Determination of the dynamics of healing at the tissue-implant interface by means of microcomputed tomography and functional apparent moduli

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 68-76

  Chang, Po Chun ^a,b,c   Seo, Yang Jo ^a,d   Goldstein, Steven A ^b,e   Giannobile, William V ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN SCHOOL OF DENTISTRY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^c NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

^d Seoul National University   (South Korea)

^e UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

Biomechanics; Dental implants; Finite element analysis; Microcomputed tomography

Indexed keywords

TITANIUM;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; BIOMECHANICS; BONE REGENERATION; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; MALE; MICRO-COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; OSTEOTOMY; PHYSIOLOGY; RAT; SPRAGUE DAWLEY RAT; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; WOUND HEALING;

ANIMALS; ARTIFACTS; BIOMECHANICAL PHENOMENA; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; MALE; OSSEOINTEGRATION; OSTEOTOMY; RATS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TITANIUM; WOUND HEALING; X-RAY MICROTOMOGRAPHY;

EID: 84885386778     PISSN: 08822786     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.11607/jomi.2614     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Franchi M, Fini M, Martini D, et al. Biological fixation of endosseous implants. Micron 2005; 36: 665-671.
2. Turkyilmaz I, Sennerby L, McGlumphy EA, Tozum TF. Biomechanical aspects of primary implant stability: A human cadaver study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2009 Jun; 11: 113-119.
3. Qian L, Todo M, Matsushita Y, Koyano K. Effects of implant diameter, insertion depth, and loading angle on stress/strain fields in implant/jawbone systems: Finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009; 24: 877-886.
4. Soballe K, Hansen ES, B-Rasmussen H, Jorgensen PH, Bunger C. Tissue ingrowth into titanium and hydroxyapatite-coated implants during stable and unstable mechanical conditions. J Orthop Res 1992; 10: 285-299.
5. Albrektsson T, Linder L. A method for short- and long-term in vivo study of the bone-implant interface. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1981; (159): 269-273.
6. Marco F, Milena F, Gianluca G, Vittoria O. Peri-implant osteogenesis in health and osteoporosis. Micron 2005; 36: 630-644.
7. Hedberg EL, Kroese-Deutman HC, Shih CK, et al. Methods: A comparative analysis of radiography, microcomputed tomography, and histology for bone tissue engineering. Tissue Eng 2005; 11: 1356-1367.
8. Sykaras N, Woody RD, Iacopino AM, Triplett RG, Nunn ME. Osseointegration of dental implants complexed with rhBMP-2: A comparative histomorphometric and radiographic evaluation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004; 19: 667-678.
9. Brownfield LA, Weltman RL. Ridge preservation with or without an osteoinductive allograft. A clinical, radiographic, Micro-CT, and histologic study evaluating dimensional changes and new bone formation of the alveolar ridge. J Periodontol 2012 May; 83: 581-589.
10. Park CH, Abramson ZR, Taba M Jr, et al. Three-dimensional microcomputed tomographic imaging of alveolar bone in experimental bone loss or repair. J Periodontol 2007; 78: 273-281.
11. Barrett JF, Keat N. Artifacts in CT: Recognition and avoidance. Radiographics 2004; 24: 1679-1691.
12. Brånemark R, Ohrnell LO, Skalak R, Carlsson L, Brånemark PI. Biomechanical characterization of osseointegration: An experimental in vivo investigation in the beagle dog. J Orthop Res 1998; 16: 61-69.
13. Atsumi M, Park SH, Wang HL. Methods used to assess implant stability:Current status. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007; 22: 743-754.
14. Johansson CB, Gretzer C, Jimbo R, Mattisson I, Ahlberg E. Enhanced implant integration with hierarchically structured implants: A pilot study in rabbits. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012 Aug; 23: 943-953.
