Reasoning and personal epistemology: A critical reconstruction

Theory & Psychology

Volumn 23, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 616-638

  Falmagne, Rachel Joffe ^a   Iselin, Marie Geneviève ^b   Todorova, Irina L G ^c   Welsh, Jen Arner ^d  

^a CLARK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b LONG ISLAND JEWISH MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d Quinsigamond Community College   (United States)

Author keywords

discourse; epistemology; gender; reasoning; transdisciplinary

Indexed keywords

EID: 84885614234     PISSN: 09593543     EISSN: 14617447     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0959354313493530     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Abbey E. Falmagne R. J. (2007). Tension work within the complex self. Culture and Psychology, 13, 395–413.
2. Alcoff L. Potter E. (Eds.). (1993). Feminist epistemologies. New York, NY: Routledge.
3. Antony L. Witt C. (Eds.). (2002). A mind of one's own: Feminist essays on reason and objectivity. Boulder, CO: Westview.
4. Barrett M. (1991). The politics of truth from Marx to Foucault. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
5. Battiste M. (2006, May 3–6). Reclaiming indigenous voice and vision. Plenary Address Presented at the International Congress of Qualitative Inquiry, Urbana/Champaign, IL.
6. Belenky M. F. Clinchy B. M. Goldberger N. R. Tarule J. M. (1986). Women's ways of knowing: The development of self, voice and mind. New York, NY: Basic Books.
7. Billig M. Condor S. Edwards D. Middleton D. Radley A. (1988). Ideological dilemmas: A social psychology of everyday thinking. London, UK: Sage.
8. Bordo S. (1987). The flight to objectivity: Essays on Cartesianism and culture. New York: State University of New York Press.
9. Bordo S. (1989). The view from nowhere and the dream of everywhere: Heterogeneity, adequation, and feminist theory. American Philosophical Association Newsletter on Feminism and Philosophy, 88(2), 19–24.
10. Butler J. Scott J. (Eds.). (1992). Feminists theorize the political. New York, NY: Routledge.
11. Byrne R. M. J. Johnson-Laird P. N. (2009). “If” and the problems of conditional reasoning. Trends in Cognitive Science, 13, 282–287.
12. Charmaz K. (2000). Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In Denzin N. K. Lincoln Y. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 509–535). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13. Charmaz K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14. Cheng P. W. Holyoak K. J. (1985). Pragmatic reasoning schemas. Cognitive Psychology, 17, 391–416.
15. Code L. (1993). Taking subjectivity into account. In Alcoff L. Potter E. (Eds.), Feminist epistemologies (pp. 15–48). New York, NY: Routledge.
16. Code L. (1995). Rhetorical spaces: Essays on gendered locations. New York, NY: Routledge.
17. Collins P. H. (1990). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness and the politics of empowerment: New York, NY: Routledge.
18. Falmagne R. J. (2000). Positionality and thought: On the gendered foundations of thought, culture and development. In Miller P. H. Scholnick E. (Eds.), Developmental psychology through the lenses of feminist theories (pp. 191–213). New York, NY: Routledge.
19. Falmagne R. J. (2004). On the constitution of ‘self’ and ‘mind–: The dialectic of the system and the person. Theory & Psychology, 14, 822–845.
20. Falmagne R. J. (2006). The dialectic of the particular and the general. International Journal of Critical Psychology, 17, 167–184.
21. Falmagne R. J. (2009). Subverting theoretical dualisms: Mentalism and discourse. Theory & Psychology, 19, 795–815
22. Falmagne R. J. (2013). Psychological inquiry and disciplinary psychology: Distinct problematics. In Marvakis A. Motzkau J. Painter D. Ruto-Korir R. Sullivan G. Triliva S. Wieser M. (Eds.), Doing psychology under new conditions (pp. 96–102). Concord, Canada: Captus.
23. Falmagne R. J. Gonsalves J. (1995). Deductive inference. Annual Review of Psychology, 46, 525–559.
24. Falmagne R. J. Hass M. (2002). Representing reason: Feminist theory and formal logic. New York, NY: Rowman and Littlefield.
25. Flax J. (1993). Disputed subjects: Essays on psychoanalysis, subjects, politics, and philosophy. New York, NY: Routledge.
