Learning by focusing: A new framework for concept recognition and feature selection

Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages

  Cao, Liangliang ^a   Gong, Leiguang ^a   Kender, John R ^a,b   Codella, Noel C ^a   Smith, John R ^a  

^a IBM T J WATSON RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

^b Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

Author keywords

classification; feature selection; learning by focusing

Indexed keywords

CONCEPT RECOGNITION; CONCEPT STRUCTURES; HUMAN VISION; NEW APPROACHES; NONLINEAR CLASSIFIERS; VISUAL FEATURE;

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); EXHIBITIONS; EXPERIMENTS; FEATURE EXTRACTION;

FOCUSING;

EID: 84885602272     PISSN: 19457871     EISSN: 1945788X     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ICME.2013.6607609     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. N. Pinto, D.O. Cox, and J.J. DiCarlo, "Why is real-world visual object recognition hard?, " PLoS computational biology, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. e27, 2008.
2. I. Ponce, Toward categO/y-level object recognition, vol. 4170, Springer-Verlag New York Inc, 2006.
3. Kristen Grauman and Bastian Leibe, "Visual object recognition, " Synthesis Lectures on Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 1-181, 2011.
4. A.S. Kaplan and G.L. Murphy, "Category learning with minimal prior knowledge., " Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memo/y, and Cognition, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 829, 2000.
5. S. Tobias, "Interest, prior knowledge, and learning, " Review of Educational Research, vol. 64, no. I, pp. 37, 1994 .
6. L. Fei-Fei, R. Fergus, and P. Perona, "Learning generative visual models from few training examples: An incremental bayesian approach tested on 101 object categories, " Computer Vision and image Understanding, vol. 106, no. 1, pp. 59-70, 2007.
7. G. Griffin, A Holub, and P. Perona, "Caltech-256 object category dataset, " Tech. Rep. 7694, California Institute of Technology, 2007.
8. R. Rifkin and A. Klautau, "In defense of one-vs-all classification, " JMLR, vol. 5, pp. 101-141, 2004.
9. R.E. Fan, K.W. Chang, C.1. Hsieh, X.R. Wang, and C.1. Lin, "Liblinear: A library for large linear classification, " JMLR, vol. 9, pp. 1871-1874, 2008.
10. H.F. Yu, C.1. Hsieh, K.W. Chang, and C.1. Lin, "Large linear classification when data cannot fit in memory, " in ACM SIGKDD. ACM, 2010, pp. 833-842.
11. AP. Natsev, M.R. Naphade, and J.R. Smith, "Semantic representation: search and mining of multimedia content, " in SiGKDD, 2004, pp. 641-646.
12. R. Yan, 1. Tesic, and 1.R. Smith, "Model-shared subspace boosting for multi-label classification, " in ACM SiGKDD, 2007, pp. 834-843.
13. M. Naphade, J.R. Smith, J. Tesic, S.F. Chang, W. Hsu, L. Kennedy, A. Hauptmann, and J. Curtis, "Large-scale concept ontology for multimedia, " iEEE Multimedia, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 86-91, 2006.
14. M.E.L. Van and A. Zisserrnan, "The pascal visual object classes (VOC) challenge, " JJCV, vol. 88, no. 3, pp. 3-338, 2010.
15. J. Deng, W. Dong, R. Socher, L.I. Li, K. Li, and 1. Fei-Fei, "Imagenet: A large-scale hierarchical image database, " in CVPR, 2009, pp. 248-255.
16. S. Maji, A.C. Berg, and 1. Malik, "Classification using intersection kernel support vector machines is efficient, " in C VP R, 2008.
17. I. Breiman, "Bagging predictors, " Machine learning, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 123-140, 1996.
18. J.H. Friedman, "Stochastic gradient boosting, " Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 367-378, 2002.