Optimal and cost-effective industrial biomethanation of tobacco

Renewable Energy

Volumn 63, Issue , 2014, Pages 280-285

  Gonzalez Gonzalez A ^a   Cuadros, F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EXTREMADURA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Biomethanation; Economic feasibility; Optimization; Tobacco

Indexed keywords

BIO-METHANATION; BIOLOGICAL PROCESS; ECONOMIC FEASIBILITIES; ECONOMIC VIABILITY; INVESTMENT RETURNS; MESOPHILIC ANAEROBIC DIGESTION; SEMI-CONTINUOUS MODE; SUBSTRATE COMPOSITION; METHANE PRODUCTION;

ANAEROBIC DIGESTION; CROPS; METHANE; OPTIMIZATION; SUBSTRATES; COST EFFECTIVENESS; INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS; INVESTMENTS; TOBACCO;

TOBACCO; ANAEROBIC DIGESTION;

ANOXIC CONDITIONS; BIOGAS; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ENERGY CROP; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; METHANE; OPTIMIZATION; TOBACCO; DECADAL VARIATION; FOSSIL FUEL; FUEL CONSUMPTION;

PORTUGAL; CACERES [EXTREMADURA]; EXTREMADURA; SPAIN;

CACERES; NICOTIANA OBTUSIFOLIA; NICOTIANA TABACUM; CERES;

EID: 84885356768     PISSN: 09601481     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2013.09.027     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Ministerio de Agricultura, Alimentación y Medio Ambiente, Avances de superficies y producciones de cultivos November 2012, [Updated 2013 June 23]. Available at:. http://www.magrama.gob.es/es/estadistica/temas/estadisticas-agrarias/agricultura/avances-superficies-producciones-agricolas/.
2. Fundación Formación y Empleo de Extremadura (Forem Extremadura) Estudio sobre el empleo e importancia social del cultivo de tabaco en Extremadura 2011, [Updated 2013 June 23]. Available at:. http://www.foremextremadura.com/userfiles/3946e52018433ebad128509dd4cba32d.pdf.
3. Instituto de Estadística de Extremadura 2013, [Updated 2013 June 23]. Available at:. http://estadistica.gobex.es/.
4. Instituto Nacional de Estadística 2013, [Updated 2013 June 23]. Available at:. http://www.ine.es.
5. Demirel B., Scherer P. Bio-methanization of energy crops through mono-digestion for continuous production of renewable biogas. Renew Energ 2009, 34(12):2940-2945.
6. Nielsen A.M., Feilberg A. Anaerobic digestion of energy crops in batch. Biosyst Eng 2012, 112(3):248-251.
7. Vervaeren H., Hostyn K., Ghekiere G., Willems B. Biological ensilage additives as pretreatment for maize to increase the biogas production. Renew Energ 2010, 35(9):2089-2093.
8. Nges I.A., Escobar F., Fu X., Björnsson L. Benefits of supplementing an industrial waste anaerobic digester with energy crops for increased biogas production. Waste Manag 2012, 32(1):53-59.
9. Proyecto probiogas [updated 2013 June 23]. Available from: http://www.probiogas.es.
10. Izumi K., Okishio Y., Nagao N., Niwa C., Yamamato S., Toda T. Effects of particlesize on anaerobic digestion of food waste. Int Biodeter Biodegr 2010, 64:601-608.
11. González-González A., Cuadros F., Ruiz-Celma A., López-Rodríguez F. Energy-Environmental benefits and economic feasibility of anaerobic codigestion of Iberian pig slaughterhouse and tomato industry wastes in Extremadura (Spain). Bioresour Technol 2013, 136:109-116.
12. APHA, AWWA, WPCF, Métodos Normalizados para el Análisis de Aguas Potables y Residuales, seventheenth ed., Díaz de Santos S.A 1992, Madrid.
13. Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development of Alberta Economic feasibility of anaerobic digesters, Agri-facts 2008, [updated 2013 June 23] Available at:. http://www1.agric.gov.ab.ca/$department/deptdocs.nsf/all/agdex12280/$file/768-6.pdf?OpenElement.
14. Agencia Andaluza de la Energía Estudio básico del biogás 2011, [updated 2013 June 23] Available at:. http://www.agenciaandaluzadelaenergia.es/sites/default/files/estudio_basico_del_biogas_0.pdf.
15. Gebrezgabher S.A., Meuwissen M.P.M., Prins B.A.M., Oude Lansink A.G.J.M. Economic analysis of anaerobic digestion. A case of green power biogas plant in The Netherlands. NJAS Wageningen J Life Sci 2010, 57:109-115.
16. United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) An analysis of energy production costs from anaerobic digestion systems on U.S. livestock production facilities 2007, [updated 2013 June 23] Available at:. http://www.agmrc.org/media/cms/manuredigesters_FC5C31F0F7B78.pdf.
17. Naskeo Environment, Economy of biogas installations, [updated 2013 June 23]. Available at:. http://www.biogas-renewable-energy.info/biogas_installations_investments.html.
18. Martin J.H. Aprotocol for quantifying and reporting the performance of anaerobic digestion systems for livestock manures 2007, International symposium on air quality and waste management for agriculture; Broomfield, Colorado.
19. Ministerio de Industria, Energía y Turismo (MINETUR), Precio de carburantes 2013, [updated 2013 June 23]. Available at:. http://m.minetur.gob.es/Carburantes.
20. Cuadros F., López-Rodríguez F., Ruiz-Celma A., Rubiales F., González-González A. Recycling, reuse and energetic valuation of meat industry wastes in Extremadura (Spain). Resour Conservat Recycl 2011, 55(4):393-399.
21. Cuadros F., González-González A., Ruiz-Celma A., López-Rodríguez F. Recovery of energy and water through an eco-efficient treatment of olive mill wastewates 2012, International Congress on Water, Waste and Energy Management, Mayo, Salamanca.
22. Roth G.W. Corn silage production and management. Information and communication technologies in the college of agricultural sciences 2001, The Pennsylvania State University.