26. Foucault M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972–1977 (Gordon C., Ed.; Gordon C. Mepham J. Soper K. Marshall L. Trans.). New York, NY: Pantheon.
27. Fraser N. (1989). Unruly practices: Power, discourse, and gender in contemporary social theory. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
28. Glenn E. N. (1999). Social construction and institutionalization of gender and race: An integrative approach. In Ferree M. M. Lorber J. Hess B. (Eds.), Revisioning gender (pp. 3–43). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
29. Goldberger N. R. Tarule J. M. Clinchy B. M. Belenky M. F. (Eds.). (1996). Knowledge, difference, and power: Essays inspired by “Women's ways of knowing”. New York, NY: Basic Books.
30. Goldman A. (1987). Epistemology and cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
31. Greco M. Stenner P. (2008). Emotion: A social science reader. London, UK: Routledge.
32. Hall S. (1996). Cultural studies and its theoretical legacies. In Morley D. Chen K. H. (Eds.), Stuart Hall: Critical dialogues in cultural studies (pp. 262–275). London, UK: Routledge.
33. Harding S. (1996). Gendered ways of knowing and the “epistemological crisis” of the West. In Goldberger N. R. Tarule J. M. Clinchy B. M. Belenky M. F. (Eds.), Knowledge, difference, and power: Essays inspired by “Women's ways of knowing” (pp. 431–454). New York, NY: Basic Books.
34. Harding S. (1998). Is science multicultural? Postcolonialisms, feminisms, and epistemologies. Bloomington: Indiana University Press
35. Harding S. (Ed.). (2004). The feminist standpoint reader: Intellectual and political controversies. New York, NY: Routledge.
36. Hofer B. (2004). Paradigmatic approaches to personal epistemology: Introduction to the special issue. Educational Psychologist, 39, 1–3.
37. Hofer B. Pintrich P. (2002). Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
38. Hooks B. (1990). Choosing the margin as a space of radical openness. In Yearning: Race, gender, and cultural politics (pp. 145–154). Boston, MA: South End Press.
39. Ilyenkov E. V. (1982). The dialectics of the abstract and the concrete in Marx's Capital (Kuzyakov S., Trans.). Moscow, Russia: Progress Publishers. (Original work published 1960)
40. Johnson-Laird P. N. (1983). Mental models. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
41. Khine M. S. (2008). Epistemological studies across diverse cultures. New York, NY: Springer.
42. Kornblith H. (1985). Naturalizing epistemology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
43. Le Doeuff M. (2002). The philosophical imaginary (Gordon C., Trans.). London, UK: Continuum. (Original work published 1980)
44. Lloyd G. (1984). The man of reason: “Male” and “female” in Western philosophy. London, UK: Methuen.
45. Lloyd G. (1993). Maleness, metaphor, and the “crisis” of reason. In Antony L. M. Witt C. (Eds.), A mind of one's own: Feminist essays on reason and objectivity (pp. 69–84). Boulder, CO: Westview.
46. Narayan U. Harding S. (Eds.). (2000). Decentering the center: Philosophy for a multicultural, postcolonial, and feminist world. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
47. Nisbett R. E. Peng K. Choi I. Norenzayan A. (2001). Culture and systems of thought: Holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological Review, 101, 291–310.
48. Penn D. C. Cheng P. Holyoak K. J. (2009). There is more to thinking than propositions. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32, 221–223.
49. Strauss A. Corbin J. (2005). Grounded theory methodology: An overview. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
50. te Molder H. Potter J. (Eds.). (2005). Conversation and cognition: Discourse, mind, and social interaction. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
51. Tuana N. Morgen S. (2001). Engendering rationalities. New York: State University of New York Press.
52. Wetherell M. (2012). Affect and emotion: A new social science understanding. London, UK: Sage.
53. Wetherell M. Potter J. (1988). Discourse analysis and the identification of interpretative repertoires. In Antaki C. (Ed.), Analysing everyday explanations: A casebook of methods (pp. 168–183). London, UK: Sage.