Further evidence for the interaction of central and peripheral processes: The impact of double letters in writing English words

Frontiers in Psychology

Volumn 4, Issue OCT, 2013, Pages

  Kandel, Sonia ^a,b   Peereman, Ronald ^a   Ghimenton, Anna ^c  

^a UNIV GRENOBLE ALPES   (France)

^b INSTITUT UNIVERSITAIRE DE FRANCE   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ SORBONNE NOUVELLE PARIS 3   (France)

Author keywords

Cascaded processing; Central processing; Double letters; Handwriting; Peripheral processing; Spelling

Indexed keywords

EID: 84885391818     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16641078     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00729     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Afonso, O., and Álvarez, C. J. (2011). Phonological effects in handwriting production: Evidence from the implicit priming paradigm. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 37, 1474-1483. doi: 10.1037/a0024515
2. Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., and Gulikers, L. (1995). The CELEX lexical database [CD-ROM]. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.
3. Bonin, P., Peereman, R., and Fayol, M. (2001). Do phonological codes constrain the selection of orthographic codes in written picture naming. J. Mem. Lang. 45, 688-720. doi: 10.1006/jmla.2000.2786
4. Cassar, M., and Treiman, R. (1997). The beginnings of orthographic knowledge: Children's knowledge of double letters in words. J. Educ. Psychol. 89, 631-644. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.89.4.631
5. Delattre, M., Bonin, P., and Barry, C. (2006). Written spelling to dictation: Sound-to-spelling regularity affects both writing latencies and durations. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 32, 1330-1340. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.6.1330
6. Danjon, J., and Pacton, S. (2009). "Children's learning about properties of double letters: the case of French," in Presented at the 16th European Society for Cognitive Psychology Conference (ESCOP), (Kraków).
7. Fayol, M., Treiman, R., Lété, B., and Pacton, S. (2010). Learning to Spell from Reading: General Knowledge about Spelling Patterns can Distort Memory for Specific Words. St. Louis, MO: Psychonomic Society.
8. Glasspool, D. W., and Houghton, G. (2005). Serial order and consonant-vowel structure in a graphemic output buffer model. Brain Lang. 94, 304-330. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2005.01.006
9. Guinet, E., and Kandel, S. (2010). Ductus: A software package for the study of handwriting production. Behav. Res. Methods 42, 326-332. doi: 10.3758/BRM.42.1.326
10. Kandel, S., Peereman, R., Grosjacques, G., and Fayol, M. (2011). For a psycholinguistic model of handwriting production: Testing the syllable-bigram controversy. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 37, 1310-1322. doi: 10.1037/a0023094
11. Kandel, S., and Spinelli, E. (2010). Processing complex graphemes in handwriting production. Mem. Cogn. 38, 762-770. doi: 10.3758/MC.38.6.762
12. Kandel, S., Soler, O., Valdois, S., and Gros, C. (2006). Graphemes as motor units in the acquisition of writing skills. Read. Writ. 19, 313-337. doi: 10.1007/s11145-005-4321-5
13. Kawamoto, A. H., Kello, C. T., Jones, R., and Bame, K. (1998). Initial phoneme versus whole-word criterion to initiate pronunciation: Evidence based on response latency and initial phoneme duration. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 24, 862-885. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.24.4.862
14. McCloskey, M., Badecker, W., Goodman-Schulman, R. A., and Aliminosa, D. (1994). The structure of graphemic representations in spelling: Evidence from a case of acquired dysgraphia. Cogn. Neuropsychol. 11, 341-392. doi: 10.1080/02643299408251979
15. Miceli, G., Benvengnú, B., Capasso, R., and Caramazza, A. (1995). Selective deficit in processing double letters. Cortex 31, 161-171. doi: 10.1016/S0010-9452(13)80114-1
16. Pacton, S., Borchardt, G., Treiman, R., Lété, B., and Fayol, M. (in review). Learning to spell from reading: general knowledge about spelling patterns influences memory for specific words.
