-Witherspoon M. E., Karp J. S., Casey M. E., DiFilippo F. P., Hines H., Muehllehner G., Simcic V., Stearns C. W., Adam L.-E., Kohlmyer S., Sossi V., PET performance measurements using the NEMA NU 2-2001 standard. Journal of Nuclear Medicine 2002 43 10 1398 1409 2-s2.0-0036788462
42. Zito F., De Bernardi E., Soffientini C., Canzi C., Casati R., Gerundini P., The use of zeolites to generate PET phantoms for the validation of quantification strategies in oncology. Medical Physics 2012 39 9 5353 5361
43. 18F]- fluorodeoxyglucose and positron emission tomography: review and 1999 EORTC recommendations. European Journal of Cancer 1999 35 13 1773 1782 2-s2.0-0032757213 10.1016/S0959-8049(99)00229-4 (Pubitemid 29512308)
44. Boussion N., Cheze-Le Rest C., Hatt M., Visvikis D., Incorporation of wavelet-based denoising in iterative deconvolution for partial volume correction in whole-body PET imaging. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 2009 36 7 1064 1075 2-s2.0-67349149423 10.1007/s00259-009-1065-5
45. Teo B.-K., Seo Y., Bacharach S. L., Carrasquillo J. A., Libutti S. K., Shukla H., Hasegawa B. H., Hawkins R. A., Franc B. L., Partial-volume correction in PET: validation of an iterative postreconstruction method with phantom and patient data. Journal of Nuclear Medicine 2007 48 5 802 810 2-s2.0-34250373877 10.2967/jnumed.106.035576 (Pubitemid 47604982)
46. 18F-FDG PET. Journal of Nuclear Medicine 2010 51 2 268 276 2-s2.0-75749089680 10.2967/jnumed.109.066241
47. Castiglioni I., Rizzo G., Panzacchi A., Gilardi M. C., Fazio F., A MC-based PV correction method for PET/CT oncological studies. Proceedings of the IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference Record 2005 11 153
48. Rousset O. G., Rahmim A., Alavi A., Zaidi H., Partial volume correction strategies in PET. PET Clinics 2007 2 2 235 249 2-s2.0-58149226255 10.1016/j.cpet.2007.10.005
49. Chen C.-H., Muzic R. F. Jr., Nelson A. D., Adler L. P., Simultaneous recovery of size and radioactivity concentration of small spheroids with PET data. Journal of Nuclear Medicine 1999 40 1 118 130 2-s2.0-0032920128 (Pubitemid 29044182)
50. Baete K., Nuyts J., Laere K. V., Van Paesschen W., Ceyssens S., De Ceuninck L., Gheysens O., Kelles A., Van Den Eynden J., Suetens P., Dupont P., Evaluation of anatomy based reconstruction for partial volume correction in brain FDG-PET. NeuroImage 2004 23 1 305 317 2-s2.0-4344713436 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.04.041 (Pubitemid 39119461)
51. Strul D., Bendriem B., Robustness of anatomically guided pixel-by-pixel algorithms for partial volume effect correction in positron emission tomography. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism 1999 19 5 547 559 2-s2.0-0033503225 (Pubitemid 30159817)
52. Barbee D. L., Flynn R. T., Holden J. E., Nickles R. J., Jeraj R., A method for partial volume correction of PET-imaged tumor heterogeneity using expectation maximization with a spatially varying point spread function. Physics in medicine and biology 2010 55 1 221 236 2-s2.0-77649217850
53. Geworski L., Knoop B. O., de Cabrejas M. L., Knapp W. H., Munz D. L., Recovery correction for quantitation in emission tomography: a feasibility study. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine 2000 27 2 161 169 2-s2.0-0033955723 (Pubitemid 30102021)