Reducing the incidence of revision rhinoplasty

Journal of Otolaryngology

Volumn 36, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 130-134

  Thomson, Christopher ^a   Mendelsohn, Martyn ^b,c  

^a CHRISTCHURCH HOSPITAL   (New Zealand)

^b Sydney Ear Nose and Throat and Facial Cosmetic Day Surgery   (Australia)

^c NONE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Airway; Crooked; Incidence; Nasal; Revision rhinoplasty

Indexed keywords

AIRWAY OBSTRUCTION; ESTHETICS; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NOSE INJURY; NOSE OBSTRUCTION; NOSE RECONSTRUCTION; PATIENT COUNSELING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; REVIEW; RISK REDUCTION; SKILL; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; WOUND HEALING;

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; REOPERATION; RHINOPLASTY;

EID: 34347272975     PISSN: 03816605     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2310/7070.2007.0012     Document Type: Review

References (8)

1. Parkes ML, Kanodia R, Machida BK. Revision rhinoplasty. An analysis of aesthetic deformities. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1992;118:695-701.
2. Bagal AA, Adamson PA. Revision rhinoplasty. Facial Plast Surg 2002; 18:233-43.
3. Pardin AJ, Vaca JF. Evaluation of different methods used in the treatment of rhinoplastic sequelae. Aesthetic Plast Surg 1983;7:237-9.
4. Klabunde EH, Fakes E. Incidence of complications in cosmetic rhinoplasties. Plast Reconstr Surg 1964;34:192.
5. Smith TW. As clay in the potter's hand. Ohio Med J 1967;63:1055.
6. McKinney P, Cook JQ. A critical evaluation of 200 rhinoplasties. Ann Plast Surg 1981;7:357-61.
7. Kamer FN, McQuown SA. Revision rhinoplasty. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1988;114:257-66.
8. Vuyk HD, Watts SJ, Vindayak B. Revision rhinoplasty: review of deformities, aetiology and treatment strategies. Clin Otolaryngol 2000;25:476-81.