Your ideas about participation and environment: A new self-report instrument

Disability and Rehabilitation

Volumn 35, Issue 22, 2013, Pages 1903-1908

  Cheeseman, Danielle ^a   Madden, Ros ^a   Bundy, Anita ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

ICF; Patient perspective; Person centred care

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; DISABLED PERSON; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE FACILITY; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; QUESTIONNAIRE; SELF REPORT;

ADULT; DISABLED PERSONS; FEMALE; HEALTH FACILITY ENVIRONMENT; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT-CENTERED CARE; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; QUESTIONNAIRES; SELF REPORT;

EID: 84885337845     PISSN: 09638288     EISSN: 14645165     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/09638288.2013.767385     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. MacDonald C. Self-assessment models, practice and tools within disability support services. New Zealand: Ministry of Health; 2010.
2. Griffiths P, Harris R, Ullman R. Self assessment of health and social care needs by older people: a multi-method systematic review of practices, accuracy, effectiveness and experience. London: National Co-ordinating Centre for NHS Service Delivery and Organisation R&D (NCCSDO); 2005.
3. Frost M, Reeve B, Liepa A, et al. What is sufficient evidence for the reliability and validity of patient reported outcome measures? Value Health 2007;10:S94-105.
4. Hahn EA, Cella D, Chassany O, et al. Clinical Significance Consensus Meeting Group. Precision of health-related quality-of-life data compared with other clinical measures. Mayo Clin Proc 2007;82:1244-54.
5. Jylha M. What is self-rated health and why does it predict mortality? Towards a unified conceptual model. Soc Sci Med 2009;69:307-16.
6. Magasi S, Post M. A comparative review of contemporary participation measures' psychometric properties and content coverage. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2010;91:S17-28.
7. World Health Organization. ICF: International classification of functioning, disability, and health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.
8. Wade D, Halligan P. New wine in old bottles: the WHO ICF as an explanatory model of human behaviour. Clin Rehabil 2003; 17:349-54.
9. Resnik L, Plow M. Measuring participation as defined by the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: an evaluation of existing measures. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2009;90:856-66.
10. Post M. Measuring the subjective appraisal of participation with life satisfaction measures: bridging the gap between participation and quality of life measurement. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil 2010;15:1-15.
11. Heinemann A. Measurement of participation in rehabilitation research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2010;91:S1-4.
12. Whiteneck G, Dijkers M. Difficult to measure constructs: conceptual and methodological issues concerning participation and environmental factors. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2009;90:S22-35.
13. Brown M, Dijkers M, Gordon W, et al. Participation objective, participation subjective: a measure of participation combining outsider and insider perspectives. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2004; 19:459-81.
14. Noonan V, Kopec J, Noreau L, et al. Comparing the content of participation instruments using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2009;7:93. doi:10.1186/1477-7525-7-93.
15. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. A functioning and related health outcomes module: the development of a data capture tool for health and community services information systems. AIHW cat. no. WP53. Canberra: AIHW; 2005.
16. Gray D, Hollingsworth H, Stark S, Morgan K. Participation survey/mobility: psychometric properties of a measure of participation for people with mobility impairments and limitations. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2006;87:189-97.
17. Noreau L, Boschen K. Intersection of participation and environmental factors: a complex interactive process. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2010;91:S44-53.
18. National Community Services Data Committee. National community services data dictionary: version five. Canberra, Australia: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare; 2008.
19. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW). ICF Australian user guide. Version 1.0. Disability series. AIHW Cat. No. DIS 33. Canberra: AIHW; 2003.
20. Brod M, Tesler L, Christensen T. Qualitative research and content validity: developing best practices based on science and experience. Qual Life Res 2009;18:1263-78.
21. Green J, Thorogood N. Qualitative methods for health research. London: SAGE; 2009.
22. Hammel J, Magasi S, Heinemann A, et al. What does participation mean? An insider perspective from people with disabilities. Disabil Rehabil 2008;30:1445-60.
23. Black N, Jenkinson C. Measuring patients' experiences and outcomes. Br Med J 2009;339:202-5.
24. Epstein R, Fiscella K, Lesser C, Stange K. Why the nation needs a policy push on patient-centered health care. Health Aff (Millwood) 2010;29:1489-95.
25. Little P, Everitt H, Williamson I, et al. Observational study of effect of patient centredness and positive approach on outcomes of general practice consultations. BMJ 2001;323:908-11.
26. Rao J, Anderson L, Inui T, Frankel R. Communication interventions make a difference in conversations between physicians and patients: a systematic review of the evidence. Med Care 2007;45:340-9.
27. Stewart M, Brown J, Donner A, et al. The impact of patient-centered care on outcomes. J Fam Pract 2000;49:796-804.
28. Leach E, Cornwell P, Fleming J, Haines T. Patient centered goal-setting in a subacute rehabilitation setting. Disabil Rehabil 2010;32:159-72.
29. Challis D, Clarkson P, Hughes J, et al. Enhancing the efficiency of effectiveness of assessment in community care. Vol. IV. Self assessment pilot projects: concluding observations. Manchester, UK: Personal Social Services Research Unit, PSSRU, University of Manchester; 2008.
30. Glendinning C, Challis D, Fernández JL, et al. Evaluation of the individual budgets pilot programme final report. York: Social Policy Research Unit, University of York; 2008.
31. World Health Organization. Towards a common language for functioning, disability and health. Geneva: ICF; 2002.
32. Ritchie J, Lewis J, eds. Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers. London: Sage Publications Ltd; 2003.
33. World Health Organization, The World Bank. World report on disability. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2011.