A probabilistic model for online scenario labeling in dynamic event tree generation

Reliability Engineering and System Safety

Volumn 120, Issue , 2013, Pages 18-26

  Zamalieva, Daniya ^a   Yilmaz, Alper ^a   Aldemir, Tunc ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Dynamic PRA; Scenario labeling; Transient analysis

Indexed keywords

FAST REACTORS; HIDDEN MARKOV MODELS; TRANSIENT ANALYSIS;

COMPUTATIONAL SAVINGS; COMPUTATIONAL TIME AND STORAGE; FAILURE BEHAVIORS; FAILURE SCENARIOS; INITIATING EVENTS; PROBABILISTIC MODELING; SYSTEM EVOLUTION; SYSTEM SIMULATIONS;

COMPUTER SIMULATION;

EID: 84885601967     PISSN: 09518320     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2013.02.028     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Hassan M, Aldemir T. A data base oriented dynamic methodology for the failure analysis of closed loop control systems in process plant. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 1990;27(3):275-322. (Pubitemid 20649335)
2. Acosta C, Siu N. Dynamic event trees in accident sequence analysis: application to steam generator tube rupture. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 1993;41(2):135-54.
3. Cojazzi G. The DYLAM approach for the dynamic reliability analysis of systems. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 1996;52(3):279-96. (Pubitemid 126394193)
4. Hsueh K, Mosleh A. The development and application of the accident dynamic simulator for dynamic probabilistic risk assessment of nuclear power plants. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 1996;52(3):297-314. (Pubitemid 126394194)
5. Metzroth K, Denning R, Aldemir T. Dynamic event tree analysis as a risk management tool. In: Proceedings of the American nuclear society (ANS) ICAPP 2010 topical meeting: international congress on advances in nuclear power plants, 2010.
6. Munoz R, Minguez E, Melendez E, Izquierdo JM, Sanchez-Perea M. DENDROS: a second generation scheduler for dynamic event trees. In: Aragones JM, Ahnert C, Cabellos O, editors. M&C'99. Madrid, Spain: Senda Editorial, SA; 1999. p. 1358-67.
7. Marchand S, Tombuyses B, Labeau P. DDET and Monte Carlo simulation to solve some dynamic reliability problems. In: PSAM4, vol. 3,1998. p. 2055-60.
8. Kloos M, Peschke J. MCDET: a probabilistic dynamics method combining Monte Carlo simulation with the discrete dynamic event tree approach. Nuclear Science and Engineering 2006;3(2):137-56. (Pubitemid 43979451)
9. Gauntt RO, Cole RK, Hodge SA, Rodriguez SB, Sanders Rl, Smith RC, et al. MELCOR computer code manuals. In: NUREG/CR-6119/SAND 2005-5713. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission; 2005.
10. Fletcher CD, Schultz RR. RELAP5/MOD3 user guidelines. In: NUREG/CR-5535. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission; 1992.
11. Mercurio D, Podofillini L, Zio E, Dang VN. Identification and classification of dynamic event tree scenarios via possibilistic clustering: application to a steam generator tube rupture event. Accident Analysis and Prevention 2009;41:1180-91.
12. Podofillini L, Zio E, Mercurio D, Dang VN. Dynamic safety assessment: scenario identification via a possibilistic clustering approach. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 2010;95:534-49.
13. Mandelli D, Yilmaz A, Metzroth K, Aldemir T, Denning R. Scenario aggregation and analysis via mean-shift methodology. In: Proceedings of the American nuclear society (ANS) ICAPP 2010 topical meeting: international congress on advances in nuclear power plants, 2010. p. 990-4.
14. Baum LE, Petrie T. Statistical inference for probabilistic functions of finite state Markov chains. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 1966;37(6):1554-63.
15. Zamalieva D, Yilmaz A, Aldemir T. A probabilistic model for online scenario labeling in dynamic event tree generation. In: Annual European safety and reliability conference, 2011.
16. Zamalieva D, Yilmaz A, Aldemir T. Online scenario labeling using a hidden Markov model for assessment of nuclear plant state. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 2013;110:1-13.
17. Labeau PE. Probabilistic dynamics: estimation of generalized unreliability through efficient Monte Carlo simulation. Annals of Nuclear Energy 1996;17: 1355-69. (Pubitemid 126374900)
18. Rabiner L. A tutorial on hidden Markov models and selected applications in speech recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE 1989;77(2):257-86.
19. Russell SJ, Norvig P. Artificial intelligence: a modern approach. Prentice Hall series in artificial intelligence. 2nd ed. Prentice Hall; 2002.
20. Baum LE, Petrie T, Soules G, Weiss N. A maximization technique occurring in the statistical analysis of probabilistic functions of Markov chains. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 1970;41(1):164-71.
21. Dempster AP, Laird NM, Rubin DB. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological) 1977;39(1):1 -38.
22. MacDonald L, Zucchini W. Hidden Markov models for time series: an introduction using R. London: Chapman and Hall; 2009.
23. Hassan MR, Nath B. Stock market forecasting using hidden Markov model: a new approach. In: Proceedings of 5th international conference on intelligent systems design and applications ISDA'05, 2005. p. 192-6.
24. Oates T, Firoiu L, Cohen PR. Clustering time series with hidden Markov models and dynamic time warping. In: Proceedings of the IJCAI-99 workshop on neural, symbolic and reinforcement learning methods for sequence learning, 1999. p. 17-21.
25. Huang X, Jack M, Ariki Y. Hidden Markov models for speech recognition. Edinburgh University Press; 1990.
26. Durbin R, Eddy SR, Krogh A, Mitchison G. Biological sequence analysis: probabilistic models of proteins and nucleic acids. Cambridge University Press; 1999.
27. MacQueen JB. Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations. In: Cam LML, Neyman J, editors. Proceedings of the 5th Berkeley symposium on mathematical statistics and probability, vol. 1. University of California Press; 1967. p. 281-97.