Focused ultrasonic propulsion of kidney stones: Recny CHNiew and update of preclinical technology

Journal of Endourology

Volumn 27, Issue 10, 2013, Pages 1183-1186

  Sorensen, Mathew D ^a   Bailey, Michael R ^b   Hsi, Ryan S ^a   Cunitz, Bryan W ^b   Simon, Julianna C ^b   Wang, Yak Nam ^b   Dunmire, Barbrina L ^b   Paun, Marla ^b   Starr, Frank ^b   Lu, Wei ^b   Ecny CHNan, Andrew P ^c   Harper, Jonathan D ^a  

^a Unicny CHNersity of Washington School of Medicine   (United States)

^b Center for Industrial and Medical Ultrasound   (United States)

^c INDIANA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; COMPUTER MOUSE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; ENDOUROLOGY; EXTRACORPOREAL LITHOTRIPSY; FOCUSED ULTRASONIC PROPULSION; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; IMAGING SYSTEM; IONIZING RADIATION; KIDNEY PELVIS; LEARNING CURVE; NEPHROLITHIASIS; NON INVASIVE PROCEDURE; NONHUMAN; PATIENT SAFETY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOFREQUENCY; REAL TIME ECHOGRAPHY; RETREATMENT; TISSUE INJURY; ULTRASOUND THERAPY; ULTRASOUND TRANSDUCER; URETEROPELVIC JUNCTION; URETEROSCOPY; UROLITHIASIS;

ANIMALS; HUMANS; KIDNEY CALCULI; LITHOTRIPSY; SWINE; UROLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES;

EID: 84885465119     PISSN: 08927790     EISSN: 1557900X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/end.2013.0315     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Osman M, Wendt-Nordahl G, Heger K, Michel MS, Alken P, Knoll T. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy with ultrasonographyguided renal access: Experience from over 300 cases. BJU Int 2005;96:875-878
2. Altunrende F, Tefekli A, Stein RJ, et al. Clinically insignificant residual fragments after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Medium-Term follow-up. J Endourol 2011;25:941-945
3. Raman JD, Bagrodia A, Gupta A, et al. Natural history of residual fragments following percutaneous nephrostolithotomy. J Urol 2009;181:1163-1168
4. Rebuck DA, Macejko A, Bhalani V, Ramos P, Nadler RB. The natural history of renal stone fragments following ureteroscopy. Urology 2011;77:564-568
5. Skolarikos A, Papatsoris AG. Diagnosis and management of postpercutaneous nephrolithotomy residual stone fragments. J Endourol 2009;23:1751-1755
6. Osman MM, Alfano Y, Kamp S, et al. 5-year-follow-up of patients with clinically insignificant residual fragments after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy. Eur Urol 2005;47: 860-864
7. Koh LT, Ng FC, Ng KK. Outcomes of long-Term follow-up of patients with conservative management of asymptomatic renal calculi. BJU Int 2012;109:622-625
8. Preminger GM, Tiselius DG, Assimos D, et al. 2007 Guideline for the Management of Ureteral Calculi www.auanet .org/content/clinical-practice- guidelines/clinical-guidelines. cfm?sub = uc (Accessed March 21, 2013
9. Fernandez R, Tan YK, Kaberle W, et al. Determining a performance envelope for capture of kidney stones functionalized with superparamagnetic microparticles. J Endourol 2012;26:1227-1230
10. Bailey M, Wang YN, Simon JC, et al. Acoustic radiation force to reposition kidney stones. J Acoust Soc Am 2013; 133:3279
11. Harper JD, Sorensen MD, Cunitz BW, et al. Focused ultrasound to expel calculi from the kidney: Safety and efficacy of a clinical prototype device. J Urol 2013;190:1090-1095
12. Hsi RS, Penniston KL, Crenshaw TD, et al. Focused Ultrasound Repositions De Novo Calculi in an Established Stone-Forming Porcine Model. Engineering in Urology Society Annual Meeting, San Diego, CA, 2013
13. Shah A, Harper JD, Cunitz BW, et al. Focused ultrasound to expel calculi from the kidney. J Urol 2012;187:739-743
14. Shah A, Owen NR, Lu W, et al. Novel ultrasound method to reposition kidney stones. Urol Res 2010;38:491-495
15. Wang YN, Simon JC, Cunitz BW, et al. Determination of tissue injury thresholds from ultrasound in a porcine kidney model. J Acoust Soc Am 2013;133:3411
16. de Souza LR, Goldman SM, Faintuch S, et al. Comparison between ultrasound and noncontrast helical computed tomography for identification of acute ureterolithiasis in a teaching hospital setting. Sao Paulo Med J 2007;125: 102-107
17. Fowler KA, Locken JA, Duchesne JH, Williamson MR. US for detecting renal calculi with nonenhanced CT as a reference standard. Radiology 2002;222:109-113
18. Haroun AA, Hadidy AM, Mithqal AM, Mahafza WS, Al-Riyalat NT, Sheikh-Ali RF. The role of B-mode ultrasonography in the detection of urolithiasis in patients with acute renal colic. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl 2010;21: 488-493
19. Ray AA, Ghiculete D, Pace KT, Honey RJ. Limitations to ultrasound in the detection and measurement of urinary tract calculi. Urology 2010;76:295-300
20. Ripolles T, Agramunt M, Errando J, Martinez MJ, Coronel B, Morales M. Suspected ureteral colic: Plain film and sonography vs unenhanced helical CT. A prospective study in 66 patients. Eur Radiol 2004;14:129-136
21. Ulusan S, Koc Z, Tokmak N. Accuracy of sonography for detecting renal stone: Comparison with CT. J Clin Ultrasound 2007;35:256-261
22. Viprakasit DP, Sawyer MD, Herrell SD, Miller NL. Limitations of ultrasonography in the evaluation of urolithiasis: A correlation with computed tomography. J Endourol 2012; 26:209-213
23. De Sio M, Autorino R, Di Lorenzo G, et al. Medical expulsive treatment of distal-ureteral stones using tamsulosin: A single-center experience. J Endourol 2006;20:12-16
24. Dellabella M, Milanese G, Muzzonigro G. Efficacy of tamsulosin in the medical management of juxtavesical ureteral stones. J Urol 2003;170(6 Pt 1):2202-2205
25. Resim S, Ekerbicer H, Ciftci A. Effect of tamsulosin on the number and intensity of ureteral colic in patients with lower ureteral calculus. Int J Urol 2005;12:615-620
26. El-Nahas AR, Ibrahim HM, Youssef RF, Sheir KZ. Flexible ureterorenoscopy versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for treatment of lower pole stones of 10-20mm. BJU Int 2012;110:898-902
27. Pearle MS, Lingeman JE, Leveillee R, et al. Prospective, randomized trial comparing shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy for lower pole caliceal calculi 1 cm or less. J Urol 2005;173:2005-2009