17. Pacton, S., Perruchet, P., Fayol, M., and Cleeremans, A. (2001). Implicit learning out of the lab: The case of orthographic regularities. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 130, 401-426. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.130.3.401
18. Rabiner, L. R., and Gold, B. (1975). Theory and application of digital signal processing. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
19. Rapp, B., Epstein, C., and Tainturier, M.-J. (2002). The integration of information across lexical and sublexical processes in spelling. Cogn. Neuropsychol. 19, 1-29. doi: 10.1080/0264329014300060
20. Rastle, K., Harrington, J., Palethorpe, S., and Coltheart, M. (2000). Reading aloud begins when the computation of phonology is complete. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 26, 1178-1191. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.26.3.1178
21. Roux, J.-S., McKeeff, T. J., Grosjacques, G., Afonso, O., and Kandel, S. (2013). The interaction between central and peripheral processes in handwriting production. Cognition 2, 235-241. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.12.009
22. Sternberg, S., Knoll, R. L., Monsell, S., and Wright, C. E. (1983). Control of Rapid Action Sequences in Speech and Typing. Murray Hill, NJ: ATandT Bell Laboratories.
23. Sternberg, S., Knoll, R. L., and Turock, D. L. (1990). "Hierarchical control in the execution of action sequences: Test of two invariance properties," in Attention and Performance XIII: Motor Representation and Control, ed M. Jeannerod (Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum), 3-55.
24. Teulings, H. L., Thomassen, A. J. W. M., and Van Galen, G. P. (1983). Preparation of partly precued handwriting movements: The size of movement units in handwriting. Acta Psychol. 54, 165-177. doi: 10.1016/0001-6918(83)90031-8
25. Qu, A., Damian, M. F., Zhang, Q., and Zhu, X. (2011). Phonology contributes to writing: Evidence from written word production in a nonalphabetic script. Psychol. Sci. 22, 1107-1112. doi: 10.1177/0956797611417001
26. Spinelli, E., Kandel, S., Guerassimovitch, H., and Ferrand, L. (2012). Graphemic cohesion effect in reading and writing complex graphemes. Lang. Cogn. Process. 27, 770-791. doi: 10.1080/01690965.2011.586534
27. Tainturier, M. J., and Caramazza, A. (1996). The status of double letters in graphemic representations. J. Mem. Lang. 36, 53-73. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1996.0003
28. Van Galen, G. P. (1991). Handwriting: Issues for a psychomotor theory. Hum. Mov. Sci. 10, 165-191. doi: 10.1016/0167-9457(91)90003-G
29. Van Galen, G. P., Smyth, M. M., Meulenbroek, R. G. J., and Hylkema, H. (1989). "The role of short-term memory and the motor buffer in handwriting under visual and non-visual guidance," in Computer Recognition and Human Production of Handwriting, eds R. Plamondon, C. Y. Suen and M. L. Simner, (Singapore: World Scientific), 253-271
30. Venneri, A., Cubelli, R., and Caffara, P. (1994). Perseverative dysgraphia: A selective disorder in writing double letters. Neuropsychologia 32, 923-931. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(94)90043-4
31. Weingarten, R. (2005). Subsyllabic units in written word production. Writ. Lang. Lit. 8, 43-61. doi: 10.1075/wll.8.1.03wei
32. Weingarten, R., Nottbusch, G., and Will, U. (2004). "Morphemes, syllables, and graphemes in written word production," in Multidisciplinary Approaches to Language Production, eds T. Pechmann and C. Habel (Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter), 529-572.
33. Wright, D. M., and Ehri, L. C. (2007). Beginners remember orthography when they learn to read words: The case of double letters. Appl. Psychol. 28, 115-133. doi: 10.1017/S0142716406070068
34. Yarkoni, T., Balota, D., and Yap, M. (2008). Moving beyond Coltheart's N: A new measure of orthographic similarity. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 15, 971-979. doi: 10.3758/PBR.15.5.971
35. Zhang, Q., and Damian, M. F. (2010). Impact of phonology on the generation of handwritten responses: Evdience from picture-word interference tasks. Mem. Cogn. 38, 519-528. doi: 10.3758/MC.38.4.519