Predictors for positive surgical margins after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: A single surgeon's series in Japan

International Journal of Urology

Volumn 20, Issue 9, 2013, Pages 873-878

  Hashimoto, Takeshi ^a   Yoshioka, Kunihiko ^a   Gondo, Tatsuo ^a   Takeuchi, Hisashi ^a   Nakagami, Yoshihiro ^a   Nakashima, Jun ^a   Tachibana, Masaaki ^a  

^a TOKYO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Positive surgical margins; Prostate cancer; Prostate specific antigen density; Robot assisted radical prostatectomy; Surgeon volume

Indexed keywords

PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CANCER PROGNOSIS; CANCER STAGING; CANCER SURGERY; GLEASON SCORE; HUMAN; JAPAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE BIOPSY; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATE VOLUME; PROSTATECTOMY; ROBOTICS; SURGEON; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;

POSITIVE SURGICAL MARGINS; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN DENSITY; ROBOT-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; SURGEON VOLUME;

HUMANS; MALE; NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL; PHYSICIANS; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; ROBOTICS;

EID: 84883456528     PISSN: 09198172     EISSN: 14422042     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/iju.12081     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Psutka SP, Feldman AS, Rodin D etal. Men with organ-confined prostate cancer and positive surgical margins develop biochemical failure at a similar rate to men with extracapsular extension. Urology 2011; 78: 121-125.
2. Lake AM, He C, Wood DP Jr. Focal positive surgical margins decrease disease-free survival after radical prostatectomy even in organ-confined disease. Urology 2010; 76: 1212-1216.
3. Shikanov SA, Thong A, Gofrit ON etal. Robotic laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for biopsy Gleason 8 to 10: prediction of favorable pathologic outcome with preoperative parameters. J. Endourol. 2008; 22: 1477-1481.
4. Freedland SJ, Terris MK, Csathy GS etal. Preoperative model for predicting prostate specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy using percent of biopsy tissue with cancer, biopsy Gleason grade and serum prostate specific antigen. J. Urol. 2004; 171: 2215-2220.
5. Coelho RF, Chauhan S, Orvieto MA etal. Predictive factors for positive surgical margins and their locations after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur. Urol. 2010; 57: 1022-1029.
6. Barocas DA, Salem S, Kordan Y etal. Robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: comparison of short-term biochemical recurrence-free survival. J. Urol. 2010; 183: 990-996.
7. Patel VR, Tully AS, Holmes R etal. Robotic radical prostatectomy in the community setting-the learning curve and beyond: initial 200 case. J. Urol. 2005; 174: 269-272.
8. Coughin G, Dangle PP, Palmer KJ etal. Athermal early retrograde release of the neurovascular bundle during nerve-spearing robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J. Robot Surg. 2009; 1: 13-17.
9. Gondo T, Yoshioka K, Hashimoto T etal. The powerful impact of double-layered posterior rhabdosphincter reconstruction on early recovery of urinary continence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. J. Endourol. 2012; 26: 1159-1164.
10. The Japanese Urological Association, The Japanese Society of Pathology, Japan Radiological Society. General Rule for Clinical and Pathological Studies on prostate cancer (4th edn). Desembre 2010 (in Japanese).
11. Atzpodien J, Royston P, Wandert T etal. Metastatic renal carcinoma comprehensive prognostic system. Br. J. Cancer 2003; 88: 348-353.
12. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 1982; 143: 29-36.
13. Horiguchi A, Nakashima J, Horiguchi Y etal. Prediction of extraprostatic cancer by prostate specific antigen density, endorectal MRI, and biopsy Gleason score in clinically localized prostate cancer. Prostate 2003; 15: 23-29.
14. Liss M, Osann K, Ornstein D. Positive surgical margins during robotic radical prostatectomy: a contemporary analysis of risk factors. BJU Int. 2008; 102: 603-608.
15. Ficarra V, Novara G, Secco S etal. Predictors of positive surgical margins after laparoscopic robot assisted radical prostatectomy. J. Urol. 2009; 182: 2682-2688.
16. Park JW, Won Lee H, Kim W etal. Comparative assessment of a single surgeon's series of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: conventional versus robot-assisted. J. Endourol. 2011; 25: 597-602.
17. Paul A, Ploussard G, Nicolaiew N etal. Oncologic outcome after extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: midterm follow-up of 1115 procedures. Eur. Urol. 2010; 57: 267-272.
18. Alkhateeb S, Alibhai S, Fleshner N etal. Impact of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy differs by disease risk group. J. Urol. 2010; 183: 145-150.
19. Williams SB, Chen MH, D'Amico AV etal. Radical retropubic prostatectomy and robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: likelihood of positive surgical margin(s). Urology 2010; 76: 1097-1101.
20. Coelho RF, Rocco B, Patel MB etal. Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatctomy: a critical review of outcomes reported by high-volume centers. J. Endourol. 2010; 24: 2003-2015.
21. Marchetti PE, Shikanov S, Razmaria AA etal. Impact of prostate weight on probability of positive surgical margins in patients with low-risk prostate cancer after robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Urology 2011; 77: 677-681.
22. Page JB, Davenport DL, Unnikrishnan R etal. Temporal relationship between positive margin rate after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and surgical training. Urology 2011; 77: 626-630.
23. White MA, De Haan AP, Stephens DD etal. Comparative analysis of surgical margins between radical retropubic prostatectomy and RALP: are patients sacrificed during initiation of robotics program? Urology 2009; 73: 567-571.
24. Castle EP, Atug F, Woods M etal. Impact of body mass index on outcomes after robot assisted radical prostatectomy. World J. Urol. 2008; 26: 91-95.
25. Zorn KC, Orvieto MA, Gong EM etal. Robotic radical prostatectomy learning curve of a fellowship-trained laparoscopic surgeon. J. Endourol. 2007; 21: 441-447.
26. Jaffe J, Castellucci S, Cathelineau X etal. Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: a single-institutions learning curve. Urology 2009; 73: 127-133.
27. Sooriakumaran P, John M, Wiklund P etal. Learning curve for robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: a multi-institutional study of 3794 patients. Minerva Urol. Nefrol. 2011; 63: 191-198.
28. Ahlering TE, Eichel L, Edwards RA etal. Robotic radical prostatectomy: a technique to reduce pT2 positive margins. Urology 2004; 64: 1224-1228.
29. Guru KA, Perlmutter AE, Sheldon MJ etal. Apical margins after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: does technique matter? J. Endourol. 2009; 23: 123-127.