Learning curcny CHNe and perioperaticny CHNe outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in 200 initial japanese cases by a single surgeon

Journal of Endourology

Volumn 27, Issue 10, 2013, Pages 1218-1223

  Hashimoto, Takeshi ^a   Yoshioka, Kunihiko ^a   Gondo, Tatsuo ^a   Kamoda, Naohiro ^a   Satake, Naoya ^a   Ozu, Choichiro ^a   Horiguchi, Yutaka ^a   Namiki, Kazunori ^a   Nakashima, Jun ^a   Tachibana, Masaaki ^a  

^a Department of Urology   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN;

ADULT; AGED; ANASTOMOSIS LEAKAGE; ANGINA PECTORIS; ARTICLE; BLADDER NECK; BODY MASS; CANCER PATIENT; CANCER SURGERY; CHOLECYSTITIS; DRUG ERUPTION; FOLLOW UP; GLEASON SCORE; HUMAN; ILEUS; INTERNATIONAL INDEX OF ERECTILE FUNCTION; JAPANESE; LEARNING CURVE; LUNG EDEMA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE PROCEDURE; OPERATION DURATION; OPERATIVE BLOOD LOSS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PENIS DISEASE; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PERSONAL EXPERIENCE; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATE VOLUME; PROSTATECTOMY; RETINA ARTERY OCCLUSION; ROBOT ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; ROBOTICS; SURGEON; SURGICAL TRAINING; URETHRAL CATHETERIZATION; URINARY TRACT INFECTION; URINE INCONTINENCE; URINE RETENTION; EDUCATION; LAPAROSCOPY; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PROSTATE TUMOR; TIME;

AGED; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; LEARNING CURVE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OPERATIVE TIME; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; ROBOTICS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84885455853     PISSN: 08927790     EISSN: 1557900X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/end.2013.0235     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J, Ward E: Cancer statistics, 2010. CA Cancer J Clin 2010;60:277-300
2. Gondo T, Yoshioka K, Hashimoto T, et al. The powerful impact of double-layered posterior rhabdosphincter reconstruction on early recovery of urinary continence after robotassisted radical prostatectomy. J Endourol 2012;26:1159-1164
3. Coelho RF, Rocco B, Patel MB, et al. Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-Assisted radical prostatectomy: A critical review of outcomes reported by high-volume centers. J Endourol 2010;24:2003-2015
4. Schuessler WW, Schulam PG, Clayman RV, Kavoussi LR. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Initial short-Term experience. Urology 1997;50:854-857
5. Abbou CC, Salomon L, Hoznek A, et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Preliminary results. Urology 2000;55:630-634
6. Rassweiler J, Sentker L, Seemann O, et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with the Heilbronn technique: An analysis of the first 180 cases. J Urol 2001;166:2101-2108
7. Guillonneau B, el-Fettouh H, Baumert H, et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Oncological evaluation after 1,000 cases a Montsouris Institute. J Urol 2003;169:1261-1266
8. Mottrie A, Van Migem P, De Naeyer G, et al. Robot-Assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Oncologic and functional results of 184 cases. Eur Urol 2007;52:746-750
9. Zorn KC, Gautam G, Shalhav AL, et al. Training, credentialing, proctoring and medicolegal risks of robotic urological surgery: Recommendations of the society of urologic robotic surgeons. J Urol 2009;182:1126-1132
10. Orvieto MA, Patel VR. Evolution of robot-Assisted radical prostatectomy. Scand J Surg 2009;98:76-88
11. Patel VR, Tully AS, Holmes R, Lindsay J. Robotic radical prostatectomy in the community setting-The learning curve and beyond: Initial 200 cases. J Urol 2005;174:269-272
12. McNeill AS, Nabi G, McLornan L, et al. Endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: Critical analysis of outcomes and learning curve. BJU Int 2010;106:1537-1543
13. Gumus E, Boylu U, Turan T, Onol FF. The learning curve of robot-Assisted radical prostatectomy. J Endourol 2011;25: 1633-1637
14. Imamoto T, Goto Y, Utsumi T, et al. Complications, urinary continence, and oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Single-surgeon experience for the first 100 cases. Prostate Cancer 2011;2011:606505
15. Ficarra V, Cavalleri S, Novara G, et al. Evidence from robotassisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: A systematic review. Eur Urol 2007;51:45-56
16. Menon M, Tewari A, Peabody JO, et al. Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy, a technique of robotic radical prostatectomy for management of localized carcinoma of the prostate: Experience of over 1100 cases. Urol Clin North Am 2004; 31:701-717
17. Menon M, Shrivastava A, Tewari A, et al. Laparoscopic and robot assisted radical prostatectomy: Establishment of a structured program and preliminary analysis of outcomes. J Urol 2002;168:945-949
18. Artibani W, Fracalanza S, Cavalleri S, et al. Learning curve and preliminary experience with da Vinci-Assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Urol Int 2008;80:237-244
19. Bentas W, Wolfram M, Jones J, et al. Robotic technology and the translation of open radical prostatectomy to laparoscopy: The early Frankfurt experience with robotic radical prostatectomy and one year follow-up. Eur Urol 2003;44:175-181
20. Yoshioka K, Hatano T, Nakagami Y, et al. [First 24 Japanese cases of robotic-Assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy using the daVinci Surgical System]. (Jap) Hinyokika Kiyo 2008;54:333-339
21. Zorn KC, Orvieto MA, Gong EM, et al. Robotic radical prostatectomy learning curve of a fellowship-Trained laparoscopic surgeon. J Endourol 2007;21:441-447
22. Stolzenburg JU, Rabenalt R, Do M, et al. Endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: The University of Leipzig experience of 1,300 cases. World J Urol 2007;25:45-51
23. Patel VR, Palmer KJ, Coughlin G, Samavedi S. Robotassisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Perioperative outcomes of 1500 cases. J Endourol 2008;22:2299-2305
24. Chabert CC, Merrilees DA, Neill MG, Eden CG. Curtain dissection of the lateral prostatic fascia and potency after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: A veil of mystery. BJU Int 2008;101:1285-1288
25. Zorn KC, Gofrit ON, Orvieto MA, et al. Robotic-Assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: Functional and pathologic outcomes with interfascial nerve preservation. Eur Urol 2007; 51:755-763
26. Guru KA, Perlmutter AE, Sheldon MJ, et al. Apical margins after robot-Assisted radical prostatectomy: Does technique matter? J Endourol 2009;23:123-127
27. Hashimoto T, Yoshioka K, Gondo T, et al. Predictors for positive surgical margins after robot-Assisted radical prostatectomy: A single surgeon's series in Japan. Int J Urol 2013. Epub ahead of print
28. Menon M, Shrivastava A, Kaul S, et al. Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy: Contemporary technique and analysis of results. Eur Urol 2007;51:648-658
29. Tewari A, Srivasatava A, Menon M; Members of the VIP Team. A prospective comparison of radical retropubic and robot-Assisted prostatectomy: Experience in one institution. BJU Int 2003;92:205-210