15. Johansson CB, Han CH, Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T. A quantitative comparison of machined commercially pure titanium and titaniumaluminum- vanadium implants in rabbit bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998; 13: 315-321.
16. Tozum TF, Turkyilmaz I, McGlumphy EA. Relationship between dental implant stability determined by resonance frequency analysis measurements and peri-implant vertical defects: An in vitro study. J Oral Rehabil 2008; 35: 739-744.
17. Motoyoshi M, Yoshida T, Ono A, Shimizu N. Effect of cortical bone thickness and implant placement torque on stability of orthodontic mini-implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007; 22: 779-784.
18. Ramp LC, Jeffcoat RL. Dynamic behavior of implants as a measure of osseointegration. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001; 16: 637-645.
19. Berzins A, Shah B, Weinans H, Sumner DR. Nondestructive measurements of implant-bone interface shear modulus and effects of implant geometry in pull-out tests. J Biomed Mater Res 1997; 34: 337-340.
20. Chang PC, Seol YJ, Kikuchi N, Goldstein SA, Giannobile WV. Functional apparent moduli as predictors of oral implant osseointegration dynamics. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2010; 94: 118-126.
21. Risselada M, van Bree H, Kramer M, et al. Evaluation of nonunion fractures in dogs by use of B-mode ultrasonography, power Doppler ultrasonography, radiography, and histologic examination. Am J Vet Res 2006; 67: 1354-1361.
22. Chang PC, Seol YJ, Cirelli JA, et al. PDGF-B gene therapy accelerates bone engineering and oral implant osseointegration. Gene Ther 2010; 17: 95-104.
23. Keller TS. Predicting the compressive mechanical behavior of bone. J Biomech 1994; 27: 1159-1168.
24. Kelly DJ, Prendergast PJ. Prediction of the optimal mechanical properties for a scaffold used in osteochondral defect repair. Tissue Eng 2006; 12: 2509-2519.
25. Koca OL, Eskitascioglu G, Usumez A. Three-dimensional finiteelement analysis of functional stresses in different bone locations produced by implants placed in the maxillary posterior region of the sinus floor. J Prosthet Dent 2005; 93: 38-44.
26. Palmquist A, Emanuelsson L, Brånemark R, Thomsen P. Biomechanical, histological and ultrastructural analyses of laser micro- and nano-structured titanium implant after 6 months in rabbit. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2011; 97: 289-298.
27. Turkyilmaz I, McGlumphy EA. Is there a lower threshold value of bone density for early loading protocols of dental implants? J Oral Rehabil 2008; 35: 775-781.
28. Ersoy AE, Turkyilmaz I, Ozan O, McGlumphy EA. Reliability of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical guides generated from computed tomography: Clinical data from 94 implants. J Periodontol 2008; 79: 1339-1345.
29. Terzioglu H, Akkaya M, Ozan O. The use of a computerized tomography- based software program with a flapless surgical technique in implant dentistry: A case report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009; 24: 137-142.
30. Van Oossterwyck H, Duyck J, Vander Sloten J, et al. Use of microfocus computerized tomography as a new technique for characterizing bone tissue around oral implants. J Oral Implantol 2000; 26: 5-12.
31. Stoppie N, van der Waerden JP, Jansen JA, Duyck J, Wevers M, Naert IE. Validation of microfocus computed tomography in the evaluation of bone implant specimens. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2005; 7: 87-94.
32. Rebaudi A, Koller B, Laib A, Trisi P. Microcomputed tomographic analysis of the peri-implant bone. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2004; 24: 316-325.
33. Butz F, Ogawa T, Chang TL, Nishimura I. Three-dimensional boneimplant integration profiling using micro-computed tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006; 21: 687-695.
34. Jakel O, Reiss P. The influence of metal artefacts on the range of ion beams. Phys Med Biol 2007; 52: 635-644.
35. Hedia HS. Effect of coating thickness and its material on the stress distribution for dental implants. J Med Eng Technol 2007; 31: 280-287.