A probabilistic model for online scenario labeling in dynamic event tree generation

Advances in Safety, Reliability and Risk Management - Proceedings of the European Safety and Reliability Conference, ESREL 2011

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 277-284

  Zamalieva, D ^a   Yilmaz, A ^a   Aldemir, T ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

APRIORI; CLASSIFICATION PROCESS; COMPUTATIONAL RESOURCES; COMPUTATIONAL SAVINGS; DYNAMIC EVENTS; EVENT TREES; INITIATING EVENTS; LIKELIHOOD COMPUTATION; ON-LINE CLASSIFICATION; PASSIVE DECAY; PROBABILISTIC MODELS; REACTOR VESSEL; SAMPLE FAILURE; SYSTEM SIMULATIONS; TIME DEPENDENT BEHAVIOR;

HIDDEN MARKOV MODELS; NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS; NUCLEAR REACTORS; RELIABILITY; RISK MANAGEMENT;

COMPUTER SIMULATION;

EID: 84856699407     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. Acosta, C. & N. Siu (1993). Dynamic event trees in accident sequence analysis: Application to steam generator tube rupture. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 41(2), 135-154.
2. Arbib, M.A. (1969). Theories of Abstract Automata. Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
3. Bashir, F, A. Khokhar, & D. Schonfeld (2007, July). Object trajectory-based activity classification and recognition using hidden markov models. Image Processing, IEEE Transactions on 16(1), 1912-1919.
4. Baum, L.E. & T. Petrie (1966). Statistical Inference for Probabilistic Functions of Finite State Markov Chains. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 37(6), 1554-1563.
5. Baum, L.E., T. Petrie, G. Soules, & N. Weiss (1970). A Maximization Technique Occurring in the Statistical Analysis of Probabilistic Functions of Markov Chains. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 41(1), 164-171.
6. Cojazzi, G. (1996). The dylam approach for the dynamic reliability analysis of systems. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 52(3), 279-296.
7. Dempster, A.P, N.M. Laird, & D.B. Rubin (1977). Maximum Likelihood from Incomplete Data via the EM Algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological) 39(1), 1-38.
8. Durbin, R., S.R. Eddy, A. Krogh, & G. Mitchison (1999). BiologicalSequence Analysis: Probabilistic Models of Proteins and Nucleic Acids. Cambridge University Press.
9. Fletcher, CD. & R.R. Schultz (1992). Relap5/mod3 user guidelines. In NUREG/CR-5535, U. S Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C.
10. Gauntt, R.O., R.K. Cole, S.A. Hodge, S.B. Rodriguez, R. I. Sanders, R.C. Smith, D.S. Stuart, R.M. Summers, & M.F Young (2005). Melcor computer code manuals. In NUREG/CR-6119/SAND 2005-5713, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C.
11. Hassan, M. & T. Aldemir (1990). A data base oriented dynamic methodology for the failure analysis of closed loop control systems in process plant. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 27(3), 275-322.
12. Hassan, M.R. & B. Nath (2005). Stock market forecasting using hidden markov model: a new approach. In 5th International Conference on Intelligent Systems Design and Applications ISDA05, Poland, pp. 192-196.
13. Hsueh, K. & A. Mosleh (1996). The development and application of the accident dynamic simulator for dynamic probabilistic risk assessment of nuclear power plants. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 52(3), 297-314.
14. Huang, X., M. Jack, & Y. Ariki (1990). Hidden Markov Models for Speech Recognition. Edinburg University Press.
15. MacDonald, L. & W Zucchini (2009). Hidden Markov Models for Time Series: An Introduction Using R. London: Chapman and Hall.
16. MacQueen, JB. (1967). Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations. In L.M.L. Cam and J. Neyman (Eds.), Proc. of the fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, Volume 1, pp. 281-297. University of California Press.
17. Mandelli, D., A. Yilmaz, K. Metzroth, T. Aldemir, & R. Denning (2010). Scenario aggregation and analysis via meanshift methodology. In Proceedings of the American Nuclear Society (ANS) ICAPP 2010 Topical Meeting International Congress on Advances in Nuclear Power Plants, San Diego (CA), pp. 990-994.
18. Marchand, S., B. Tombuyses, & P. Labeau (1998). Ddet and monte carlo simulation to solve some dynamic reliability problems. PSAM4 3, 2055-2060.
19. Metzroth, K., R. Denning, & T. Aldemir (2010). Dynamic event tree analysis as a risk management tool. In Proceedings of the American Nuclear Society (ANS) ICAPP 2010 Topical Meeting International Congress on Advances in Nuclear Power Plants, San Diego (CA).
20. Oates, T., L. Firoiu, & PR. Cohen (1999). Clustering time series with hidden markov models and dynamic time warping. In Proceedings of the IJCAI-99 Work- shop on Neural, Symbolic and Reinforcement Learning Methods for Sequence Learning, pp. 17-21.
21. Pearl, J. (1985). Bayesian networks: A model of self-activated memory for evidential reasoning. In Proceedings of the 7th Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, University of California, Irvine, pp. 329-334.
22. Rabiner, L. (1989). A tutorial on hidden markov models and selected applications in speech recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE, pp. 257-286.
23. Russell, S.J. & P. Norvig (2002). Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach (Second ed.). Prentice Hall series in artificial intelligence. Prentice Hall.
24. Viterbi, A. (1967, April). Error bounds for convolutional codes and an asymptotically optimum decoding algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 13(2), 260-269.
25. Zamalieva, D., A. Yilmaz, & T. Aldemir (2011). Online state estimation in dynamic event trees for a level controller dataset. In International Topical Meeting on Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Analysis, Wilmington (NC).